Show simple item record

Food preference of invertebrates at different stages of forest succession.

dc.contributor.authorLandgraf, Ava
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Burn Plotsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T16:32:52Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T16:32:52Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116797
dc.descriptionGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.description.abstractHumans depend on the resources and services from forest ecosystems. Due to human overconsumption of resources, our forests are diminishing. We must develop a better understanding of forests in order to use forest resources more efficiently. In order to better understand forest ecosystems we investigated whether a forest's stage of succession affects the food preference within each forest. To test this we arranged several sites of rice, coated in different substances, in forests at different stages of succession. We found a signficant difference in amount of food consumed in each plot, but not a signficant difference in type of food consumed in each plot. The 1954 burn plot had significantly less consumption than the other plots. Overall the consumption of rice decreased as forest age increased. With a better understanding of forest succession, we can preserve Michigan forests.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subject.classificationAspenen_US
dc.subject.classificationPine Woodlandsen_US
dc.titleFood preference of invertebrates at different stages of forest succession.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116797/1/Landgraf_Ava_2015.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.