Fluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease
dc.contributor.author | DeWitt, Aaron G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zampi, Jeffrey D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Donohue, Janet E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Sunkyung | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lloyd, Thomas R. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-01T19:30:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-08T16:18:39Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2015-07 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | DeWitt, Aaron G.; Zampi, Jeffrey D.; Donohue, Janet E.; Yu, Sunkyung; Lloyd, Thomas R. (2015). "Fluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease." Congenital Heart Disease (4): 317-325. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1747-079X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1747-0803 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113170 | |
dc.description.abstract | ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to (1) describe the technical aspects of fluoroscopy‐guided umbilical venous catheter placement (FGUVCP); and (2) determine the procedural success rate, factors contributing to procedural failure, and risks of the procedure.BackgroundUmbilical venous catheters are advantageous compared with femoral venous access, but can be difficult to place at the bedside.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective chart review from a single tertiary care referral institution.ResultsFGUVCP was successful in 138 of 180 patients (76.7%) over a seven‐year period. Patients in whom FGUVCP was successful were younger at the time of procedure compared with patients in whom FGUVCP was unsuccessful (median 18.2 vs. 22.2 hours, P = .03). The optimal age cutoff to predict FGUVCP success was 20 hours with a high positive predictive value (82.4%) but low negative predictive value (32.5%). No other variables were associated with procedural failure, though functional univentricular heart and older gestational age trended toward statistical significance. Median radiation time, contrast exposure, and blood loss were 3.2 minutes, 1 mL, and 1 mL, respectively. A total of 10 complications in 10 patients were associated with FGUVCP.ConclusionsFGUVCP is a safe and highly successful way to obtain central venous access in neonates with congenital heart disease. Older age at the time of procedure is associated with procedural failure, but utilization of an age cutoff may not be clinically useful. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Central Venous Access | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Umbilical Vein | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Catheterization | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Ductus Venosus | en_US |
dc.title | Fluoroscopy‐guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113170/1/chd12233.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/chd.12233 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Congenital Heart Disease | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Aiyagari R, Song JY, Donohue JE, Yu S, Gaies M. Central venous catheter‐associated complications in infants with single ventricle: comparison of umbilical and femoral venous access routes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012; 13: 549 – 553. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oestreich A. Umbilical vein catheterization—Appropriate and inappropriate placement. Pediatr Radiol. 2010; 40: 1941 – 1949. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kiserud T. The ductus venosus. Semin Perinatol. 2001; 25: 11 – 20. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sanders CF. The placement of the umbilical venous catheter in the newborn and its relationship to the anatomy of the umbilical vein, ductus venosus and portal venous system. Clin Radiol. 1978; 29: 303 – 308. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Haase R, Hein M, Thäle V, Vilser C, Merkel N. Umbilical venous catheters—analysis of malpositioning over a 10‐year period. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2011; 215: 18 – 22. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pennaforte T, Klosowski S, Alexandre C, Ghesquière J, Rakza T, Storme L. Increased success rate in umbilical venous catheter positioning by posterior liver mobilization. Arch Pediatr. 2010; 17: 1440 – 1444. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mandel D, Mimouni F, Littner Y, Dollberg S. Double catheter technique for misdirected umbilical vein catheter. J Pediatr. 2001; 139: 591 – 592. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Al‐Essa M, Rashwan N, Devarajan L. Double‐catheter technique for the proper insertion of umbilical venous catheters in newborns. Med Princ Pract. 2005; 14: 98 – 101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davies M, Cartwright D. Insertion of umbilical venous catheters past the ductus venosus using the double catheter technique. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998; 78: 234. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simanovsky N, Ofek‐Shlomai N, Rozovsky K, Ergaz‐Shaltiel Z, Hiller N, Bar‐Oz B. Umbilical venous catheter position: evaluation by ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2011; 9: 1882 – 1886. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ades A, Sable C, Cummings S, Cross R, Markle B, Martin G. Echocardiographic evaluation of umbilical venous catheter placement. J Perinatol. 2003; 23: 24 – 28. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | George L, Waldman J, Cohen M, et al. Umbilical vascular catheters: localization by two‐dimensional echocardio/aortography. Pediatr Cardiol. 1982; 2: 237 – 243. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Greenberg M, Movahed H, Peterson B, Bejar R. Placement of umbilical venous catheters with use of bedside real‐time ultrasonography. J Pediatr. 1995; 126: 633 – 635. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tsui B, Richards GJ, Van Aerde J. Umbilical vein catheterization under electrocardiogram guidance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005; 15: 297 – 300. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Loisel D, Smith M, MacDonald M, Martin G. Intravenous access in newborn infants: impact of extended umbilical venous catheter use on requirement for peripheral venous lines. J Perinatol. 1996; 16: 461 – 466. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bracho‐Blanchet E, Cortes‐Sauza J, Davila‐Perez R, Lezama‐Del V, Villalobos‐Alfaro C, Nieto‐Zermeño J. Usefulness of intravenous heparin to prevent thrombosis of central venous catheter in children. Cir Cir. 2010; 78: 423 – 429. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schroeder AR, Axelrod DM, Silverman NH, Rubesova E, Merkel E, Roth SJ. A continuous heparin infusion does not prevent catheter‐related thrombosis in infants after cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010; 11: 489 – 495. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Konstadt SN, Louie EK, Black S, et al. Intraoperative detection of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 1991; 74: 212 – 216. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Barzilai B, Waggoner AD, Spessert C, Picus D, Goodenberger D. Two‐dimensional contrast echocardiography in the detection and follow‐up of congenital pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 1507 – 1510. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Palinkas A, Nagy E, Forster T, Nagy E, Varga A. A case of absent right and persistent left superior vena cava. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2006; 4: 6 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baker DH, Berdon WE, James LS. Proper localization of umbilical arterial and venous catheters by lateral roentgenograms. Pediatrics. 1969; 43: 34 – 39. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.