View Item 

Show simple item record

Coupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planning
dc.contributor.authorAger, Alan A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKline, Jeffrey D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFischer, A. Paigeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T19:30:17Z
dc.date.available2016-09-06T15:43:59Zen
dc.date.issued2015-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationAger, Alan A.; Kline, Jeffrey D.; Fischer, A. Paige (2015). "Coupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planning." Risk Analysis 35(8): 1393-1406.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0272-4332en_US
dc.identifier.issn1539-6924en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113114
dc.publisherUSDA Forest Serviceen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherwildfire risk mitigationen_US
dc.subject.othersocioecological planningen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity wildfire protectionen_US
dc.titleCoupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economicsen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113114/1/risa12373.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/risa.12373en_US
dc.identifier.sourceRisk Analysisen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrenkert‐Smith H. Building bridges to fight fire: The role of informal social interactions in six Colorado wildland–urban interface communities. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2010; 19 ( 6 ): 689 – 697.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBascompte J. Disentangling the web of life. Science, 2009; 325: 416 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCumming GS, Bodin Ö, Ernstson H, Elmqvist T. Network analysis in conservation biogeography: Challenges and opportunities. Diversity and Distributions, 2010; 16: 414 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBodin O, Crona B, Ernstson H. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective ? Ecology and Society, 2006; 11 ( 2 ):r2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Day MA, Finney MA, Vance‐Borland K, Vaillant NM. Analyzing the transmission of wildfire exposure on a fire‐prone landscape in Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014; 334: 337 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources, 2005; 18 ( 1 ): 17 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen‐Pincus M. Mapping a values typology in three counties of the interior Northwest, USA: Scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Society and Natural Resources, 2011; 24 ( 6 ): 535 – 552.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpies TA, White EM, Kline JD, Fischer AP, Ager A, Bailey J, Bolte J, Koch J, Platt E, Olsen CS, Jacobs D, Shindler B, Steen‐Adams MM, Hammer R. Examining fire‐prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society, 2014; 19 ( 3 ): 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcHugh CW. Considerations in the use of models available for fuel treatment analysis. Pp. 81 – 105 in Andrews PL, Butler BW (eds). Fuels Management—How to Measure Success. Proceedings RMRS‐P‐41, 28–30 March 2006. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStratton RD. Guidance on Spatial Wildland Fire Analysis: Models, Tools, and Techniques. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Report No.: RMRS‐GTR‐183, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA. Integrating fire behavior models and geospatial analysis for wildland fire risk assessment and fuel management planning. Journal of Combustion, 2011; Article ID 572452:19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSRA. Society for Risk Analysis. 2006. Available at: http://www.sra.org/, Accessed November 26, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer AP. Reducing hazardous fuels on nonindustrial private forests: Factors influencing landowner decisions. Journal of Forestry, 2011; 109 ( 5 ): 260 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCruz MG, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Sims NC, Bannister AJ, Hollis JJ, Hurley RJ. Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: The Black Saturday Kilmore East Fire in Victoria, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012; 284: 269 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce SM, Cowling RM, Knight AT, Lombard AT, Rouget M, Wolf T. Systematic conservation planning products for land‐use planning: Interpretation for implementation. Biological Conservation, 2005; 125 ( 4 ): 441 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research‐implementation gap. Conservation Biology, 2008; 22: 610 – 617.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalis M, Ager A, Arca B, Finney MA, Bacciu V, Duce P, Spano D. Assessing exposure of human and ecological values to wildfire in Sardinia, Italy. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2012; 22 ( 4 ): 549 – 565.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandes U, Wagner D. Analysis and visualization of social networks. Pp. 321 – 340 in Jünger M, Mutzel P (eds). Graph Drawing Software. Berlin: Springer, 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaliana‐Martin L, Herrero G, Solana J. A wildland‐urban interface typology for forest fire risk management in Mediterranean areas. Landscape Research, 2011; 36 ( 2 ): 151 – 171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAttiwill P, Binkley D. Exploring the mega‐fire reality: A “Forest Ecology and Management” conference. