View Item 

Show simple item record

Patients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Death
dc.contributor.authorAmendola, Laura M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHorike‐pyne, Marthaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrinidad, Susan B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFullerton, Stephanie M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Barbara J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Wylieen_US
dc.contributor.authorJarvik, Gail P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-12T21:04:49Z
dc.date.available2016-11-01T16:43:14Zen
dc.date.issued2015-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmendola, Laura M.; Horike‐pyne, Martha ; Trinidad, Susan B.; Fullerton, Stephanie M.; Evans, Barbara J.; Burke, Wylie; Jarvik, Gail P. (2015). "Patients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Death." The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43(3): 476-485.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1073-1105en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-720Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116009
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titlePatients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Deathen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116009/1/jlme12290.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jlme.12290en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference45 C.F.R. § 164.522; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Health Information of Deceased Individuals (2013), available at < http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/decedents.html > (last visited August 1, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Batte et al., “ Family Communication in a Population at Risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy,” Journal of Genetic Counseling 24, no. 2 ( 2014 ): 336 – 348; J. Green et al., “Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer,” Journal of Genetic Counseling 6, no. 1 (1997): 45–60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. E. Palmquist et al., “ ‘The Cancer Bond’: Exploring the Formation of Cancer Risk Perception in Families with Lynch Syndrome,” Journal of Genetic Counseling 19, no. 5 ( 2010 ): 473 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules, 78 Federal Register 5566–5702 (2013).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference45 C.F.R. § 160.103 (2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference45 C.F.R. § 164.502(g)(4) (2014); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, supra note 12, at 5614–15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, supra note 13, at 5616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceId., at 5614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceId., at 5615; see also 45 C.F.R. § 164.510(b)(5) (Providing, “Uses and disclosures when the individual is deceased. If the individual is deceased, a covered entity may disclose to a family member, or other persons identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section who were involved in the individual's care or payment for health care prior to the individual's death, protected health information of the individual that is relevant to such person's involvement, unless doing so is inconsistent with any prior expressed preference of the individual that is known to the covered entity.”).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. T. Brunner, “ What constitutes power coupled with interest within the rule as to termination of agency,” 28 A.L.R.2d 1243, §§ 1, 11 ( 1953, updated to 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, supra note 12, at 5616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, supra note 13, at 5615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBombard et al., supra note 6; Offit et al., supra note 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, How Can Family Members of a Deceased Individual Obtain the Deceased Individual's Protected Health Information that is Relevant to their Own Care? (2013), available at < http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/faq/personal_representatives_and_minors/222.html > (August 1, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, May a Health Care Provider Disclose Protected Health Information About an Individual to Another Provider, When Such Information Is Requested for the Treatment of a Family Member of the Individual? (2009), available at < http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/faq/disclosures_to_friends_and_family/512.html > (last visited August 1, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Galvin and M. L. Clayman, “ Disclosure/Disruption: Considering Why Not to Disclose Genetic Information after Death,” AJOB 12, no. 10 ( 2012 ): 14 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference45 C.F.R. § 164.522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health & Human Services, supra note 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBredenoord and van Delden, supra note 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Chan et al., “ Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results from Whole‐Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives,” AJOB 12, no. 10 ( 2012 ): 1 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. M. Wolf, “ Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings: Facing the Challenges of Translational Science,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 14 ( 2013 ): 557 – 577; R. C. Green et al., “ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing,” Genetics in Medicine 15, no. 7 (2013): 565–574; American College of Medical Genetics, ACMG Updates Recommendation on “Opt Out” for Genome Sequencing Return of Results (2014), available at < https://www.acmg.net/docs/Release_ACMGUpdatesRecommendations_final.pdf > (last visited January 15, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan, supra note 1; S. M. Fullerton et al., “Beneficence, Clinical Urgency, and the Return of Individual Research Results to relatives,” AJOB 12, no. 10 (2012): 9–10; A. L. Bredenoord and J. J. van Delden, “Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy,” AJOB 12, no. 10 (2012): 10–12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan, supra note 1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFullerton, supra note 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Bombard et al., “ Risks to Relatives in Genomic Research: A Duty to Warn? ” AJOB 12, no. 10 ( 2012 ): 12 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Offit et al., “ The ‘Duty to Warn’ a Patient's Family Members about Hereditary Disease Risks,” JAMA 292, no. 12 ( 2004 ): 1469 – 1473.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. E. Forest et al., “ Communicating Genetic Information in Families – A Review of Guidelines and Position Papers,” European Journal of Human Genetics 15, no. 6 ( 2007 ): 612 – 618.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCSER: Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research, available at < https://cser-consortium.org/ > (last visited April 2, 2015); National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER), available at < http://www.genome.gov/27546194 > (last visited August 1, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Dodd‐McCue et al., “ The Role of Women in the Donation Consent Decision: Building on Previous Research,” Progress in Transplantation 17, no. 3 ( 2007 ): 209 – 214.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jlme12290.pdf
Size:
1.633MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.