View Item 

Show simple item record

A hump‐shaped relationship between isolation and abundance of Notonecta irrorata colonists in aquatic mesocosms

dc.contributor.authorMcCauley, Shannon J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNystrom, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Earl E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:48:06Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:48:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcCauley, Shannon J.; Davis, Christopher J.; Nystrom, Jennifer; Werner, Earl E. (2009). "A hump‐shaped relationship between isolation and abundance of Notonecta irrorata colonists in aquatic mesocosms." Ecology 90(9): 2635-2641.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116974
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherNotonecta irrorataen_US
dc.subject.otherpatch connectivityen_US
dc.subject.otherdispersalen_US
dc.subject.othercolonist abundanceen_US
dc.subject.othercolonizationen_US
dc.subject.otherhabitat isolationen_US
dc.subject.otherinter-pond distanceen_US
dc.titleA hump‐shaped relationship between isolation and abundance of Notonecta irrorata colonists in aquatic mesocosmsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116974/1/ecy20099092635.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/08-1785.1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResetarits, W. J. 2005. Habitat selection behaviour links local and regional scales in aquatic systems. Ecology Letters 8: 480 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowler, D. E. and T. G. Benton. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biological Reviews 80: 205 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBriers, R. A. and P. H. Warren. 2000. Population turnover and habitat dynamics in Notonecta (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) metapopulations. Oecologia 123: 216 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodin, T., F. Johansson, and J. Bergsten. 2006. Predator related oviposition site selection of aquatic beetles ( Hydroporus spp.) and effects on offspring life-history. Freshwater Biology 51: 1277 – 1285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDingle, H. 1996. Migration: the biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press. New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinlay, B. J. 2002. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296: 1061 – 1063.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton, W. D. and R. M. May. 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269: 578 – 581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, Illinois, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennedy, J. S. and C. O. Booth. 1963. Co-ordination of successive activities in an aphid. The effect of flight on the settling responses. Journal of Experimental Biology 40: 351 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevin, S. A., H. C. Muller-Landau, R. Nathan, and J. Chave. 2003. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 575 – 604.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCauley, S. J. 2005. Species distributions in anisopteran odonates: effects of local and regional processes. Dissertation. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCauley, S. J. 2006. The effects of dispersal and recruitment limitation on community structure of odonates in artificial ponds. Ecography 29: 585 – 595.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCauley, S. J., C. J. Davis, R. A. Relyea, K. L. Yurewicz, D. K. Skelly, and E. E. Werner. 2008. Metacommunity patterns in larval odonates. Oecologia 158: 329 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoilanen, A. and M. Nieminen. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83: 1131 – 1145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNathan, R., G. Perry, J. T. Cronin, A. E. Strand, and M. L. Cain. 2003. Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103: 261 – 273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRousset, F. and S. Gandon. 2002. Evolution of the distribution of dispersal distance under distance-dependent cost of dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 515 – 523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamps, J. A., J. M. Davis, S. A. Blozis, and K. L. Boundy-Mills. 2007. Genotypic variation in refractory periods and habitat selection by natal dispersers. Animal Behaviour 74: 599 – 610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTelford, R. J., V. Vandvik, and H. J. B. Birks. 2006. Dispersal limitations matter for microbial morphospecies. Science 312: 1015 – 1015.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban, M. C. 2004. Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology 85: 2971 – 2978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVonesh, J. R. and J. C. Buck. 2007. Pesticide alters oviposition site selection in gray treefrogs. Oecologia 154: 219 – 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard, S. A. 1987. Optimal habitat selection in time-limited dispersers. American Naturalist 129: 568 – 579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E., D. K. Skelly, R. A. Relyea, and K. L. Yurewicz. 2007. Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos 116: 1697 – 1712.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinfree, R., J. Dushoff, E. E. Crone, C. B. Schultz, R. V. Budny, N. M. Williams, and C. Kremen. 2005. Testing simple indices of habitat proximity. American Naturalist 165: 707 – 717.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhlroth, P., R. V. Alatalo, A. Holopainen, T. Kumpulainen, and J. Suhonen. 2003. Founder population size and number of source populations enhance colonization success in waterstriders. Oecologia 137: 617 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBinckley, C. A. and W. J. Resetarits. 2005. Habitat selection determines abundance, richness and species composition of beetles in aquatic communities. Biology Letters 1: 370 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlaustein, L., J. Blaustein, and J. Chase. 2005. Chemical detection of the predator Notonecta irrorata by ovipositing Culex mosquitoes. Journal of Vector Ecology 30: 299 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoudreau, S. and M. J. Lawes. 2008. Density- and distance-dependent seedling survival in a ballistically dispersed subtropical tree species Philenoptera sutherlandii. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24: 1 – 8.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy20099092635.pdf
Size:
258.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.