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013; 294: 1 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey D. National dialogue needed about WUI fires. Wildfire, 2013; September/October: 6 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSDA Forest Service. National Wildfire Management Report to Congress and Cohesive Strategy. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSDA‐USDI. The National Strategy: The Final Phase in the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy, 2014, Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/documents/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf, Acessed March 25, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorotis RB, Hammel EM. Multi‐attribute aspects for risk assessment of natural hazards. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2010; 14 ( 6 ): 437 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuchs S, Kuhlicke C, Meyer V. Editorial for the special issue: Vulnerability to natural hazards—The challenge of integration. Natural Hazards, 2011; 58 ( 2 ): 609 – 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasperson RE, Kasperson JX. The social amplification and attenuation of risk. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, 1996; 545: 95 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19 ( 4 ): 689 – 701.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindell MK, Perry RW. The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32 ( 4 ): 616 – 632.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrillinger DR, Preisler HK, Benoit J. Probabilistic risk assessment for wildfires. Environmetrics, 2006; 17: 623 – 633.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones JM, Corotis RB. The regional consequences of individual natural hazard events. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2012; 16: 78 – 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Aalst MK, Cannon T, Burton I. Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 2008; 18 ( 1 ): 165 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEverett Y, Fuller M. Fire safe councils in the interface. Society and Natural Resources, 2011; 24: 319 – 333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoser SC, Ekstrom JA. Taking ownership of climate change: Participatory adaptation planning in two local case studies from California. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2011; 1 ( 1 ): 63 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams DR, Jakes PJ, Burns S, Cheng AS, Nelson KC, Sturtevant V, Brummel RF, Staycock E, Souter SG. Community wildfire protection planning: The importance of framing, scale, and building sustainable capacity. Journal of Forestry, 2012; 110 ( 8 ): 415 – 420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKondolf GM, Podolak K. Space and time scales in human‐landscape systems. Environmental Management, 2014; 53 ( 1 ): 76 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuerrero AM, McAllister RRJ, Corcoran J, Wilson KA. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social‐network analyses. Conservation Biology, 2013; 27 ( 1 ): 34 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCaffrey S. Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Society and Natural Resources, 2004; 6 ( 17 ): 509 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA, Preisler HK. Analyzing wildfire exposure and source–sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012; 267 ( 1 ): 271 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams J. Exploring the onset of high‐impact mega‐fires through a forest land management prism. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013; 294: 4 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFall JJ. Planning protected areas across boundaries: New paradigms and old ghosts. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2003; 17: 81 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell RB. Developing institutions to overcome governance barriers to ecoregional conservation. Pp. 53 – 66 in Trombulak, SC, Baldwin RF (eds). Landscape‐Scale Conservation Planning. Netherlands: Springer, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills M, Álvarez‐Romero JG, Vance‐Borland K, Cohen P, Pressey RL, Guerrero AM, Ernston H. Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 2013; 169: 6 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenaud FG, Birkmann J, Damm M, Gallopin GC. Understanding multiple thresholds of coupled social‐ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as external shocks. Natural Hazards, 2010; 55 ( 3 ): 749 – 763.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpies TA, White EM, Kline JD, Fischer AP, Ager A, Bailey J, Bolte J, Koch J, Platt E, Olsen CS, Jacobs D, Shindler B, Steen‐Adams MM, Hammer R. Challenges and a checklist for biodiversity conservation in fire‐prone forests: Perspectives from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Southeastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 2012; 145 ( 1 ): 5 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSDA‐USDI. National Fire Plan. A Collaborative Approach for Reducing Wildland Fire Risks to Communities and the Environment. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture‐United States Department of Interior, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003. Public Law. 2003; 108 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Fire Protection Association. About Firewise. Available at: http://www.firewise.org/about.aspx?sso=0, Accessed 21 January 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLampin‐Maillet C, Jappiot M, Long M, Morge D, Ferrier JP. Mapping wildland‐urban interfaces at large scales integrating housing density and vegetation aggregation for fire prevention in the South of France. