Show simple item record

Design of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients

dc.contributor.authorChen, Jane
dc.contributor.authorWilkoff, Bruce L
dc.contributor.authorChoucair, Wassim
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Todd J
dc.contributor.authorCrossley, George H
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, W B
dc.contributor.authorMongeon, Luc R
dc.contributor.authorSerwer, Gerald A
dc.contributor.authorSherfesee, Lou
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-07T17:34:31Z
dc.date.available2015-08-07T17:34:31Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-03
dc.identifier.citationTrials. 2008 Apr 03;9(1):18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112561en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Although pacemakers are primarily used for the treatment of bradycardia, diagnostic data available in current pacemakers allow them to be also used as sophisticated, continuous monitoring devices. Easy access to these stored data may assist clinicians in making diagnostic and therapeutic decisions sooner, thus avoiding potential long-term sequelae due to untreated clinical disorders. Internet-based remote device interrogation systems provide clinicians with frequent and complete access to stored data in pacemakers. In addition to monitoring device function, remote monitors may be a helpful tool in assisting physicians in the management of common arrhythmia disorders. Methods The Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial is a prospective, randomized, parallel, unblinded, multicenter, open label clinical trial to determine the utility of remote pacemaker interrogation in the earlier diagnosis of clinically actionable events compared to the existing practice of transtelephonic monitoring. There have been 980 patients enrolled and randomized to receive pacemaker follow up with either remote interrogation using the Medtronic CareLink® Network (CareLink) versus the conventional method of transtelephonic monitoring (TTM) in addition to periodic in-person interrogation and programming evaluations. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the design of the PREFER trial. The results, to be presented separately, will characterize the number of clinically actionable events as a result of pacemaker follow-up using remote interrogation instead of TTM. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00294645.
dc.titleDesign of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112561/1/13063_2008_Article_231.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1745-6215-9-18en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderChen et al.
dc.date.updated2015-08-07T17:34:31Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.