View Item 

Show simple item record

Navigating venous access: A guide for hospitalists

dc.contributor.authorSimonov, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorPittiruti, Mauroen_US
dc.contributor.authorRickard, Claire M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Vineeten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-05T16:47:03Z
dc.date.available2016-08-08T16:18:38Zen
dc.date.issued2015-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationSimonov, Michael; Pittiruti, Mauro; Rickard, Claire M.; Chopra, Vineet (2015). "Navigating venous access: A guide for hospitalists." Journal of Hospital Medicine 10(7): 471-478.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-5592en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-5606en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112219
dc.publisherInfusion Nurses Societyen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleNavigating venous access: A guide for hospitalistsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112219/1/jhm2335.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jhm.2335en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Hospital Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl Ters M, Schears GJ, Taler SJ, et al. Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case‐control study in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60 ( 4 ): 601 – 608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter‐related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39 ( 4 suppl 1 ): S1 – S34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, O'Horo JC, Rogers MA, Maki DG, Safdar N. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34 ( 9 ): 908 – 918.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSociety for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Hospital Association, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, The Joint Commission. Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare‐Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Updates. Available at: http://www.shea‐online.org. Accessed August 1, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoggard J, Saad T, Schon D, Vesely TM, Royer T. Guidelines for venous access in patients with chronic kidney disease. A Position Statement from the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology, Clinical Practice Committee and the Association for Vascular Access. Semin Dial. 2008; 21 ( 2 ): 186 – 191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInfusion Nurses Society. Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice. Norwood, MA; Infusion Nurses Society; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams AW, Dwyer AC, Eddy AA, et al. Critical and honest conversations: the evidence behind the “Choosing Wisely” campaign recommendations by the American Society of Nephrology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7 ( 10 ): 1664 – 1672.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Govindan S, Sweis R, et al. Do physicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters? A multi‐center observational study. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161 ( 8 ): 562 – 567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZingg W, Sandoz L, Inan C, et al. Hospital‐wide survey of the use of central venous catheters. J Hosp Infect. 2011; 77 ( 4 ): 304 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Ratz D, Kuhn L, Lopus T, Lee A, Krein S. Peripherally inserted central catheter‐related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12 ( 6 ): 847 – 854.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLatham HE, Dwyer TT, Gregg BL, Simpson SQ. An in vitro study comparing a peripherally inserted central catheter to a conventional central venous catheter: no difference in static and dynamic pressure transmission. BMC Anesthesiol. 2010; 10: 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePittiruti M, Brutti A, Celentano D, et al. Clinical experience with power‐injectable PICCs in intensive care patients. Crit Care. 2012; 16 ( 1 ): R21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexandrou E, Murgo M, Calabria E, et al. Nurse‐led central venous catheter insertion‐procedural characteristics and outcomes of three intensive care based catheter placement services. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49 ( 2 ): 162 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl Raiy B, Fakih MG, Bryan‐Nomides N, et al. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: a safe alternative to high‐risk short‐term central venous catheters. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38 ( 2 ): 149 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalinoski D, Ewing T, Bhakta A, et al. Which central venous catheters have the highest rate of catheter‐associated deep venous thrombosis: a prospective analysis of 2,128 catheter days in the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74 ( 2 ): 454 – 460; discussion 461–452.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382 ( 9889 ): 311 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1: CD011447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSasadeusz KJ, Trerotola SO, Shah H, et al. Tunneled jugular small‐bore central catheters as an alternative to peripherally inserted central catheters for intermediate‐term venous access in patients with hemodialysis and chronic renal insufficiency. Radiology. 1999; 213 ( 1 ): 303 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGirgenti C, Moureau N. The need for comparative data in vascular access: the rationale and design of the PICC registry. J Vasc Access. 