Show simple item record

Integrating an internet-mediated walking program into family medicine clinical practice: a pilot feasibility study

dc.contributor.authorGoodrich, David E
dc.contributor.authorBuis, Lorraine R
dc.contributor.authorJanney, Adrienne W
dc.contributor.authorDitty, Megan D
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Christine W
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Kai
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ananda
dc.contributor.authorStrecher, Victor J
dc.contributor.authorHess, Michael L
dc.contributor.authorPiette, John D
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Caroline R
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-07T17:44:44Z
dc.date.available2015-08-07T17:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-24
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2011 Jun 24;11(1):47
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112805en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Regular participation in physical activity can prevent many chronic health conditions. Computerized self-management programs are effective clinical tools to support patient participation in physical activity. This pilot study sought to develop and evaluate an online interface for primary care providers to refer patients to an Internet-mediated walking program called Stepping Up to Health (SUH) and to monitor participant progress in the program. Methods In Phase I of the study, we recruited six pairs of physicians and medical assistants from two family practice clinics to assist with the design of a clinical interface. During Phase II, providers used the developed interface to refer patients to a six-week pilot intervention. Provider perspectives were assessed regarding the feasibility of integrating the program into routine care. Assessment tools included quantitative and qualitative data gathered from semi-structured interviews, surveys, and online usage logs. Results In Phase I, 13 providers used SUH and participated in two interviews. Providers emphasized the need for alerts flagging patients who were not doing well and the ability to review participant progress. Additionally, providers asked for summary views of data across all enrolled clinic patients as well as advertising materials for intervention recruitment. In response to this input, an interface was developed containing three pages: 1) a recruitment page, 2) a summary page, and 3) a detailed patient page. In Phase II, providers used the interface to refer 139 patients to SUH and 37 (27%) enrolled in the intervention. Providers rarely used the interface to monitor enrolled patients. Barriers to regular use of the intervention included lack of integration with the medical record system, competing priorities, patient disinterest, and physician unease with exercise referrals. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that patients increased walking by an average of 1493 steps/day from pre- to post-intervention (t = (36) = 4.13, p < 0.01). Conclusions Providers successfully referred patients using the SUH provider interface, but were less willing to monitor patient compliance in the program. Patients who completed the program significantly increased their step counts. Future research is needed to test the effectiveness of integrating SUH with clinical information systems over a longer evaluation period.
dc.titleIntegrating an internet-mediated walking program into family medicine clinical practice: a pilot feasibility study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112805/1/12911_2010_Article_419.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6947-11-47en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderGoodrich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2015-08-07T17:44:44Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.