View Item 

Show simple item record

Effects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta‐analysis
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, John N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorByrnes, Jarrett E. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCardinale, Bradley J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:48:35Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:48:35Z
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationGriffin, John N.; Byrnes, Jarrett E. K.; Cardinale, Bradley J. (2013). "Effects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta‐analysis." Ecology 94(10): 2180-2187.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117022
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subject.otherbiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.othercomplementarityen_US
dc.subject.otherecosystem functionen_US
dc.subject.otherphylogenetic diversity, PDen_US
dc.subject.othertaxonomic distinctness, TDen_US
dc.subject.othercarnivoresen_US
dc.titleEffects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta‐analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biosciences, Wallace Building, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP United Kingdomen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117022/1/ecy201394102180.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/13-0179.1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, B., A. Hector, P. Saha, and M. Loreau. 2008. Biodiversity effects and transgressive overyielding. Journal of Plant Ecology 1: 95 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonsson, M., F. Johansson, C. Karlsson, and T. Brodin. 2007. Intermediate preditor impact on consumers weakens with increasing predator diversity in the presence of a top-predator. Acta Oecologica—International Journal of Ecology 31: 79 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLetourneau, D. K., J. A. Jedlicka, S. G. Bothwell, and C. R. Moreno. 2009. Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 573 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLosey, J. E., and R. F. Denno. 1998. Positive predator–predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79: 2143 – 2152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem, S., J. E. Duffy, and E. Zavaleta. 2012. The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science 336: 1401 – 1406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNilsson, E., K. Olsson, A. Persson, P. Nystrom, G. Svensson, and U. Nilsson. 2008. Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes. Oecologia 157: 641 – 651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorthfield, T. D., G. B. Snyder, A. R. Ives, and W. E. Snyder. 2010. Niche saturation reveals resource partitioning among consumers. Ecology Letters 13: 338 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, M. I., and J. F. Bruno. 2009. Predator richness has no effect in a diverse marine food web. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 732 – 740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, N. E., J. H. Grabowski, L. M. Ladwig, and J. F. Bruno. 2008. Simulated predator extinctions: predator identity affects survival and recruitment of oysters. Ecology 89: 428 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetchey, O. L., and K. J. Gaston. 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters 5: 402 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, P. B., D. Tilman, F. Isbell, K. Mueller, S. E. Hobbie, D. F. B. Flynn, and N. Eisenhauer. 2012. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336: 589 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitz, O. J., P. A. Hamback, and A. P. Beckerman. 2000. Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. American Naturalist 155: 141 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih, A., G. Englund, and D. Wooster. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 350 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder, G. B., D. L. Finke, and W. E. Snyder. 2008. Predator biodiversity strengthens aphid suppression across single- and multiple-species prey communities. Biological Control 44: 52 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder, W. E., G. B. Snyder, D. L. Finke, and C. S. Straub. 2006. Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecology Letters 9: 789 – 796.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrivastava, D. S., M. W. Cadotte, A. A. M. MacDonald, R. G. Marushia, and N. Mirotchnick. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecology Letters 15: 637 – 648.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStachowicz, J. J., M. Graham, M. E. S. Bracken, and A. I. Szoboszlai. 2008. Diversity enhances cover and stability of seaweed assemblages: the role of heterogeneity and time. Ecology 89: 3008 – 3019.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStraub, C. S., and W. E. Snyder. 2006. Species identity dominates the relationship between predator biodiversity and herbivore suppression. Ecology 87: 277 – 282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStraub, C. S. and W. E. Snyder. 2008. Increasing enemy biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression on two plant species. Ecology 89: 1605 – 1615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerborgh, J., et al. 2001. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294: 1923 – 1926.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTylianakis, J. M., T. M. Rand, A. Kahmen, A.-M. Klein, N. Buchmann, J. Perner, and T. Tscharntke. 2008. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biology 6: e122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTylianakis, J. M., and C. M. Romo. 2010. Natural enemy diversity and biological control: making sense of the context-dependency. Basic and Applied Ecology 11: 657 – 668.