Show simple item record

Certification, Forest Conservation, and Cattle: Theories and Evidence of Change in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorNewton, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorAlves‐pinto, Helena Neryen_US
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Luís Fernando Guedesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-01T20:56:17Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T17:27:58Zen
dc.date.issued2015-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationNewton, Peter; Alves‐pinto, Helena Nery ; Pinto, Luís Fernando Guedes (2015). "Certification, Forest Conservation, and Cattle: Theories and Evidence of Change in Brazil." Conservation Letters 8(3): 206-213.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-263Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-263Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111945
dc.description.abstractVoluntary certification programs for agricultural and forest products have been developed to improve the environmental and social sustainability of production processes. The new Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN) cattle certification program aims to reduce deforestation in the cattle supply chain, with a focus on Brazil. Drawing on information from interviews with key actors in Brazil, this article discusses the mechanisms that may enable the SAN cattle program to achieve these goals and to avoid critiques that have been leveled at other commodity certification programs. The program sets higher standards for sustainability than any existing policy or incentive mechanism. Participation in the program may generate significant indirect financial and non‐financial benefits. The program may also influence the supply chain more widely: by demonstrating that certifiable, traceable, sustainable cattle production is viable; by “raising the bar” of sustainability standards through rigorous criteria; and by creating new markets and incentives. While the scaling up and impact of the SAN cattle program will depend in part on how it is supported or constrained by other interventions in the same sector, the program appears to be characterized by a rigorous program design that is necessary, if not sufficient, to catalyze reduced rates of forest loss.en_US
dc.publisherYale University Faculty of Environmental Studies Publication Seriesen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherincentivesen_US
dc.subject.otherinstitutionsen_US
dc.subject.otherinterventionsen_US
dc.subject.othersupply chainen_US
dc.subject.othergreenhouse gas emissionsen_US
dc.subject.otherAmazoniaen_US
dc.subject.otherAgricultureen_US
dc.titleCertification, Forest Conservation, and Cattle: Theories and Evidence of Change in Brazilen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111945/1/conl12116.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/conl.12116en_US
dc.identifier.sourceConservation Lettersen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinto, L.F.G. & McDermott, C. ( 2013 ). Equity and forest certification—a case study in Brazil. Forest Policy Econ., 30, 23 ‐ 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohn, A.S. & O'Rourke, D. ( 2011 ). Agricultural certification as a conservation tool in Latin America. J. Sustain. Forest., 30, 158 ‐ 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrigo, I.G. ( 2013 ). Rumo à carne sustentável certificada? As razões e os mecanismos pelos quais os produtores de carne bovina na Amazônia Legal estão iniciando mudanças em suas práticas. Projeto de Pós Doutorado: Padrões privados de sustentabilidade na cadeia produtiva da carne bovina na Amazônia Brasileira e cerrado. Núcleo de Economia Socioambiental. Faculdade de Economia e Administração—Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurst, P., McKenzie, P., Brown, C. & Appanah, S. ( 2006 ). Challenges facing certification and eco‐labelling of forest products in developing countries. Int. Forest. Rev., 8, 193 ‐ 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForest Code. ( 2012 ). Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011‐2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm. Accessed June 3, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFSC ( 2004 ). Looking to the future. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenpeace. ( 2013 ). Certifying destruction: why consumer companies need to go beyond the RSPO to stop forest destruction. Greenpeace, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGTPS ( 2013 ). Grupo de Trabalho da Pecuária Sustentável. Mechanisms for control and mitigation of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. White Paper. http://www.pecuariasustentavel.org.br/gtps/GTPS_White_Paper_on_mechanisms_for_control_and_mitigation_of_deforestation_in_the_Brazilian_Amazon_Biome_(Livestock_Cattle).pdf. Accessed June 3, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartsfield, A. & Ostermeier, D. ( 2003 ) Certification: the view from FSC‐certified land managers. J. Forest., 101, 32 ‐ 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaurance, W.F., Koh, L.P., Butler, R., et al. ( 2010 ). Improving the performance of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol., 24, 377 ‐ 381.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarfrig ( 2012 ). Annual Report 2012. http://www.riccari.com.br/clientes/marfrig/rso2012/Arquivos/Pdf/18_Gestao_Qualidade_Seguranca_Ativos_Intangiveis.pdf. Accessed June 3, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDermott, C.L. ( 2013 ). Certification and equity: applying an “equity framework” to compare certification schemes across product sectors and scales. Environ. Sci. Policy, 33, 428 ‐ 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDermott, C.L., Cashore, B. & Kanowski, P. ( 2009 ). Setting the bar: an international comparison of public and private forest policy specifications and implications for explaining policy trends. Environ. Sci., 6, 217 ‐ 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMCTI ( 2013 ). Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, Brasilia, Brazil.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNepstad, D.C., Stickler, C.M. & Almeida, O.T. ( 2006 ). Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol., 20, 1595 ‐ 1603.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewton, P., Agrawal, A. & Wollenberg, L. ( 2013 ). Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes. Global Environ. Chang., 23, 1761 ‐ 1772.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerera, P. & Vlosky, R.P. ( 2006 ). A history of forest certification. Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, LSU AgCenter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoisot, A.N., Speedy, A. & Kueneman, E. ( 2004 ). Good agricultural practices—a working concept. Background paper for the FAO internal workshop on good agricultural practices. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), Rome, Italy.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRainforest Alliance ( 2013 ). Investing in sustainability: the costs and benefits of certification. Rainforest Alliance, New York. Available from: http://www.rainforest‐alliance.org/publications/costs‐benefits‐certification. Accessed June 3, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRipple, W.J., Smith, P., Haberl, H., Montzka, S.A., McAlpine, C. & Boucher, D.H. ( 2014 ). Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 2 ‐ 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSAN ( 2010 ). Standard for sustainable cattle production systems. Sustainable Agriculture Network, San José, Costa Rica.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSAN ( 2014 ). List of certified farms and operations. Sustainable Agriculture Network, http://sanstandards.org/sitio/subsections/display/16. Accessed June 3, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarlat, N. & Dallemand, J.‐F. ( 2011 ). Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy, 39, 1630 ‐ 1646.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteering Committee of the State‐of‐Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification ( 2012 ). Toward sustainability: the roles and limitations of certification. RESOLVE, Inc., Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Werf, G.R., Morton, D.C., DeFries, R.S., et al. ( 2009 ). CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nat. Geosci., 2, 737 ‐ 738.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, N.F., Patel, S.A. & Kalif, K.A.B. ( 2013 ). From Amazon pasture to the high street: deforestation and the Brazilian cattle product supply chain. Trop. Conserv. Sci., 6, 446 ‐ 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlves‐Pinto, H.N., Newton, P. & Pinto, L.F.G. ( 2013 ). Certifying sustainability: opportunities and challenges for the cattle supply chain in Brazil. CCAFS Working Paper No 57. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarona, E., Ramankutty, N., Hyman, G. & Coomes, O.T. ( 2010 ). The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 024002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernstein, S. & Cashore, B. ( 2007 ). Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regul. Gov., 1, 347 ‐ 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBush, S., Belton, B., Hall, D., et al. ( 2013 ). Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science, 341, 1067 ‐ 1068.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCashore, B., Auld, G., Bernstein, S. & McDermott, C. ( 2007 ). Can non‐state governance ‘ratchet up'global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Rev. Eur. Comm. Int. Environ. Law, 16, 158 ‐ 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCashore, B., Gale, F., Meidinger, E. & Newsom, D. ( 2006 ). Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Yale University Faculty of Environmental Studies Publication Series, Newhaven, CT.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.