Menís Endorsement of Monogamy: The Role of Gendered Relationship Scripts on Beliefs about Committed Relationships, Love, and Romance.
dc.contributor.author | Moors, Amy Catherine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-30T14:25:01Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-30T14:25:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113611 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present studies examined whether men disapprove of monogamy or if men simply disapprove gendered relationship scripts regarding monogamy to which there are expected to adhere. In Studies 1a and 1b, I found that partnered men report frustration with relationship scripts regarding initiating romantic events. In Study 2, I found that men are responsible for orchestrating engagement proposals and Valentine’s Day festivities, whereas women are responsible for weddings. In Studies 3-5, I examined the effects of gendered relationship scripts on people’s beliefs about committed relationships, sexual and romantic exclusivity, and romance. In Study 3, men and women who were single or in a monogamous relationship responded to monogamy-related items and reported their emotional reactions after viewing common steps to prepare for an engagement proposal, wedding, or surprise birthday party. In two subtle priming studies, men and women responded to monogamy-related items after viewing engagement proposal or landscape photographs (Study 4 included single and partnered participants) or on Valentine’s Day or April 10th (Study 5 included partnered participants). When gendered relationship scripts were salient (via engagement proposal or Valentine’s Day ideals), partnered men, but not single men, reported lower endorsement of the committed relationship ideology and sexual/romantic exclusivity as compared to partnered men and women in the control conditions and women in the high salience condition. Women’s attitudes were unaffected by gendered relationship script salience; their attitudes were also unaffected by relationship script salience unique to them (wedding planning in Study 3). Study 3 confirmed that heightened negative affect (feeling frustrated, overwhelmed, annoyed) accounted for why partnered men in the high gendered relationship script salience condition reported less endorsement of monogamy. Taken together, partnered men endorse monogamy, but not their gendered relationship scripts associated with monogamy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | dating and relationship scripts | en_US |
dc.subject | romantic relationships | en_US |
dc.subject | gender and endorsement of monogamy | en_US |
dc.title | Menís Endorsement of Monogamy: The Role of Gendered Relationship Scripts on Beliefs about Committed Relationships, Love, and Romance. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Psychology and Women's Studies | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Conley, Terri Diane | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Keller-Cohen, Deborah | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Edelstein, Robin Stacey | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Earl, Allison Nancy | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Women's and Gender Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113611/1/amymoors_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.