Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Angle for Predicting the Outcome of Horizontal Bone Augmentation
dc.contributor.author | Garaicoa, Carlos | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Suarez, Fernando | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Jia‐hui | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Hsun‐liang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Monje, Alberto | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Galindo‐moreno, Pablo | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hom‐lay | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-05T16:46:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-06T15:43:59Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Garaicoa, Carlos; Suarez, Fernando; Fu, Jia‐hui ; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Monje, Alberto; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2015). "Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Angle for Predicting the Outcome of Horizontal Bone Augmentation." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (4): 717-723. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1523-0899 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-8208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112208 | |
dc.description.abstract | BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the influence of ridge morphology on the amount of horizontal bone augmentation achieved with the sandwich bone augmentation (SBA) technique in the reconstruction of buccal dehiscence defects on dental implants.MethodsCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess bone width changes in 26 patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted in 2008 to 2011. The amount of horizontal bone gain was evaluated at four different levels (3, 6, 9, and 12 mm apical to the alveolar crest) and three different time points (T1: baseline, T2: at time of graft placement, and T3: 6 months later). Different morphological characteristics of the alveolar ridge were also evaluated to determine their influence on horizontal bone augmentation. A total of 78 CBCT scans were assessed.ResultsComparison of the changes in ridge morphology at all measurement locations showed an overall ridge width gain of 2.30 ± 2.20 mm after 6 months. The use of membranes and the angulation of the concavity played a role in influencing the outcomes of the SBA technique. Critical crest angulation (CA) is 150° for bone gain at 9 mm apical to the crest. When CA is smaller than 150°, the horizontal bone gain was 4.3 ± 2.2 mm; if CA is greater than 150°, the gain was significantly lower at 1.3 ± 1.7 mm (p = .001).ConclusionsSBA is a reliable and predictable technique to gain horizontal ridge width with simultaneous implant placement. Crest ridge angulation can be used as a tool to predict bone gain at 9 mm apical to the bone crest. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | alveolar ridge reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject.other | implant | en_US |
dc.subject.other | guided bone regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | cone beam CT | en_US |
dc.subject.other | bone augmentation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | bone allograft | en_US |
dc.title | Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Angle for Predicting the Outcome of Horizontal Bone Augmentation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112208/1/cid12174.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/cid.12174 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993; 13: 29 – 45. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single‐tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12‐month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 – 323. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Becker W, Becker BE, Berg L, Samsam C. Clinical and volumetric analysis of three‐wall intrabony defects following open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1986; 57: 277 – 285. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tonetti MS, Pini‐Prato G, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects. IV. Determinants of healing response. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 934 – 940. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fu JH, Wang HL. Horizontal bone augmentation: the decision tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 429 – 436. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Park SH, Brooks SL, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Effect of ridge morphology on guided bone regeneration outcome: conventional tomographic study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1231 – 1236. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang HL, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 8 – 17. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976; 47: 256 – 260. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 10 – 29. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212 – 218. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Park SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, et al. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 32 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fu JH, Oh TJ, Benavides E, Rudek I, Wang HL. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 [Epub ahead of print]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 80 – 90. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee A, Brown D, Wang HL. Sandwich bone augmentation for predictable horizontal bone augmentation. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 282 – 290. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang HL, Misch C, Neiva RF. “Sandwich” bone augmentation technique: rationale and report of pilot cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 232 – 245. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Amorfini L, Migliorati M, Signori A, Silvestrini‐Biavati A, Benedicenti S. Block allograft technique versus standard guided bone regeneration: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013 [Epub ahead of print]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML. Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 321 – 327. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 672 – 676. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.