2013; 18 ( 4 ): 219 – 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Kuhn L, Coffey CE Jr, et al. Hospitalist experiences, practice, opinions, and knowledge regarding peripherally inserted central catheters: a Michigan survey. J Hosp Med. 2013; 8 ( 6 ): 309 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically‐indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 4: CD007798.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Webster J, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014; 12 ( 1 ): 51 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012; 380 ( 9847 ): 1066 – 1074.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, et al. epic3: national evidence‐based guidelines for preventing healthcare‐associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 86 ( suppl 1 ): S1 – S70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadaway L. Short peripheral intravenous catheters and infections. J Infus Nurs. 2012; 35 ( 4 ): 230 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCicolini G, Manzoli L, Simonetti V, et al. Phlebitis risk varies by peripheral venous catheter site and increases after 96 hours: a large multi‐centre prospective study. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 70 ( 11 ): 2539 – 2549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKagel EM, Rayan GM. Intravenous catheter complications in the hand and forearm. J Trauma. 2004; 56 ( 1 ): 123 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSauerland C, Engelking C, Wickham R, Corbi D. Vesicant extravasation part I: Mechanisms, pathogenesis, and nursing care to reduce risk. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006; 33 ( 6 ): 1134 – 1141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung. 2005; 34 ( 5 ): 345 – 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu YT, Alsaawi A, Bjornsson HM. Ultrasound‐guided peripheral venous access: a systematic review of randomized‐controlled trials. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014; 21 ( 1 ): 18 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer P, Cronier P, Rousseau H, et al. Difficult peripheral venous access: clinical evaluation of a catheter inserted with the Seldinger method under ultrasound guidance. J Crit Care. 2014; 29 ( 5 ): 823 – 827.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook LS. Choosing the right intravenous catheter. Home Healthc Nurse. 2007; 25 ( 8 ): 523 – 531; quiz 532–523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdverse reactions associated with midline catheters—United States, 1992–1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996; 45 ( 5 ): 101 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMermel LA, Parenteau S, Tow SM. The risk of midline catheterization in hospitalized patients. A prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123 ( 11 ): 841 – 844.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffiths V. Midline catheters: indications, complications and maintenance. Nurs Stand. 2007; 22 ( 11 ): 48 – 57; quiz 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaparas JV, Hu JP. Safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Access. 2014; 15 ( 4 ): 251 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson NR. Midline catheters: the middle ground of intravenous therapy administration. J Infus Nurs. 2004; 27 ( 5 ): 313 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnson JA. Vascular access in resuscitation: is there a role for the intraosseous route? Anesthesiology. 2014; 120 ( 4 ): 1015 – 1031.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacnab A, Christenson J, Findlay J, et al. A new system for sternal intraosseous infusion in adults. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000; 4 ( 2 ): 173 – 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Bogner V, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: a prospective, randomized study. Resuscitation. 2010; 81 ( 8 ): 994 – 999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrlowski JP, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM, Lockrem JD, VanLente F. Comparison study of intraosseous, central intravenous, and peripheral intravenous infusions of emergency drugs. Am J Dis Child. 1990; 144 ( 1 ): 112 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrlowski JP, Julius CJ, Petras RE, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM. The safety of intraosseous infusions: risks of fat and bone marrow emboli to the lungs. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18 ( 10 ): 1062 – 1067.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePittiruti M, Hamilton H, Biffi R, MacFie J, Pertkiewicz M. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications). Clin Nutr. 2009; 28 ( 4 ): 365 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkers A, Chelluri L. Peripherally inserted central catheter use in the hospitalized patient: is there a role for the hospitalist? J Hosp Med. 2009; 4 ( 6 ): E1 – E4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVital signs: central line‐associated blood stream infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60 ( 8 ): 243 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarricone R, Torbica A, Franzetti F, Rosenthal VD. Hospital costs of central line‐associated bloodstream infections and cost‐effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010; 8: 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81 ( 9 ): 1159 – 1171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Joint Commission. Preventing Central Line‐Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Global Challenge, a Global Perspective. Oak Brook, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2012.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jhm2335.pdf
Size:
327.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.