View Item 

Show simple item record

Historical Matching Strategies in Kidney Paired Donation: The 7‐Year Evolution of a Web‐Based Virtual Matching System
dc.contributor.authorFumo, D. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKapoor, V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReece, L. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStepkowski, S. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKopke, J. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRees, S. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoth, A. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeichtman, A. B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRees, M. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:42:45Z
dc.date.available2016-12-01T14:33:06Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationFumo, D. E.; Kapoor, V.; Reece, L. J.; Stepkowski, S. M.; Kopke, J. E.; Rees, S. E.; Smith, C.; Roth, A. E.; Leichtman, A. B.; Rees, M. A. (2015). "Historical Matching Strategies in Kidney Paired Donation: The 7‐Year Evolution of a Web‐Based Virtual Matching System." American Journal of Transplantation 15(10): 2646-2654.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113715
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherkidney transplantation/nephrologyen_US
dc.subject.otherhistocompatibilityen_US
dc.titleHistorical Matching Strategies in Kidney Paired Donation: The 7‐Year Evolution of a Web‐Based Virtual Matching Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113715/1/ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S2.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113715/2/ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S3.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113715/3/ajt13337.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113715/4/ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajt.13337en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole E, Malik S. Foundations and principles of the Canadian living donor paired exchange program. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2014; 1: 6 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrwin FD, Bonagura AF, Crawford SW, Foote M. Kidney paired donation: a payer perspective. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 1388 – 1391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBingaman AW, Wright FH, Jr., Kapturczak M, Shen L, Vick S, Murphey CL. Single‐center kidney paired donation: The methodist San Antonio experience. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2125 – 2132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Stegall MD, Dean PG, et al. Assessing the efficacy of kidney paired donation‐performance of an integrated three‐site program. Transplantation 2014; 98: 300 – 305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRees MA, Kopke JE, Pelletier RP, et al. A nonsimultaneous, extended, altruistic‐donor chain. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1096 – 1101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontgomery RA, Gentry SE, Marks WH, et al. Domino paired kidney donation: A strategy to make best use of live non‐directed donation. Lancet 2006; 368: 419 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshlagi I, Gilchrist DS, Roth AE, Rees MA. Nonsimultaneous chains and dominos in kidney‐paired donation‐revisited. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 984 – 994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGentry SE, Montgomery RA, Swihart BJ, Segev DL. The roles of dominos and nonsimultaneous chains in kidney paired donation. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 1330 – 1336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGentry SE, Segev DL. The honeymoon phase and studies of nonsimultaneous chains in kidney‐paired donation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2778 – 2779. author reply 80–1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshlagi I, Gilchrist DS, Roth AE, Rees M. NEAD Chains in transplantation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth AE, Sonmez T, Unver MU. Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility‐based preferences. Am Eco Rev 2007; 97: 828 – 841.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshlagi I, Roth AE. Free riding and participation in large scale, multi‐hospital kidney exchange. Theoretical Economics. 2014; 9: 817 – 823.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Stegall MD, Dean PG, et al. Assessing the efficacy of kidney paired donation–performance of an integrated three‐site program. Transplantation 2014; 98: 300 – 305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrari P, Fidler S, Wright J, et al. Virtual crossmatch approach to maximize matching in paired kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 272 – 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis TM, Schiller JJ, Roza AM, Cronin DC, Shames BD, Johnson CP. Diagnostic accuracy of solid phase HLA antibody assays for prediction of crossmatch strength. Hum Immunol 2012; 73: 706 – 710.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikaein A, Cherikh W, Nelson K, et al. Organ procurement and transplantation network/united network for organ sharing histocompatibility committee collaborative study to evaluate prediction of crossmatch results in highly sensitized patients. Transplantation 2009; 87: 557 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiazza A, Ozzella G, Poggi E, Caputo D, Manfreda A, Adorno D. Virtual crossmatch in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 46: 2195 – 2198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGombos P, Opelz G, Scherer S, et al. Influence of test technique on sensitization status of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 2075 – 2082.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunter J, Heetun M, Sinha S. Finding the perfect match: The living donor paired exchange system. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2014; 75: 202 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassie AB, Gentry SE, Montgomery RA, Bingaman AA, Segev DL. Center‐level utilization of kidney paired donation. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 1317 – 1322.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTransplant: Donor Relation by Transplant Year (2012‐2013) [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health & Human Resources. 2013 [cited 2014 Dec 29]. Available from: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/rptData.asp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRees MA, Schnitzler MA, Zavala EY, et al. Call to develop a standard acquisition charge model for kidney paired donation. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 1392 – 1397.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTracking Accountability in Government Grants System [Internet]. Health Resources & Services Administration. 2013 [cited 2013 Sept 3]. Available from: https://taggs.hhs.gov/RecipInfo.CFM?SelEin=LCYqSys%2BTF5MQzxLVlM6OEsK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdvisory Committee on Organ Transplantation [Internet]. Human Resources & Services Administration. 2012 [cited 2012 Aug 28]. Available from: http://organdonor.gov/legislation/acotaugust2012notes.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapaport FT. The case for a living emotionally related international kidney donor exchange registry. Transplant Proc 1986; 18(3) Suppl. 2: 5 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwak JY, Kwon OJ, Lee KS, Kang CM, Park HY, Kim JH. Exchange‐donor program in renal transplantation: A single‐center experience. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 344 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelmonico FL, Morrissey PE, Lipkowitz GS, et al. Donor kidney exchanges. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1628 – 1634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth AE, Sonmez T, Unver MU. Kidney exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004; 119: 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontgomery RA, Zachary AA, Ratner LE, et al. Clinical results from transplanting incompatible live kidney donor/recipient pairs using kidney paired donation. JAMA 2005; 294: 1655 – 1663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth AE, Unver MU, Sonmez T. A kidney exchange clearinghouse in New England. Am Econo Rev Pap Proc 2005; 95: 376 – 380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Klerk M, Keizer KM, Claas FH, Witvliet M, Haase‐Kromwijk BJ, Weimar W. The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2302 – 2305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth AE, Sonmez T, Unver MU, Delmonico FL, Saidman SL. Utilizing list exchange and nondirected donation through “chain” paired kidney donations. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2694 – 2705.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanto RL, Reitsma W, Delmonico FL. The development of a successful multiregional kidney paired donation program. Transplantation 2008; 86: 1744 – 1748.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallis CB, Samy KP, Roth AE, Rees MA. Kidney paired donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 2091 – 2099.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher ML, Leeser DB, Gritsch HA, et al. Chain transplantation: Initial experience of a large multicenter program. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2429 – 2436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher ML, Veale JL, Javaid B, et al. Kidney transplant chains amplify benefit of nondirected donors. JAMA Surg 2013; 148: 165 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher ML, Blosser CD, Baxter‐Lowe LA, et al. Dynamic challenges inhibiting optimal adoption of kidney paired donation: Findings of a consensus conference. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 851 – 860.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegev DL, Kucirka LM, Gentry SE, Montgomery RA. Utilization and outcomes of kidney paired donation in the United States. Transplantation 2008; 86: 502 – 510.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S2.pdf
Size:
55.43KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S3.pdf
Size:
51.55KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajt13337.pdf
Size:
1.132MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajt13337-sup-0001-SupTable-S1.pdf
Size:
33.25KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.