View Item 

Show simple item record

When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculum
dc.contributor.authorHortsch, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMangrulkar, Rajesh S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:43:19Z
dc.date.available2016-10-10T14:50:23Zen
dc.date.issued2015-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationHortsch, Michael; Mangrulkar, Rajesh S. (2015). "When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculum." Anatomical Sciences Education 8(5): 478-483.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9772en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9780en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113778
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherintegrated curriculumen_US
dc.subject.othermedical studentsen_US
dc.subject.otheracademic remediationen_US
dc.subject.otheracademic failureen_US
dc.subject.otherhistology educationen_US
dc.subject.othergross anatomy educationen_US
dc.subject.othermedical educationen_US
dc.subject.othermicroscopic anatomyen_US
dc.subject.othermedical curriculumen_US
dc.titleWhen students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculumen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113778/1/ase1519.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ase.1519en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnatomical Sciences Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrunuske A, Skildum A. 2014. Just‐in‐time remediation of medical students during the preclinical years. Med Sci Educ 24: 103 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindblom‐Ylänne S, Lonka K, Leskinen E. 1996. What predicts success during basic science studies? A cognitive approach. High Educ 31: 507 – 527.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKeown PP, Heylings DJ, Stevenson M, McKelvey KJ, Nixon JR, McCluskey DR. 2003. The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy. Med Educ 37: 954 – 961.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLaughlin K, Veale P, McIlwrick J, de Groot J, Wright B. 2013. A practical approach to mentoring students with repeated performance deficiencies. BMC Med Educ 13: 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller SA, Perrotti W, Silverthorn DU, Dalley AF, Rarey KE. 2002. From college to clinic: Reasoning over memorization is key for understanding anatomy. Anat Rec 269: 69 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. 2008. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: Perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ 42: 778 – 785.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewble DI, Entwistle NJ. 1986. Learning styles and approaches: Implications for medical education. Med Educ 20: 162 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNotzer N, Aronson M. 1979. Differential evaluation of students' performance in histology. All questions are equal but some are more equal than others. Med Educ 13: 79 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlder J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2: 79 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandey P, Zimitat C. 2006. Medical students' learning of anatomy: Memorisation, understanding and visualisation. Med Educ 41: 7 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. 2012. Is short‐term remediation after OSCE failure sustained? A retrospective analysis of the longitudinal attainment of underperforming students in OSCE assessments. Med Teach 34: 146 – 150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyal KD, Kernick ET, Gilliland KO. 2014. Are repeat exam scores trustworthy? A note about measurement error and the need for genuine instructional remediation. Med Sci Educ 24: 39 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSadik A, Rojas L. 2014. How to identify at‐risk medical students based on learning style, personality indicator, and learning strategy tests—A mixed method for a pilot study. Med Sci Educ 24: 111 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheffer C, Tauschel D, Neumann M, Lutz G, Cysarz D, Heusser P, Edelhäuser F. 2012. Integrative medical education: Educational strategies and preliminary evaluation of the Integrated Curriculum for Anthroposophic Medicine (ICURAM). Patient Educ Couns 89: 447 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelvig D, Holaday LW, Purkiss J, Hortsch M. 2015. Correlating students' educational background, study habits, and resource usage with learning success in medical histology. Anat Sci Educ 8: 1 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStegers‐Jager KM, Cohen‐Schotanus J, Splinter TA, Themmen AP. 2011. Academic dismissal policy for medical students: Effect on study progress and help‐seeking behaviour. Med Educ 45: 987 – 994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStegers‐Jager KM, Cohen‐Schotanus J, Themmen AP. 2013. The effect of a short integrated study skills programme for first‐year medical students at risk of failure: A randomised controlled trial. Med Teach 35: 120 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSternberg RJ. 2010. Teach creativity, not memorization. Chron High Educ 57: A29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweeney K, Hayes JA, Chiavaroli N. 2014. Does spatial ability help the learning of anatomy in a biomedical science course? Anat Sci Educ 7: 289 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTekian A, Hruska L. 2004. A review of medical school records to investigate the effectiveness of enrichment programs for “at risk” students. Teach Learn Med 16: 28 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard PJ, Walker JJ. 2008. The influence of study methods and knowledge processing on academic success and long‐term recall of anatomy learning by first‐year veterinary students. Anat Sci Educ 1: 68 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinston KA, Van Der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2010. At‐risk medical students: Implications of students' voice for the theory and practice of remediation. Med Educ 44: 1038 – 1047.