View Item 

Show simple item record

Mechanisms Of Nonlethal Predator Effect On Cohort Size Variation: Ecological And Evolutionary Implications
dc.contributor.authorPeacor, Scott D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchiesari, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Earl E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:47:42Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2007-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeacor, Scott D.; Schiesari, Luis; Werner, Earl E. (2007). "Mechanisms Of Nonlethal Predator Effect On Cohort Size Variation: Ecological And Evolutionary Implications." Ecology 88(6): 1536-1547.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116938
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subject.othersize variationen_US
dc.subject.otheranuranen_US
dc.subject.othercohorten_US
dc.subject.othergrowth autocorrelationen_US
dc.subject.othergrowth rateen_US
dc.subject.otherheritabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherinductionen_US
dc.subject.othernonconsumptive effecten_US
dc.subject.othernonlethal effecten_US
dc.subject.otherphenotypic plasticityen_US
dc.subject.otherpredatoren_US
dc.subject.otherselectionen_US
dc.titleMechanisms Of Nonlethal Predator Effect On Cohort Size Variation: Ecological And Evolutionary Implicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental Management, School of Arts, Sciences, and Humanities, University of São Paulo, Av. Arlindo Bétio 1000, São Paulo 03828-080 Brazilen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 2205 Commonwealth Boulevard, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116938/1/ecy20078861536.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/06-1066en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicker, W. E. 1958. Handbook of computations for biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin Number 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima, S. L. 1998. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior 27: 215 – 290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLomnicki, A. 1988. Population ecology of individuals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLudsin, S. A., and D. R. Devries. 1997. First-year recruitment of largemouth bass: the interdependency of early life stages. Ecological Applications 7: 1024 – 1038.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPeek, M. A., M. Grace, and J. M. L. Richardson. 2001. Physiological and behavioral responses to predators shape the growth/predation risk trade-off in damselflies. Ecology 82: 1535 – 1545.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. D. 2002. Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour. Ecology Letters 5: 77 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. D., J. R. Bence, and C. A. Pfister. 2007. The effect of size-dependent growth and environmental factors on animal size variability. Theoretical Population Biology 71: 80 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. D., and C. A. Pfister. 2006. Individual size variation in wood frog ( Rana sylvatica ) tadpoles: the effect of competition and model analysis of size-dependent and size-independent factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 990 – 999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 2000. Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. Ecology 81: 1998 – 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 2004. Context dependence of nonlethal effects of a predator on prey growth. Israel Journal of Zoology 50: 139 – 167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfister, C. A., and S. D. Peacor. 2003. Variable performance of individuals: the role of population density and endogenously formed landscape heterogeneity. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 725 – 735.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfister, C. A., and F. R. Stevens. 2002. The genesis of size variability in plants and animals. Ecology 83: 59 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfister, C. A., and F. R. Stevens. 2003. Individual variation and environmental stochasticity: implications for matrix model predictions. Ecology 84: 496 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea, R. A., and J. R. Auld. 2005. Predator- and competitor-induced plasticity: how changes in foraging morphology affect phenotypic trade-offs. Ecology 86: 1723 – 1729.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea, R. A., and E. E. Werner. 1999. Quantifying the relation between predator-induced behavior and growth performance in larval anurans. Ecology 80: 2117 – 2124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoughgarden, J. 1974. Niche width: biogeographic patterns among Anolis lizard populations. American Naturalist 108: 429 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanford, E., M. S. Roth, G. C. Johns, J. P. Wares, and G. N. Somero. 2003. Local selection and latitudinal variation in a marine predator–prey interaction. Science 300: 1135 – 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSebens, K. P. 1987. The ecology of indeterminate growth in animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 371 – 407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih, A., A. Bell, and J. C. Johnson. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 372 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTollrain, R., and C. D. Harvell. 1999. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUchmański, J. 1985. Differentiation and frequency-distributions of body weights in plants and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 310: 1 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUchmański, J. 1999. What promotes persistence of a single population: an individual-based model. Ecological Modelling 115: 227 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUchmański, J., and V. Grimm. 1996. Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 437 – 441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Valen, L. 1965. Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. American Naturalist 99: 377 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E. 1992. Competitive interactions between wood frog and northern leopard frog larvae: the influence of size and activity. Copeia 1992: 26 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E., and J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 393 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84: 1083 – 1100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitlock, M. C. 1995. Variance-induced peak shifts. Evolution 49: 252 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilbur, H. M., and J. P. Collins. 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182: 1305 – 1314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, D. S. 1998. Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353: 199 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiemba, R. E., M. T. Myers, and J. P. Collins. 2000. Foraging under the risk of cannibalism leads to divergence in body size among tiger salamander larvae. Oecologia 124: 225 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolnick, D. I. 2001. Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 410: 463 – 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolnick, D. I., R. Svanback, J. A. Fordyce, L. H. Yang, J. M. Davis, C. D. Hulsey, and M. L. Forister. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. American Naturalist 161: 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonner, J. T. 2006. Why size matters: from bacteria to blue whales. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, K., and D. S. Wilson. 1998. Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Animal Behaviour 56: 927 – 936.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConner, M. M., and G. C. White. 1999. Effects of individual heterogeneity in estimating the persistence of small populations. Natural Resource Modeling 12: 109 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConover, D. O., and S. B. Munch. 2002. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science 297: 94 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeAngelis, D. L., K. A. Rose, L. B. Crowder, E. A. Marschall, and D. Lika. 1993. Fish cohort dynamics: application of complementary modeling approaches. American Naturalist 142: 604 – 622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Roos, A. M., L. Persson, and E. Mccauley. 2003. The influence of size-dependent life-history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities. Ecology Letters 6: 473 – 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDukas, R., and E. A. Bernays. 2000. Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97: 2637 – 2640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEklöv, P., and E. E. Werner. 2000. Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae. Oikos 88: 250 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFordyce, J. A. 2006. The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 2377 – 2383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox, G. A. 2005. Extinction risk of heterogeneous populations. Ecology 86: 1191 – 1198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuiman, L. A., and J. H. Cowan. 2003. Behavior and recruitment success in fish larvae: repeatability and covariation of survival skills. Ecology 84: 53 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujiwara, M., B. E. Kendall, and R. M. Nisbet. 2004. Growth autocorrelation and animal size variation. Ecology Letters 7: 106 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGardmark, A., U. Dieckmann, and P. Lundberg. 2003. Life-history evolution in harvested populations: the role of natural predation. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 239 – 257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrimm, V., and J. Uchmański. 2002. Individual variability and population regulation: a model of the significance of within-generation density dependence. Oecologia 131: 196 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93: 145 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJobling, M. 1983. Effect of feeding frequency on food-intake and growth of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. Journal of Fish Biology 23: 177 – 185.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy20078861536.pdf
Size:
194.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.