Show simple item record

Patient responses to research recruitment and follow-up surveys: findings from a diverse multicultural health care setting in Qatar

dc.contributor.authorKhidir, Amal
dc.contributor.authorAsad, Humna
dc.contributor.authorAbdelrahim, Huda
dc.contributor.authorElnashar, Maha
dc.contributor.authorKillawi, Amal
dc.contributor.authorHammoud, Maya
dc.contributor.authorAl-Khal, Abdul L
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Pascale
dc.contributor.authorFetters, Michael D
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-27T19:02:13Z
dc.date.available2016-01-27T19:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-26
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology. 2016 Jan 26;16(1):10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116869en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Health care researchers working in the Arabian Gulf need information on how to optimize recruitment and retention of study participants in extremely culturally diverse settings. Implemented in Doha, Qatar in 2012 with 4 language groups, namely Arabic, English, Hindi, and Urdu, this research documents persons’ responses to recruitment, consent, follow-up, and reminder procedures during psychometric testing of the Multicultural Assessment Instrument (MAI), a novel self- or interviewer-administered survey. Methods Bilingual research assistants recruited adults in outpatient clinics by approaching persons in particular who appeared to be from a target language group. Participants completed the MAI, a second acculturation instrument used for content-validity assessment, and a demographics questionnaire. Participants were asked to take the MAI again in 2–3 weeks, in person or by post, to assess test-retest reliability. Recruitment data were analyzed by using nonparametric statistics. Results Of 1503 persons approached during recruitment, 400 enrolled (27 %)—100 per language group. The enrollment rates in the language groups were: Arabic-32 %; English-33 %; Hindi-18 %; Urdu-30 %. The groups varied somewhat in their preferences regarding consent procedure, follow-up survey administration, contact mode for follow-up reminders, and disclosure of personal mailing address (for postal follow-up). Over all, telephone was the preferred medium for follow-up reminders. Of 64 persons who accepted a research assistant’s invitation for in-person follow-up, 40 participants completed the interview (follow-up rate, 63 %); among 126 persons in the postal group with a deliverable address, 29 participants mailed back a completed follow-up survey (response rate, 23 %). Conclusions Researchers in the Arabian Gulf face challenges to successfully identify, enroll, and retain eligible study participants. Although bilingual assistants—often from the persons’ own culture—recruited face-to-face, and our questionnaire contained no health care-related content, many persons were reluctant to participate. This occurrence was observed especially at follow-up, particularly among participants who had agreed to follow-up by post.
dc.titlePatient responses to research recruitment and follow-up surveys: findings from a diverse multicultural health care setting in Qatar
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116869/1/12874_2016_Article_109.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-016-0109-3en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderKhidir et al.
dc.date.updated2016-01-27T19:02:16Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.