View Item 

Show simple item record

Tree range expansion may be enhanced by escape from negative plant–soil feedbacks
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy-Neumann, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez, Inésen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:47:34Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:47:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthy-Neumann, Sarah; Ibáñez, Inés (2012). "Tree range expansion may be enhanced by escape from negative plantâ soil feedbacks." Ecology 93(12): 2637-2649.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116926
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subject.otherPrunus serotinaen_US
dc.subject.otherQuercus velutinaen_US
dc.subject.otherRobinia pseudoacaciaen_US
dc.subject.otherQuercus rubraen_US
dc.subject.otherAcer rubrumen_US
dc.subject.otherAcer saccharumen_US
dc.subject.otherCarya glabraen_US
dc.subject.otherhierarchical Bayesen_US
dc.subject.otherlight availabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherLiriodendron tulipiferaen_US
dc.subject.otherLower Peninsula, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.subject.otherclimate changeen_US
dc.titleTree range expansion may be enhanced by escape from negative plant–soil feedbacksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116926/1/ecy201293122637.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/11-2281.1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCarthy-Neumann, S., and R. K. Kobe. 2010 b. Conspecific and heterospecific plant—soil feedbacks influence survivorship and growth of temperate tree seedlings. Journal of Ecology 98: 408 – 418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I., J. S. Clark, M. C. Dietze, K. Feeley, M. Hersh, S. LaDeau, A. McBride, N. E. Welch, and M. S. Wolosin. 2006. Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species—area curve. Ecology 87: 1896 – 1906.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInderjit, and W. H. van der Putten. 2010. Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 512 – 519.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuice, S. M., T. J. Fahey, T. G. Siccama, C. T. Driscoll, E. G. Denny, C. Eagar, N. L. Cleavitt, R. Minocha, and A. D. Richardson. 2006. Response of sugar maple to calcium addition to northern hardwood forest. Ecology 87: 1267 – 1280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKardol, P., N. J. Cornips, M. M. L. van Kempen, J. M. T. Bakx-Schotman, and W. H. van der Putten. 2007. Microbe-mediated plant—soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecological Monographs 77: 147 – 162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlironomos, J. N. 2002. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417: 67 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobe, R. K. 1999. Light gradient partitioning among tropical tree species through differential seedling mortality and growth. Ecology 80: 187 – 201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobe, R. K., S. W. Pacala, and Silander, J. A. Jr. 1995. Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecological Applications 5: 517 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonno, M., S. Iwamoto, and K. Seiwa. 2011. Specialization of a fungal pathogen on host tree species in a cross-inoculation experiment. Journal of Ecology 99: 1394 – 1401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulmatiski, A., J. Heavilin, and K. H. Beard. 2011. Testing predictions of a three-species plant—soil feedback model. Journal of Ecology 99: 542 – 550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, E. L., Jr. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Volume 1, conifers and important hardwoods. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 1146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMangan, S. A., S. A. Schnitzer, E. A. Herre, K. Mack, M. Valencia, E. Sanchez, and J. D. Bever. 2010. Negative plant—soil feedback predicts tree-species relative species abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466: 752 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCarthy-Neumann, S., and R. K. Kobe. 2010 a. Conspecific plant—soil feedbacks reduce survivorship and growth of tropical tree seedlings. Journal of Ecology 98: 396 – 407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Hanlon-Manners, D. L., and P. M. Kotanen. 2004. Evidence that fungal pathogens inhibit recruitment of a shade-intolerant tree, white birch ( Betula papyrifera ), in understory habitats. Oecologia 140: 650 – 653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParmesan, C., et al. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579 – 583.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowlsen, D. S., and D. S. Jenkinson. 1976. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—II. Gamma irradiation, air-drying and fumigation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 8: 179 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad, A. M., L. R. Iverson, S. Matthews, and M. Peters. 2007. A climate change atlas for 134 forest tree species of the eastern United States. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware, Ohio, USA. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/treeen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinhart, K. O., and R. M. Callaway. 2006. Tansley review. Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytologist 170: 445 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinhart, K. O., A. Packer, W. H. Van der Putten, and K. Clay. 2003. Plant–soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters 6: 1046 – 1050.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinhart, K. O., A. A. Royo, W. H. Van der Putten, and K. Clay. 2005. Soil feedback and pathogen activity associated with Prunus serotina throughout its native range. Journal of Ecology 93: 890 – 898.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRillig, M., S. Wright, and V. T. Eviner. 2002. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregration: comparing effects of five plant species. Plant and Soil 238: 325 – 333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnitzer, S. A., J. N. Klironomos, J. HilleRisLambers, L. L. Kinkel, P. B. Reich, K. Xiao, M. C. Rillig, B. A. Sikes, R. A. Callaway, S. A. Mangan, E. H. van Nes, and M. Scheffer. 