The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development
dc.contributor.author | Gagnier, Joel J | |
dc.contributor.author | Kienle, Gunver | |
dc.contributor.author | Altman, Douglas G | |
dc.contributor.author | Moher, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Sox, Harold | |
dc.contributor.author | Riley, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-07T17:37:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-07T17:37:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-09-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2013 Sep 10;7(1):223 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112624 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background A case report is a narrative that describes, for medical, scientific, or educational purposes, a medical problem experienced by one or more patients. Case reports written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. Primary Objective. Develop, disseminate, and implement systematic reporting guidelines for case reports. Methods We used a three-phase consensus process consisting of (1) pre-meeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, (2) a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guidelines, and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines. Results This consensus process involved 27 participants and resulted in a 13-item checklist—a reporting guideline for case reports. The primary items of the checklist are title, key words, abstract, introduction, patient information, clinical findings, timeline, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic interventions, follow-up and outcomes, discussion, patient perspective, and informed consent. Conclusions We believe the implementation of the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines by medical journals will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports will inform clinical study design, provide early signals of effectiveness and harms, and improve healthcare delivery. | |
dc.title | The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112624/1/13256_2013_Article_2617.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1752-1947-7-223 | en_US |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
dc.rights.holder | Gagnier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-08-07T17:37:05Z | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.