Show simple item record

Emergency department documentation templates: variability in template selection and association with physical examination and test ordering in dizziness presentations

dc.contributor.authorKerber, Kevin A
dc.contributor.authorHofer, Timothy P
dc.contributor.authorMeurer, William J
dc.contributor.authorMark Fendrick, A
dc.contributor.authorMorgenstern, Lewis B
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-07T17:31:28Z
dc.date.available2015-08-07T17:31:28Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-24
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2011 Mar 24;11(1):65
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112490en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Clinical documentation systems, such as templates, have been associated with process utilization. The T-System emergency department (ED) templates are widely used but lacking are analyses of the templates association with processes. This system is also unique because of the many different template options available, and thus the selection of the template may also be important. We aimed to describe the selection of templates in ED dizziness presentations and to investigate the association between items on templates and process utilization. Methods Dizziness visits were captured from a population-based study of EDs that use documentation templates. Two relevant process outcomes were assessed: head computerized tomography (CT) scan and nystagmus examination. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of each outcome for patients who did or did not receive a relevant-item template. Propensity scores were also used to adjust for selection effects. Results The final cohort was 1,485 visits. Thirty-one different templates were used. Use of a template with a head CT item was associated with an increase in the adjusted probability of head CT utilization from 12.2% (95% CI, 8.9%-16.6%) to 29.3% (95% CI, 26.0%-32.9%). The adjusted probability of documentation of a nystagmus assessment increased from 12.0% (95%CI, 8.8%-16.2%) when a nystagmus-item template was not used to 95.0% (95% CI, 92.8%-96.6%) when a nystagmus-item template was used. The associations remained significant after propensity score adjustments. Conclusions Providers use many different templates in dizziness presentations. Important differences exist in the various templates and the template that is used likely impacts process utilization, even though selection may be arbitrary. The optimal design and selection of templates may offer a feasible and effective opportunity to improve care delivery.
dc.titleEmergency department documentation templates: variability in template selection and association with physical examination and test ordering in dizziness presentations
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112490/1/12913_2010_Article_1586.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-11-65en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderKerber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2015-08-07T17:31:28Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.