View Item 

Show simple item record

Competition and subsidies in the deregulated US local telephone industry

dc.contributor.authorFan, Yingen_US
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Moen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-12T21:03:39Z
dc.date.available2016-12-01T14:33:05Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationFan, Ying; Xiao, Mo (2015). "Competition and subsidies in the deregulated US local telephone industry." The RAND Journal of Economics 46(4): 751-776.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0741-6261en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-2171en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/115904
dc.publisherBrookings Institution Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleCompetition and subsidies in the deregulated US local telephone industryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115904/1/rand12109.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/115904/2/rand12109-sup-0001-SupMat.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1756-2171.12109en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe RAND Journal of Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiravete, E. “ Estimating Demand for Local Telephone Service with Asymmetric Information and Optional Calling Plans.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 69 ( 2002 ), pp. 943 – 971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKellogg, R. “ The Effect of Uncertainty on Investment: Evidence from Texas Oil Drilling.” American Economic Review, Vol. 104 ( 2014 ), pp. 1698 – 1734.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennedy, C.H. An Introduction to U.S. Telecommunications Law. 2d ed. Nerwood, MA: Artech House Telecommunications Library, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsa, D. “ Competition and Product Quality in the Supermarket Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 126 ( 2011 ), pp. 1539 – 1591.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazzeo, M.J. “ Competition and Service Quality in the US Airline Industry.” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 22 ( 2003 ), pp. 275 – 296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMini, F. “ The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants.” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 49 ( 2001 ), pp. 379 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNardotto, M., Valletti, T., and Verboven, F. “ Unbundling the Incumbent: Evidence from UK Broadband.” CEPR Discussion Papers no. 9194, CEPR Discussion Papers, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevo, A. “ Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready‐to‐Eat Cereal Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31 ( 2000 ), pp. 395 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew Paradigm Resources Group. 1999–2003, 1998–2002 CLEC Reports, Chicago, IL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePakes, A., Ostrovsky, M., and Berry, S. “ Simple Estimators for the Parameters of Discrete Dynamic Games, with Entry/Exit Examples.” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 38 ( 2007 ), pp. 373 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePesendorfer, M. and Schmidt‐Dengler, P. “ Asymptotic Least Squares Estimators for Dynamic Games.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 75 ( 2008 ), pp. 901 – 928.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePindyck, R. “ Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment.” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29 ( 1991 ), pp. 1110 – 1148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePindyck, R. “ Sunk Costs and Real Options in Antitrust.” In W. Collins, ed., Issues in Competition Law and Policy. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan, S. “ The Costs of Environmental Regulation in a Concentrated Industry.” Econometrica, Vol. 80 ( 2012 ), pp. 1019 – 1061.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXiao, M. and Orazem, P. “ Does the Fourth Entrant Make Any Difference? Entry and Competition in the Early U.S. Broadband Market.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 29 ( 2011 ), pp. 547 – 561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung, S., Dreazen, Y., and Blumenstein, R. “ On Hold: Local Phone Giants Beat Back Rivals, as Competition Stalls.” Wall Street Journal, February 11, 2002, pp. 547 – 561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerberg, D.A., Riordan, M.H., Rosston, G.L., and Wimmer, B.S. “ Low‐Income Demand for Local Telephone Service: Effects of Lifeline and Linkup.” No 08‐047, Discussion Papers, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAguirregabiria, V. and Mira, P. “ Sequential Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Games.” Econometrica, Vol. 75 ( 2007 ), pp. 1 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander, D.L. and Feinberg, R.M. “ Entry in Local Telecommunications Markets.” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25 ( 2004 ), pp. 107 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajari, P., Benkard, L., and Levin, J. “ Estimating Dynamic Models of Imperfect Competition.” Econometrica, Vol. 75 ( 2007 ), pp. 1331 – 1370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasker, E. “ Selling a Cheaper Mousetrap: Wal‐Mart's Effect on Retail Prices.” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 58 ( 2005 ), pp. 203 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBresnahan, T.F. and Reiss, P.C. “ Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99 ( 1991 ), pp. 977 – 1009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollard‐Wexler, A. “ Demand Fluctuations in the Ready‐Mix Concrete Industry.” Econometrica, Vol. 81 ( 2013 ), pp. 1003 – 1037.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrandall, R.W. “ An Assessment of the Competitive Local Exchange Carriers Five Years After the Passage of the Telecommunications Act.” Unpublished Report, June 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrandall, R.W.. “ Competition and Chaos: US Telecommunications since the 1996 Telecom Act.” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoraszelski, U. and Satterthwaite, M. “ Computable Markov–Perfect Industry Dynamics.” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 41 ( 2010 ), pp. 215 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunne, T., Klimek, S., Roberts, M., and Xu, D.Y. “ Entry, Exit and the Determinants of Market Structure.” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 44 ( 2013 ), pp. 462 – 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEconomides, N. “ The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Its Impact.” Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 11 ( 1999 ), pp. 455 – 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEconomides, N., Seim, K., and Viard, V.B. “ Quantifying the Benefits of Entry into Local Telephone Service.” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 39 ( 2008 ), pp. 699 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFan, Y. “ Estimating the Costs of Market Entry and Exit for Video Rental Stores.” Working Paper, University of Michigan, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFan, Y. “ Ownership Consolidation and Product Characteristics: A Study of the US Daily Newspaper Market.” American Economic Review, Vol. 103 ( 2013 ), pp. 1598 – 1628.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldfarb, A. and Xiao, M. “ Who Thinks About the Competition? Managerial Ability and Strategic Entry in US Local Telephone Markets.” American Economic Review, Vol. 101 ( 2011 ), pp. 3130 – 3161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenstein, S. and Mazzeo, M.J. “ The Role of Differentiation Strategy in Local Telecommunication Entry and Market Evolution: 1999–2002.” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 54 ( 2006 ), pp. 323 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHausman, J.A. and Taylor, W.E. “ Telecommunications Deregulation.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 102 ( 2012 ), pp. 382 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman, J.J. and Honoré, B.E. “ The Empirical Content of the Roy Model.” Econometrica, Vol. 58 ( 1990 ), pp. 1121 – 1149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHotz, V.J. and Miller, R.A. “ Conditional Choice Probabilities and the Estimation of Dynamic Models.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60 ( 1993 ), pp. 497 – 529.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
rand12109.pdf
Size:
296.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
rand12109-sup-0001-SupMat.pdf
Size:
293.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.