View Item 

Show simple item record

Parametric inference for multiple repairable systems under dependent competing risks

dc.contributor.authorSomboonsavatdee, Anupapen_US
dc.contributor.authorSen, Anandaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-12T21:03:35Z
dc.date.available2016-11-01T16:43:14Zen
dc.date.issued2015-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationSomboonsavatdee, Anupap; Sen, Ananda (2015). "Parametric inference for multiple repairable systems under dependent competing risks." Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 31(5): 706-720.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-1904en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-4025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/115899
dc.publisherChapman & Hall/CRCen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherpower law processen_US
dc.subject.otherrecurrent eventen_US
dc.subject.otherseries systemen_US
dc.subject.othershared frailtyen_US
dc.subject.otherdependent failure modesen_US
dc.titleParametric inference for multiple repairable systems under dependent competing risksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115899/1/asmb2079.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/asmb.2079en_US
dc.identifier.sourceApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawless JF, Nadeau C. Some simple robust methods for the analysis of recurrent events. Technometrics 1995; 37: 158 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangseth H, Lindqvist BH. Competing risks for repairable systems: a data study. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2006; 136: 1687 – 1700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawless JF, Wigg MB, Tuli S, Drake J, Lamberti‐Pasculli M. Analysis of repeated failures or durations, with application to shunt failures for patients with paediatric hydrocephalus. Applied Statistics 2001; 50: 449 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDauxois J‐Y, Sencey S. Non‐parametric tests for recurrent events under competing risks. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2009; 36: 649 – 670.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBain LJ 1978; Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life‐Testing Models: Theory and Methods (2nd edn), Marcel Dekker: New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRigdon SE, Basu AP. Statistical Methods for the Reliability of Repairable Systems. Wiley: New York, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrow LH. Reliability analysis for complex, repairable systems. In Reliability and Biometry, Proschan F, Serfling RJ (eds). SIAM: Philadelphia, 1974; 379 – 410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSomboonsavatdee A, Sen A. Statistical inference for power law process with competing risks. Technometrics 2014. http://amstat.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/00401706.2014.902772.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElandt‐Johnson R. Conditional failure time distributions under competing risk theory with dependent failure times and proportional hazard rates. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 1976; 59: 37 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor L, Peña EA. Parametric estimation in a recurrent competing risks model. Journal of Iranian Statistical Society 2013; 12: 153 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeña EA, Strawderman RL, Hollander M. Nonparametric estimation with recurrent event data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96: 1299 – 1315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuane JT. Learning curve approach to reliability monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace 1964; 2: 563 – 566.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demographics 1979; 16: 439 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHougaard P. Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data. Springer: New York, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElbers C, Ridder G. True and spurious duration dependence: the identifiability of the proportional hazard model. The Review of Economic Studies 1982; 49: 403 – 409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh D, Lin DY. Nonparametric analysis of recurrent events and death. Biometrics 2000; 56: 554 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin DY, Wei LJ, Yang I, Ying Z. Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 2000; 62: 771 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEfron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science 1986; 1: 54 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCrink LM, Marshal AH, Cairns KJ. Advances in joint modelling: A review of recent developments with application to the survival of end stage renal disease patients. International Statistical Review 2013; 81: 249 – 269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePievatolo A, Ruggeri F. Bayesian reliability analysis of complex repairable systems. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2004; 20: 253 – 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHong Y, Li M, Osborn B. System unavailability analysis based on window‐observed recurrent event data. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2013. DOI: 10.1002/asmb.1984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorfine M, Hsu L. Frailty‐based competing risks model for multivariate survival data. Biometrics 2011; 67: 415 – 426.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrowder M. Classical Competing Risks. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePintilie M. Competing Risks: A Practical Perspective (Statistics in Practice). John Wiley & Sons Ltd: West Sussex, England, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMajumdar SK. An optimum maintenance strategy for a vertical boring machine system. Operational Research Society of India 1993; 30: 344 – 365.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
asmb2079.pdf
Size:
2.362MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.