2011. Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity–productivity pattern. Ecology 92: 296 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiccama, T. G., T. J. Fahey, C. E. Johnson, T. W. Sherry, E. G. Denny, E. B. Girdler, G. E. Likens, and P. A. Schwarz. 2007. Population and biomass dynamics of trees in a northern hardwood forest at Hubbard Brook. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 737 – 749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiegelhalter, D. J., N. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. V. D. Linde. 2000. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 64: 583 – 639.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStinson, K. A., S. A. Campbell, J. R. Powell, B. E. Wolfe, R. M. Callaway, G. C. Thelen, S. G. Hallett, D. Prati, and J. N. Klironomos. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biology 4 (5): e140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSykorova, Z., K. Ineichen, A. Wiemken, and D. Redecker. 2007. The cultivation bias: different communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in roots from the field, from bait plants transplanted to the field, and from a greenhouse trap experiment. Mycorrhiza 18: 1 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, A., B. O'Hara, U. Ligges, and S. Sturtz. 2006. Making BUGS open. RNews 6: 12 – 17. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Grunsven, R. H. A., W. H. van der Putten, T. M. Bezemer, F. Berendse, and E. M. Veenendaal. 2010. Plant–soil interactions in the expansion and native range of a poleward shifting plant species. Global Change Biology 16: 380 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, K. V., M. B. Davis, and S. Sugita. 2002. Climate change and shifts in potential tree species range limits in the Great Lakes region. Journal of Great Lakes Research 28: 555 – 567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrios, G. N. 1997. Plant pathology. Fourth edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, P. K., O. Borgan, R. D. Gill, and N. Keiding. 1993. Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, P. K., and R. D. Gill. 1982. Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Annals of Statistics 10: 1100 – 1120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAugspurger, C. K. 1990. Spatial patterns of damping-off disease during seedling recruitment in tropical forests. Pages 131 – 144 in J. Burdon and S. Leather, editors. Pests, pathogens, and plant communities. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAugspurger, C. K., and C. K. Kelly. 1984. Pathogen mortality of tropical seedlings: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distances, seedling density, and light conditions. Oecologia 61: 211 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes, B. V., and W. H. Wagner. 2004. Michigan trees. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBever, J. D. 1994. Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75: 1965 – 1977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBever, J. D., I. A. Dickie, E. Facelli, J. M. Facelli, J. N. Klironomos, M. Moora, M. C. Rillig, W. D. Stock, M. Tibbett, and M. Zobel. 2010. Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 468 – 478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBever, J. D., K. Westover, and J. Antonovics. 1997. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. Journal of Ecology 85: 561 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBezemer, T. M., C. S. Lawson, K. Hedlund, A. R. Edwards, A. J. Brooks, J. M. Igual, S. R. Mortimer, and W. H. van der Putten. 2006. Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant–soil feedback responses in two grasslands. Journal of Ecology 94: 893 – 904.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala. 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2, Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaway, R. M., E. J. Bedmar, K. Reinhart, C. G. Silvan, and J. N. Klironomos. 2011. Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology 92: 1027 – 1035.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanham, C. D., R. K. Kobe, E. F. Latty, and R. L. Chazdon. 1999. Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedlings survival: effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrates reserves. Oecologia 121: 1 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, J. S. 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8: 2 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleavitt, N. L., T. J. Fahey, and J. J. Battles. 2011. Regeneration ecology of sugar maple ( Acer saccharum ): seedling survival in relation to nutrition, site factors, and damage by insects and pathogens. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 235 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrenfeld, J. G., B. Ravit, and K. Elgersma. 2005. Feedbacks in the plant—soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 75 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelkes, T., E. Morrie, K. J. F. Verhoeven, T. M. Bezemer, A. Biere, J. A. Harvey, L. M. McIntyre, W. L. M. Tamis, and W. H. van der Putten. 2008. Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456: 946 – 948.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinzi, A. C., C. D. Canham, and N. Van Breemen. 1998 a. Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecological Applications 8: 447 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinzi, A. C., N. Van Breemen, and C. D. Canham. 1998 b. Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8: 440 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming, T., and D. Harrington. 1991. Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurevitch, J., S. M. Scheiner, and G. A. Fox. 2002. The ecology of plants. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I., J. S. Clark, and M. Dietze. 2008. Evaluating the sources of potential migrant species: implications under climate change. Ecological Applications 18: 1664 – 1678.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I., J. S. Clark, and M. Dietze. 2009. Estimating performance of potential migrant species. Global Change Biology 15: 1173 – 1188.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy201293122637.pdf
Size:
798KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.