View Item 

Show simple item record

Seed Dispersal And Recruitment Limitation Across Spatial Scales In Temperate Forest Fragments
dc.contributor.authorMcEuen, Amy B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Lisa M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:48:12Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:48:12Z
dc.date.issued2004-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcEuen, Amy B.; Curran, Lisa M. (2004). "Seed Dispersal And Recruitment Limitation Across Spatial Scales In Temperate Forest Fragments." Ecology 85(2): 507-518.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/116983
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherseed limitationen_US
dc.subject.otherseed massen_US
dc.subject.otherseedling recruitmenten_US
dc.subject.otherspatial recruitment limitationen_US
dc.subject.otherTsuga canadensisen_US
dc.subject.otherAcer rubrumen_US
dc.subject.otherBetula alleghaniensisen_US
dc.subject.otherBetula papyriferaen_US
dc.subject.otherdispersal vectoren_US
dc.subject.otherforest fragmentationen_US
dc.subject.otherlandscape ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherseed dispersion patternsen_US
dc.titleSeed Dispersal And Recruitment Limitation Across Spatial Scales In Temperate Forest Fragmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, 430 E. University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/116983/1/ecy2004852507.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/03-4006en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClanahan, T. R., and R. W. Wolfe. 1987. Dispersal of ornithochorous seeds from forest edges in central Florida. Vegetatio 71: 107 – 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes, B. V., and W. H. Wagner. 1981. Michigan trees: a guide to the trees of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruna, E. 2003. Are plant populations in fragmented habitats recruitment limited? Tests for an Amazonian herb. Ecology 84: 932 – 947.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCain, M. L., B. G. Milligan, and A. E. Strand. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany 87: 1217 – 1227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, J. S., B. Beckage, P. Camill, B. Cleveland, J. HilleRisLambers, J. Lichter, J. McLaclan, J. Mohan, and P. Wyckoff. 1999. Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. American Journal of Botany 86: 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, J. S., and Y. Ji. 1995. Fecundity and dispersal in plant populations: implications for structure and diversity. American Naturalist 146: 72 – 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, J. S., E. Macklin, and L. Wood. 1998. Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecological Monographs 68: 213 – 235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurran, L. M., and C. O. Webb. 2000. Experimental tests of the spatiotemporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecological Monographs 70: 129 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalling, J. W., H. C. Muller-Landau, S. J. Wright, and S. P. Hubbell. 2002. Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of neotropical pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90: 714 – 727.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlen, J., and O. Eriksson. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81: 1667 – 1674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHubbell, S. P., R. B. Foster, S. T. O'Brien, K. E. Harms, R. Condit, B. Wechsler, S. J. Wright, and S. Loo de Lao. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest. Science 283: 554 – 557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes, J. W., T. J. Fahey, and B. Browne. 1988. A better seed and litter trap. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 1623 – 1624.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurtt, G. C., and S. W. Pacala. 1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176: 1 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. 1986. The eternal external threat. Pages 286–303 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeatherberry, E. C., and J. S. Spencer. 1996. Michigan forest statistics, 1993. USDA Forest Service, North Central Experimental Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalmborg, P. K., and M. F. Willson. 1988. Foraging ecology of avian frugivores and some consequences for seed dispersal in an Illinois woodlot. Condor 90: 173 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcEuen, A. 2002. Seed dispersal and distributions of woody plants across temperate forest fragments. Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoles, A. T., and M. Westoby. 2002. Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger-seeded species. Oikos 99: 241 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNathan, R., and H. C. Muller-Landau. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 278 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibbens, E., J. A. Silander, and S. W. Pacala. 1994. Seedling recruitment in forests: calibrating models to predict patterns of tree seedling dispersion. Ecology 75: 1794 – 1806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurnbull, L. A., M. J. Crawley, and M. Rees. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88: 225 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurnbull, L. A., M. Rees, and M. J. Crawley. 1999. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. Journal of Ecology 87: 899 – 912.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitney, G. G., and W. J. Somerlot. 1985. A case study of woodland continuity and change in the American midwest. Biological Conservation 31: 265 – 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, M. 1989. Americans and their forests: a historical geography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy2004852507.pdf
Size:
225.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.