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010; 91: 732 – 741.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLampin‐Maillet C, Jappiot M, Long M, Morge D, Ferrier JP. Characterization and mapping of dwelling types for forest fire prevention. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, 2009; 33: 224 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF. The wildland‐urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 2005; 15: 799 – 805.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakes PJ, Nelson KC, Enzler SA, Burns S, Cheng AS, Sturtevant V, Williams DR, Bujak A, Brummel RF, Grayzeck‐Souter S, Staychock E. Community wildfire protection planning: Is the Healthy Forests Restoration Act's vagueness genius ? International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2011; 20 ( 3 ): 350 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J. The wildland‐urban interface fire problem. Fremontia, 2010; 38: 16 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen JD. Preventing disaster: Home ignitability in the wildland‐urban interface. Journal of Forestry, 2000; 98 ( 3 ): 15 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaballero D. Wildland‐urban interface fire risk management: WARM project. In González‐Cabán (ed). Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning and Policy: A Global View. Albany, CA: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham R, Finney M, McHugh C, Cohen J, Calkin D, Stratton R, Bradshaw L, Nikolov N. Fourmile Canyon Fire Findings. Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Report No.: RMRS‐GTR‐289, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleeger WE, Becker ML. Decision processes for multijurisdictional planning and management: Community wildfire protection planning in Oregon. Society & Natural Resources, 2010; 23 ( 4 ): 351 – 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller C, Ager AA. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2012; 22 ( 1 ): 1 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCWPP Task Force. Community Guide to Preparing and Implementing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2008. Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/communi‐ties/documents/CWPP_Report_Aug2008.pdf, Accessed 21 January 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Day MA, Finney MA, Vance‐Borland K, Vaillant NM. Analyzing the transmission of wildfire exposure on a fire‐prone landscape in Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014; 334: 337 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Finney MA, Vaillant NM. Analyzing the spatial transmission of wildfire risk from large fires. Pp. 108 – 113 in Spano D, Bacciu V, Salis M, et al. (eds). Modelling Fire Behaviour and Risk. Alghero, Italy: Nuova StampColor, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer AP, Charnley S. Risk and cooperation: Managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environmental Management, 2012; 49 ( 6 ): 1192 – 1207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaveglio T, Jakes P, Carroll M, Williams D. Understanding social complexity within the wildland–urban interface: A new species of human habitation ? Environmental Management, 2009; 43 ( 6 ): 1085 – 1095.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaveglio T, Moseley C, Matthew MSC, Williams Dr, Davis EJ, Fischer AR. Categorizing the social context of the wildland urban interface: Adaptive capacity for wildfire and community “archetypes,” Forest Science, 2015: 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer AP, Kline JD, Ager AA, Charnley S, Olsen KA. Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners’ fuel reduction activities in Oregon's (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2014; 23 ( 1 ): 143 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch L, Lovell SJ. Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land reservation programs. Land Economics, 2003; 79 ( 2 ): 259 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePocewicz A, Nielsen‐Pincus M, Goldberg C, Johnson M, Morgan P, Force J, Waits L, Vierling L. Predicting land use change: Comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends. Landscape Ecology, 2008; 23 ( 2 ): 195 – 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaither CJ, Poudyal NC, Goodrick S, Bowker JM, Malone S, Gan J. Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the southeastern United States: An exploratory spatial data analysis approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 2011; 13 ( 1 ): 24 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOjerio R, Moseley C, Lynn K, Bania N. Limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona. Natural Hazards Review, 2011; 12 ( 1 ): 28 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL. Scale mismatches in social‐ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society, 2006; 11 ( 1 ):14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandres PB, Knight RL, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. Ecological effects of administrative boundaries. Pp. 39 – 64 in Knight RL, Landres PB (eds). Stewardship Across Boundaries. