View Item 

Show simple item record

Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001‐2009
dc.contributor.authorPaulson, E. Carteren_US
dc.contributor.authorVeenstra, Christine M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVachani, Anilen_US
dc.contributor.authorCiunci, Christine A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEpstein, Andrew J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:43:13Z
dc.date.available2016-12-01T14:33:05Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationPaulson, E. Carter; Veenstra, Christine M.; Vachani, Anil; Ciunci, Christine A.; Epstein, Andrew J. (2015). "Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001‐2009." Cancer 121(19): 3525-3533.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113765
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherepidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.othersurveillanceen_US
dc.subject.otherrectal canceren_US
dc.subject.othercolon canceren_US
dc.subject.otherguideline adherenceen_US
dc.titleTrends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001‐2009en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113765/1/cncr29469.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.29469en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds HL Jr. Receipt of guideline‐recommended follow‐up in older colorectal cancer survivors: a population‐based analysis. Cancer. 2008; 113: 2029 – 2037.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about colorectal cancer? http://www.cancer.org/cancer/colonandrectumcancer/detailedguide/colorectal‐cancer‐key‐statistics. Accessed January 11, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu CY, Delclos GL, Chan W, Du XL. Post‐treatment surveillance in a large cohort of patients with colon cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2011; 17: 329 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunitake H, Zheng P, Yothers G, et al. Routine preventive care and cancer surveillance in long‐term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol LTS‐01. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 5274 – 5279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P. Follow‐up strategies for patients treated for non‐metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002: CD002200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFigueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, et al. Follow‐up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer. 2003; 3: 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2002; 324: 813.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDesch CE, Benson AB III, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 8512 – 8519.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology, rectal cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology, colon cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyerhardt JA, Mangu PB, Flynn PJ, et al. Follow‐up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 4465 – 4470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsikitis VL, Malireddy K, Green EA, et al. Postoperative surveillance recommendations for early stage colon cancer based on results from the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 3671 – 3676.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpentier MY, Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, Murphy CC, Bluethmann SM. Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 7: 464 – 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrawarsky P, Neville BA, Fitzmaurice GM, Earle C, Haas JS. Surveillance after resection for colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2013; 119: 1235 – 1242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER‐Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002; 40 ( 8 suppl ): 3 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53: 1258 – 1267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373 – 383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSurvival, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER stat fact sheets: colon and rectum cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed March 17, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdministration on Aging. A profile of older Americans: 2012. http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/Profile/2012/docs/2012profile.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr29469.pdf
Size:
432.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.