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVance-Chalcraft, H. D., J. A. Rosenheim, J. R. Vonesh, C. W. Osenberg, and A. Sih. 2007. The influence of intraguild predation on prey suppression and prey release: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88: 2689 – 2696.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilby, A., S. C. Villareal, L. P. Lan, K. L. Heong, and M. B. Thomas. 2005. Functional benefits of predator species diversity depend on prey identity. Ecological Entomology 30: 497 – 501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodward, G., B. Ebenman, M. Emmerson, J. M. Montoya, J. M. Olesen, A. Valido, and P. H. Warren. 2005. Body size in ecological networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 402 – 409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAquilino, K. M., B. J. Cardinale, and A. R. Ives. 2005. Reciprocal effects of host plant and natural enemy diversity on herbivore suppression: an empirical study of a model tritrophic system. Oikos 108: 275 – 282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBest, R. J., N. C. Caulk, and J. J. Stachowicz. 2013. Trait vs. phylogenetic diversity as predictors of competition and community composition in herbivorous marine amphipods. Ecology Letters 16: 72 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruno, J. F., and B. J. Cardinale. 2008. Cascading effects of predator richness. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 539 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruno, J. F., and M. I. O'Connor. 2005. Cascading effects of predator diversity and omnivory in a marine food web. Ecology Letters 8: 1048 – 1056.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrnes, J. E., and J. J. Stachowicz. 2009. The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs. Ecology 90: 2879 – 2888.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrnes, J., J. J. Stachowicz, K. M. Hultgren, A. R. Hughes, S. V. Olyarnik, and C. S. Thornber. 2006. Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecology Letters 9: 61 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCadotte, M. W., J. Cavender-Bares, D. Tilman, and T. H. Oakley. 2009. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One 4 (5): e5695.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., K. L. Matulich, D. U. Hooper, J. E. Byrnes, E. Duffy, L. Gamfeldt, P. Balvanera, M. I. O'Connor, and A. Gonzalez. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany 98: 572 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., D. S. Srivastava, J. E. Duffy, J. P. Wright, A. L. Downing, M. Sankaran, and C. Jouseau. 2006. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443: 989 – 992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., J. P. Wright, M. W. Cadotte, I. T. Carroll, A. Hector, D. S. Srivastava, M. Loreau, and J. J. Weis. 2007. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 18123 – 18128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasula, P., A. Wilby, and M. B. Thomas. 2006. Understanding biodiversity effects on prey in multi-enemy systems. Ecology Letters 9: 995 – 1004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke, K. R., and R. M. Warwick. 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 523 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran-Stafira, D. L., and C. N. von Ende. 1998. Integrating bacteria into food webs: Studies with Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Ecology 79: 880 – 898.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglass, J. G., J. E. Duffy, and J. F. Bruno. 2008. Herbivore and predator diversity interactively affect ecosystem properties in an experimental marine community. Ecology Letters 11: 598 – 608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection. Oikos 99: 201 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E. 2003. Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 6: 680 – 687.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E. 2009. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 437 – 444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E., B. J. Cardinale, K. E. France, P. B. McIntyre, E. Thebault, and M. Loreau. 2007. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecology Letters 10: 522 – 538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEstes, J. A., et al. 2011. Trophic downgrading of Planet Earth. Science 333: 301 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinke, D. L., and R. F. Denno. 2004. Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429: 407 – 410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinke, D. L., and W. E. Snyder. 2008. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321: 1488 – 1490.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlynn, D. F. B., N. Mirotchnick, M. Jain, M. I. Palmer, and S. Naeem. 2011. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92: 1573 – 1581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffen, B. D. 2006. Detecting emergent effects of multiple predator species. Oecologia 148: 702 – 709.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, J. N., K. L. de la Haye, S. J. Hawkins, R. C. Thompson, and S. J. Jenkins. 2008. Predator diversity and ecosystem functioning: density modifies the effect of resource partitioning. Ecology 89: 298 – 305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffiths, G. J. K., A. Wilby, M. J. Crawley, and M. B. Thomas. 2008. Density-dependent effects of predator species-richness in diversity–function studies. Ecology 89: 2986 – 2993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedges, L. V., J. Gurevitch, and P. S. Curtis. 1999. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150 – 1156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIves, A. R., B. J. Cardinale, and W. E. Snyder. 2005. A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 8: 102 – 116.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy201394102180.pdf
Size:
2.187MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.