Show simple item record

Spatial Dynamics Of Vertical And Horizontal Intergovernmental Collaboration

dc.contributor.authorGerber, Elisabeth R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLoh, Carolyn G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-05T16:47:21Z
dc.date.available2016-09-06T15:43:59Zen
dc.date.issued2015-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationGerber, Elisabeth R. ; Loh, Carolyn G. (2015). "Spatial Dynamics Of Vertical And Horizontal Intergovernmental Collaboration." Journal of Urban Affairs 37(3): 270-288.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0735-2166en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9906en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112248
dc.description.abstractAlthough researchers have made progress in understanding motivations behind local government collaboration, there is little research that explores the spatial dynamics of such interactions. Does the idea of collaboration travel horizontally, passed from neighbor to neighbor, or is vertical leadership from state, county, or regional actors more important in influencing local governments’ decisions to share resources and functions? What factors influence local governments’ choices to collaborate with their neighbors versus a regional entity, county, or state government? In this article, we investigate the importance of vertical and horizontal influences when local governments decide to collaborate around land use planning. Using data from a survey of Michigan local government officials, we take a spatial statistical approach to answering this question. We find widespread evidence of collaboration at multiple scales, and observe patterns of both horizontal and vertical influence. We also find that contextual factors help to explain these patterns of collaboration.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nebraska Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleSpatial Dynamics Of Vertical And Horizontal Intergovernmental Collaborationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planningen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112248/1/juaf12139.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/juaf.12139en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Urban Affairsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell, J. A. ( 2000 ). Addressing regional dilemmas for minority communities. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 218 – 246 ). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohamed, R. ( 2008 ). Who would pay for rural open space preservation and inner‐city redevelopment? Identifying support for policies that can contribute to regional land use governance. Urban Studies, 45, 2783 – 2803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorris, D. F. ( 2001 ). Whither metropolitan governance ? Urban Affairs Review, 36, 532 – 550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlberding, J. C. ( 2002 ). Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review, 62, 480 – 491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePost, S. S. ( 2002 ). Local government cooperation: The relationships between metropolitan area government geography and service provision. Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA. Retrieved May 31, 2012, from http://localgov.fsu.edu/papers/archive/PostStephanie.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePost, S. S. ( 2004 ). Metropolitan area governance and institutional collective action. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and collaboration (pp. 67 – 92 ). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz, B. ( 2000 ). Editor's overview. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 1 – 8 ). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRusk, D. ( 2000 ). Growth management: The core regional issue. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 78 – 106 ). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. ( 2000 ). Introduction: Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review, 32, 158 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider, K. ( 2003 ). Michigan apartheid: Reforming land use policy can help most segregated state. Retrieved May 21, 2013, from http://www.mlui.org/mlui/news‐views/articles‐from‐1995‐to‐2012.html?archive_id = 204‐.UZ0Gj‐shMrgen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder, R. ( 2011 ). A special message from Governor Rick Snyder: Community development and local government reforms. Retrieved from www.michigan.goven_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThurmaier, K. ( 2006 ). High‐intensity interlocal collaboration in three Iowa cities. Public Administration Review, 66, 144 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisser, J. A. ( 2002 ). Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions: Toward a cultural model of interlocal Relations. American Review of Public Administration, 32 ( 1 ), 40 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisser, J. A. ( 2004 ). Voluntary regional councils and the new regionalism: Effective governance in the smaller metropolis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 51 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, S. M. ( 2002 ). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 267 – 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, O. P. ( 1967 ). Life style values and political decentralization in metropolitan areas. