Show simple item record

Fluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease

dc.contributor.authorDeWitt, Aaron G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZampi, Jeffrey D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDonohue, Janet E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Sunkyungen_US
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Thomas R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T19:30:58Z
dc.date.available2016-08-08T16:18:39Zen
dc.date.issued2015-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationDeWitt, Aaron G.; Zampi, Jeffrey D.; Donohue, Janet E.; Yu, Sunkyung; Lloyd, Thomas R. (2015). "Fluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease." Congenital Heart Disease (4): 317-325.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-079Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-0803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113170
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to (1) describe the technical aspects of fluoroscopy‐guided umbilical venous catheter placement (FGUVCP); and (2) determine the procedural success rate, factors contributing to procedural failure, and risks of the procedure.BackgroundUmbilical venous catheters are advantageous compared with femoral venous access, but can be difficult to place at the bedside.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective chart review from a single tertiary care referral institution.ResultsFGUVCP was successful in 138 of 180 patients (76.7%) over a seven‐year period. Patients in whom FGUVCP was successful were younger at the time of procedure compared with patients in whom FGUVCP was unsuccessful (median 18.2 vs. 22.2 hours, P = .03). The optimal age cutoff to predict FGUVCP success was 20 hours with a high positive predictive value (82.4%) but low negative predictive value (32.5%). No other variables were associated with procedural failure, though functional univentricular heart and older gestational age trended toward statistical significance. Median radiation time, contrast exposure, and blood loss were 3.2 minutes, 1 mL, and 1 mL, respectively. A total of 10 complications in 10 patients were associated with FGUVCP.ConclusionsFGUVCP is a safe and highly successful way to obtain central venous access in neonates with congenital heart disease. Older age at the time of procedure is associated with procedural failure, but utilization of an age cutoff may not be clinically useful.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherCentral Venous Accessen_US
dc.subject.otherUmbilical Veinen_US
dc.subject.otherCatheterizationen_US
dc.subject.otherDuctus Venosusen_US
dc.titleFluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113170/1/chd12233.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/chd.12233en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCongenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAiyagari R, Song JY, Donohue JE, Yu S, Gaies M. Central venous catheter‐associated complications in infants with single ventricle: comparison of umbilical and femoral venous access routes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012; 13: 549 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOestreich A. Umbilical vein catheterization—Appropriate and inappropriate placement. Pediatr Radiol. 2010; 40: 1941 – 1949.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiserud T. The ductus venosus. Semin Perinatol. 2001; 25: 11 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanders CF. The placement of the umbilical venous catheter in the newborn and its relationship to the anatomy of the umbilical vein, ductus venosus and portal venous system. Clin Radiol. 1978; 29: 303 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaase R, Hein M, Thäle V, Vilser C, Merkel N. Umbilical venous catheters—analysis of malpositioning over a 10‐year period. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2011; 215: 18 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePennaforte T, Klosowski S, Alexandre C, Ghesquière J, Rakza T, Storme L. Increased success rate in umbilical venous catheter positioning by posterior liver mobilization. Arch Pediatr. 2010; 17: 1440 – 1444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandel D, Mimouni F, Littner Y, Dollberg S. Double catheter technique for misdirected umbilical vein catheter. J Pediatr. 2001; 139: 591 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl‐Essa M, Rashwan N, Devarajan L. Double‐catheter technique for the proper insertion of umbilical venous catheters in newborns. Med Princ Pract. 2005; 14: 98 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies M, Cartwright D. Insertion of umbilical venous catheters past the ductus venosus using the double catheter technique. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998; 78: 234.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimanovsky N, Ofek‐Shlomai N, Rozovsky K, Ergaz‐Shaltiel Z, Hiller N, Bar‐Oz B. Umbilical venous catheter position: evaluation by ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2011; 9: 1882 – 1886.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdes A, Sable C, Cummings S, Cross R, Markle B, Martin G. Echocardiographic evaluation of umbilical venous catheter placement. J Perinatol. 2003; 23: 24 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge L, Waldman J, Cohen M, et al. Umbilical vascular catheters: localization by two‐dimensional echocardio/aortography. Pediatr Cardiol. 1982; 2: 237 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg M, Movahed H, Peterson B, Bejar R. Placement of umbilical venous catheters with use of bedside real‐time ultrasonography. J Pediatr. 1995; 126: 633 – 635.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsui B, Richards GJ, Van Aerde J. Umbilical vein catheterization under electrocardiogram guidance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005; 15: 297 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoisel D, Smith M, MacDonald M, Martin G. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. J Perinatol. 1996; 16: 461 – 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBracho‐Blanchet E, Cortes‐Sauza J, Davila‐Perez R, Lezama‐Del V, Villalobos‐Alfaro C, Nieto‐Zermeño J. Usefulness of intravenous heparin to prevent thrombosis of central venous catheter in children. Cir Cir. 2010; 78: 423 – 429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchroeder AR, Axelrod DM, Silverman NH, Rubesova E, Merkel E, Roth SJ. A continuous heparin infusion does not prevent catheter‐related thrombosis in infants after cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010; 11: 489 – 495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonstadt SN, Louie EK, Black S, et al. Intraoperative detection of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 1991; 74: 212 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarzilai B, Waggoner AD, Spessert C, Picus D, Goodenberger D. Two‐dimensional contrast echocardiography in the detection and follow‐up of congenital pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 1507 – 1510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalinkas A, Nagy E, Forster T, Nagy E, Varga A. A case of absent right and persistent left superior vena cava. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2006; 4: 6 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker DH, Berdon WE, James LS. Proper localization of umbilical arterial and venous catheters by lateral roentgenograms. Pediatrics. 1969; 43: 34 – 39.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.