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinston KA, Van Der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2013. Remediation of at‐risk medical students: Theory in action. BMC Med Educ 13: 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbali EE, Osheroff N, Buxbaum E, Niederhoffer EC, Symes K, Sanders M. 2014. Evolving role of the basic science course director in an integrated curriculum. Med Sci Educ 24: 349 – 351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAudetat MC, Laurin S, Dory V. 2013. Remediation for struggling learners: Putting an end to ‘more of the same’. Med Educ 47: 230 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBearman M, Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Keating J. 2013. 'Is there a Plan B?': Clinical educators supporting underperforming students in practice settings. Teach High Educ 18: 531 – 544.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns ER, Garrett J. 2015. Student failures on first‐year medical basic science courses and the USMLE Step 1: A retrospective study over a 20‐year period. Anat Sci Educ (in press; doi: 10.1002/ase.1462 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleland J, Leggett H, Sandars J, Costa MJ, Patel R, Moffat M. 2013. The remediation challenge: Theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review. Med Educ 47: 242 – 251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. 2006. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med 355: 1339 – 1344.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoppus SF, Emparanza JI, Hadley J, Kulier R, Weinbrenner S, Arvanitis TN, Burls A, Cabello JB, Decsi T, Horvath AR, Kaczor M, Zanrei G, Pierer K, Stawiarz K, Kunz R, Mol BW, Khan KS. 2007. A clinically integrated curriculum in evidence‐based medicine for just‐in‐time learning through on‐the‐job training: The EU‐EBM project. BMC Med Educ 7: 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaly FJ. 2010. Use of electronic anatomy practical examinations for remediating “at risk” students. Anat Sci Educ 3: 46 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonner RS, Bickley H. 1993. Problem‐based learning in American medical‐education: An overview. Bull Med Libr Assoc 81: 294 – 298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake RL. 1998. Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum. Anat Rec 253: 28 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake RL, Lowrie DJ Jr., Prewitt CM. 2002. Survey of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryology courses in medical school curricula in the United States. Anat Rec 269: 118 – 122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2009. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2: 253 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. 2014. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 7: 321 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurning SJ, Cleary TJ, Sandars J, Hemmer P, Kokotailo P, Artino AR. 2011. Perspective: Viewing "strugglers" through a different lens: How a self‐regulated learning perspective can help medical educators with assessment and remediation. Acad Med 86: 488 – 495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForester JP, McWhorter DL, Cole MA. 2002. The relationship between premedical coursework in gross anatomy and histology and medical school performance in gross anatomy and histology. Clin Anat 15: 160 – 164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C. 2007. Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12: 491 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauer KE, Ciccone A, Henzel TR, Katsufrakis P, Miller SH, Norcross WA, Papadakis MA, Irby DM. 2009. Remediation of the deficiencies of physicians across the continuum from medical school to practice: A thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 84: 1822 – 1832.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelle L, Nivala M, Kronqvist P, Ericsson KA, Lehtinen E. 2010. Do prior knowledge, personality and visual perceptual ability predict student performance in microscopic pathology? Med Educ 44: 621 – 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeylings DJ. 2002. Anatomy 1999–2000: The curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ 36: 702 – 710.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoladay L, Selvig D, Purkiss J, Hortsch M. 2013. Preference of interactive electronic versus traditional histology learning resources by University of Michigan medical students during the first year histology component. Med Sci Educ 23: 607 – 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuff KL, Fang D. 1999. When are students most at risk of encountering academic difficulty? A study of the 1992 matriculants to U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 74: 453 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones RF, Thomae‐Forgues M. 1984. Validity of the MCAT in predicting performance in the first two years of medical school. J Med Educ 59: 455 – 464.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlement BJ, Paulsen DF, Wineski LE. 2011. Anatomy as the backbone of an integrated first year medical curriculum: Design and implementation. Anat Sci Educ 4: 157 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoenig JA. 1992. Comparison of medical school performances and career plans of students with broad and with science‐focused premedical preparation. Acad Med 67: 191 – 196.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ase1519.pdf
Size:
182.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.