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48 ( 3 ), 299 – 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeemering, E. S. ( 2009 ). California county administrators as sellers and brokers of interlocal cooperation. State and Local Government Review, 41 ( 3 ), 166 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin, L. ( 1995 ). Local indicators of spatial autocorrelation—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 ( 2 ), 93 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasolo, V. ( 2003 ). US regionalism and rationality. Urban Studies, 40, 447 – 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyle, R., & Mohamed, R. ( 2007 ). State growth management, smart growth and urban containment: A review of the US and a study of the heartland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 677 – 697.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowne, W. P. & VerBurg, K. ( 1995 ). Michigan politics and government: Facing change in a complex state. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurby, R. J., & May. P. J. ( 1997 ). Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnley, I. H., & Murphy, P. A. ( 1995 ). Exurban development in Australia and the United States: Through a glass darkly. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 245 – 254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. ( 2001 ). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarr, J. B., Gerber, E. R., & Lupher, E. ( 2009 ). Explaining horizontal and vertical cooperation on public services in Michigan: The role of local fiscal capacity. In G. Sands & R. Jelier (Eds.), Metropolitan affairs in Michigan: Case studies and best practices (pp. 207 – 236 ). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCitizens Research Council. ( 1994 ). Michigan Constitutional Issues. Report No. 313 – 09. Retrieved June 1, 2013, from www.crcmich.org.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavid, N. P. ( 2008 ). Why cooperate? An evaluation of the formation and persistence of voluntary regional land use cooperative arrangements in Michigan (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Retrieved March 9, 2011, from lib.umich.eduen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutzik, T. & Imus, B. ( 2002 ). Coordinated planning in Michigan: Three case studies. Ann Arbor, MI: PIRGIM Education Fund.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceESRI Developer Network. ( 2011 ). Hot spot analysis (Getis‐Ord Gi*) (Spatial statistics). Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://edndoc.esri.com/arcobjects/9.2/net/shared/geoprocessing/spatial_statistics_tools/hot_spot_analysis_getis_ord_gi_star_spatial_statistics_.htmen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, R. C. ( 2007 ). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 47 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, R. C. ( 2008 ). Institutional collective action and local government collaboration. In L. B. Bingham & R. O'Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 195 – 210 ). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrederickson, H. G. ( 1999 ). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32, 701 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedman, J. ( 2008 ). Antisemitism without Jews: Left behind in the heartland. In P. Lassner & L. Trubowitz (Eds.), Antisemitism and philosemitism in the twentieth and twenty‐first centuries (pp. 154 – 174 ). Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press es.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGainsborough, J. ( 2002 ). Slow growth and urban sprawl: Support for a new regional agenda. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 728 – 744.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, E. R. ( 2005 ). Regional governance in Michigan. CLOSUP/Ann Arbor Area Chamber of Commerce Policy Report. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at http://www.umich.edu/CLOSUPen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, E.R., & C.G. Loh. ( 2011 ). Prospects for expanding regional planning efforts in Michigan. Urban Studies, 48, 2303 – 2319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGetis, A., and Ord, J. K. ( 1992 ). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowell‐Moroney, M. ( 2008 ). The Tiebout hypothesis 50 years later: Lessons and lingering challenges for metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Public Administration Review, 68, 97 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs, A. J. ( 2003 ). Embedded autonomy and uneven metropolitan development: A comparison of the Detroit and Nagoya auto regions, 1969–2000. Urban Studies, 40, 335 – 360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs, J. ( 1961 ). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKern, K., & Alber, G. ( 2009, October). Governing climate change in cities: Modes of urban climate governance in multi‐level systems. Paper presented at the International Conference on Competitive Cities and Climate Change, Milan, Italy.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeroux, K., & Carr, J. B. ( 2007 ). Explaining local government cooperation on public works. Public Works Management and Policy, 12, 344 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMay, P. J. ( 1995 ). Can cooperation be mandated? Implementing intergovernmental environmental management in New South Wales and New Zealand. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25 ( 1 ), 89 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGee, M. P., & Trebilcock, C. M. ( 2007 ). Intergovernmental cooperation in Michigan: A policy dialogue, white paper B: Legal barriers to intergovernmental cooperation, “Legal Issues” (Urban Cooperation Act). Retrieved from www.landpolicy.msu.eduen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.