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, Moffett A, Wilson KA, Williams KJ, Williams PH, Andelman S. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006; 31: 123 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheng AS, Daniels SE. Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: A case study of place‐based collaborative planning. Forest Science, 2003; 49 ( 6 ): 841 – 854.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakes P, Burns S, Cheng A, Saeli E, Nelson K, Brummel R, Grayzeck S, Sturtevant V, Williams D. Critical elements in the development and implementation of community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs). In Butler BW, Cook W (eds). The Fire Environment—Innovations, Management and Policy; Conference Proceedings. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinney MA. An overview of FlamMap fire modeling capabilities. Pp. 213–220 in Andrews PL, Butler BW (eds). Fuels Management—How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings. Proceedings RMRS‐P‐41, March 28–30, 2006. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinney MA, McHugh CW, Grenfell IC, Riley KL, Short KC. A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2011; 25: 973 – 1000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAger AA, Day MA, McHugh CW, Short K, Gilbertson‐Day J, Finney MA, Calkin DE. Wildfire exposure and fuel management on western US national forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014; 145: 54 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakes PJ, Nelson KC, Enzler SA, Burns S, Cheng AS, Sturtevant V, Williams DR, Bujak A, Brummel RF, Grayzeck‐Souter S, Staychock E. Community wildfire protection planning: Is the Healthy Forests Restoration Act's vagueness genius ? International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2011; 20: 350 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinor ES, Urban DL. A graph‐theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 2008; 22: 297 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKininmonth S, Berger M, Bode M, Peterson E, Adams VM, Dorfman D, Brumbaugh DR, Possingham HP. Dispersal connectivity and reserve selection for marine conservation. Ecological Modelling, 2011; 222: 1272 – 1282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRayfield B, Fortin MJ, Fall A. Connectivity for conservation: A framework to classify network measures. Ecology, 2011; 92 ( 4 ): 847 – 858.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoltête JC, Giradet X, Clauzel C. A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land‐use planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014; 124: 140 – 150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValente TW. Network interventions. Science, 2012; 337: 49 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles J. Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire‐excluded forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry, 2010; 108: 24 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer AP, Kline JD, Ager AA, Charnley S, Olsen KA. Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners’ fuel reduction activities in Oregon's (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2014; 23: 143 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohn PJ, Williams DR, Carroll MS. Wildland‐urban interface residents’ views on risk and attribution. Pp. 23 – 43 in Martin, WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds). Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon JS, Luloff A, Stedman RC. A multisite qualitative comparison of community wildfire risk perceptions. Journal of Forestry, 2012; 110 ( 2 ): 74 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChamp PA, Donovan GH, Barth CM. Living in a tinderbox: Wildfire risk perceptions and mitigating behaviours. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2013; 22 ( 6 ): 832 – 840.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBodin Ö, Tengö M. Disentangling intangible social‐ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 2012; 22: 430 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrenkert‐Smith H, Dickinson KL, Champ PA, Flores N. Social amplification of wildfire risk: The role of social interactions and information sources. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33 ( 5 ): 800 – 817.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButler WH, Goldstein BE. The US Fire Learning Network: Springing a rigidity trap through multiscalar collaborative networks. Ecology and Society, 2010; 15 ( 3 ): 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSDA‐USDI. National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy 2015. Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/index.shtml, Accessed March 25, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein BE, Butler WH. The U.S. Fire Learning Network: Providing a narrative framework for restoring ecosystems, professions, and institutions. Society & Natural Resources, 2010; 23 ( 10 ): 935 – 951.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWildland Fire Leadership Council. A National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy: Western Regional Assessment and Strategy. Wildland Fire Leadership Council, 2011. Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/leadership/documents/wfec/meetings/04nov2011/regreports_presentations/phase2_report_wrsc20110930.pdf, Accessed March 25, 2015.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
risa12373.pdf
Size:
1.144MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.