Is the Roberts Court Especially Activist? A Study of Invalidating (and Upholding) Federal, State, and Local Laws
dc.contributor.author | Epstein, Lee | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Andrew D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-04T14:54:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-04T14:54:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lee Epstein and Andrew D. Martin. 2012. “Is the Roberts Court Especially Activist? A Study of Invalidating (and Upholding) Federal, State, and Local Laws.” Emory Law Journal. 61: 737-758. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116096 | |
dc.description.abstract | Is the Roberts Court especially activist or, depending on your preference, especially lacking in judicial self-restraint? If we define judicial self-restraint as a reluctance to declare legislative action unconstitutional and confine the analysis to the 1969–2009 Terms,2 the answer is no. The Roberts Justices, just as their immediate predecessors, are neither uniform activists nor committed restraintists. Rather, the Justices’ votes to strike (and uphold) statutes seem to reflect their political preferences toward the policy content of the law, and not an underlying preference for restraint (or activism). In a nutshell, liberal Justices tend to invalidate conservative laws and conservative Justices, liberal laws. This holds regardless of whether we examine all the Justices’ votes simultaneously or each Justice individually. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Is the Roberts Court Especially Activist? A Study of Invalidating (and Upholding) Federal, State, and Local Laws | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | LSA Dean's Office | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Southern California | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116096/1/emory12.pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | Emory Law Journal | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-6532-0721 | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Martin, Andrew; 0000-0002-6532-0721 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Political Science |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.