Show simple item record

The Heritage of the Future: Historical Keyboards, Technology, and Modernism

dc.contributor.authorNg, Tiffany
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-29T17:00:04Z
dc.date.available2015-10-29T17:00:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/115492
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines modernist twentieth-century applications of the pipe organ and the carillon in the United States and in the Netherlands. These keyboard instruments, historically owned by religious or governmental entities, served an exceptionally diverse variety of political, technological, social, and urban planning functions. Their powerful simultaneous associations with historicism and innovation enabled those who built and played them to anchor the instruments’ novel uses in the perceived authority of tradition, church, and state. This usage became particularly evident after World War II, when Philips Electronics and the engineers and musicians whose careers were shaped by the military-industrial complex and the Cold War used the organ and carillon to present alternative visions and performances of their research, knowledge, and services. ** The organ served as a vehicle for innovation for early electronic music and sound synthesis pioneers in three ways. First, it provided a model for an efficient user interface for new synthesizer technologies that found both musical and military communications applications. Second, the pipe organ became the first instrument to be electronically simulated on a commercially viable basis. As a result, the first federal legal proceedings to define the successful simulation of musical sound centered on the electronic organ. Electronic organs also helped shape a historicist “neo-baroque” movement that was, in part, both a reaction to and an outgrowth of their commercial success. Third, inventors in the field of electronics, particularly military electronics, turned to organ building to satisfy a desire to connect with historicist ideas about craft and tradition. They became leaders of the Organ Reform Movement after World War II, dedicated to reviving aspects of Baroque organ building. I build on Richard Taruskin’s critique of “historically informed performance” as itself a form of modernism in order to elucidate previously overlooked relationships between Reform organ building, organ recording artists, the military-industrial complex, and cold war politics. ** The carillon served as a vehicle for international exchange after World War II, facilitating the sharing of soundscape and landscape design ideas between America and the Netherlands. In the 1950s, the people of the Netherlands donated a carillon to the United States as a sounding symbol of political harmony between the two allies. However, the resulting political squabbles and the disharmony and decay of its bells tolled the ineffectiveness of this instrument of diplomacy. In the following decade, Philips Electronics took inspiration from suburban American corporate research parks to construct a techno-cultural complex in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. This International Style park used the Dutch carillon’s sonic and visual symbolism to re-center the perceived core of Eindhoven and of civic authority onto Philips’ campus. ** An important part of the broader history of postwar expansion and the military-industrial complex are the science-fiction, mystery, and filmic spinoffs and sonic imaginaries associated with these reinvented carillons and organs, and the way such narratives cross the boundaries between high art and popular culture. The institutions and donors that built carillons often justified them with utopian rhetoric about creating community, public music, and elevating general musical taste. However, a vein of dystopian fiction about bells in literature, opera, film, and television counterbalanced that discourse. The realm of fiction ties together this dissertation’s overarching themes of historical revival, technological innovation, modernism, and military electronics research.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRonald Barnes Memorial Scholarshipen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipE. Power Biggs Fellowshipen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWestfield Center for Historical Keyboard Studiesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipConsortium for Faculty Diversityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of California, Berkeley (Department of Music, Graduate Division, and Berkeley Center for New Media)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcarillonen_US
dc.subjectpipe organen_US
dc.subjectorganen_US
dc.subjectmusicologyen_US
dc.subjectnew mediaen_US
dc.subjectbellsen_US
dc.subjectcold waren_US
dc.subjectAmerican historyen_US
dc.subjectDutch studiesen_US
dc.subjectNetherlandsen_US
dc.subjectArlingtonen_US
dc.subjectVirgil Foxen_US
dc.subjectE. Power Biggsen_US
dc.subjectelectronic musicen_US
dc.subjectelectric keyboardsen_US
dc.subjectkeyboard instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectEindhovenen_US
dc.subjectPhilipsen_US
dc.subjectgraphic notationen_US
dc.titleThe Heritage of the Future: Historical Keyboards, Technology, and Modernismen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMusic and Dance
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTheatre and Drama
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArts
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Music, Theatre & Danceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Organen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115492/1/TKN_dissertation.pdf
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5123-1808en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of TKN_dissertation.pdf : Dissertation
dc.identifier.name-orcidNg, Tiffany; 0000-0002-5123-1808en_US
dc.owningcollnameMusic, Theatre & Dance, School of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.