View Item 

Show simple item record

Rural Land‐Use Trends In The Conterminous United States, 1950–2000
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Daniel G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Kenneth M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLoveland, Thomas R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTheobald, David M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:48:48Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:48:48Z
dc.date.issued2005-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrown, Daniel G.; Johnson, Kenneth M.; Loveland, Thomas R.; Theobald, David M. (2005). "Rural Land‐Use Trends In The Conterminous United States, 1950–2000." Ecological Applications 15(6): 1851-1863.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-5582en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117044
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherdispersed developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherland-use changeen_US
dc.subject.otheragricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherdemographyen_US
dc.titleRural Land‐Use Trends In The Conterminous United States, 1950–2000en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1041 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Sociology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUSGS, Eros Data Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNatural Resources Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1499 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117044/1/eap20051561851.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/03-5220en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNucci, A., and L. Long. 1996. Spatial and demographic dynamics of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan territory in the United States. International Journal of Population Geography 1: 165 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeopold, A. 1948. A Sand County almanac. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, J., G. C. Daily, P. R. Ehrlich, and G. W. Luck. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421: 530 – 533.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong, L., and A. Nucci. 1997. The “clean break” revisited: is US population again deconcentrating? Environment and Planning A 29: 1355 – 1366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoveland, T. R., T. L. Sohl, S. V. Stehman, A. L. Gallant, K. L. Sayler, and D. E. Napton. 2002. A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land-cover changes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68: 1091 – 1099.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLunetta, R. S., J. G. Lyon, B. Guindon, and C. D. Elvidge. 1998. North American landscape characterization dataset development and data fusion issues. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64: 821 – 829.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaizel, M., R. D. White, S. Gage, L. Osborne, R. Root, S. Stitt, and G. Muehlbach. 1998. Historical interrelationships between population settlement and farmland in the conterminous United States, 1790 to 1992. Pages 5–12 in Perspectives on the land use history of North America: a context for understanding our changing environment: USGS/ BRD/BSR-1998-0003. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonnell, M. J., S. T. A. Pickett, P. Groffman, and P. Bohlen. 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNatural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2000. National Resources Inventory, 1997. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOmernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadeloff, V. C., A. Hagen, P. Voss, D. R. Field, and D. J. Mladenoff. 2000. Exploring the spatial relationship between census and land cover data. Society and Natural Resources 13: 599 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadeloff, V. C., R. B. Hammer, P. R. Voss, A. E. Hagen, D. R. Field, and D. J. Mladenoff. 2001. Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. Forest Science 47: 229 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamankutty, N., and J. Foley. 1999. Estimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands from 1850 to 1992. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8: 381 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnaiberg, J., J. Riera, M. G. Turner, and P. R. Voss. 2002. Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA. Environmental Management 30: 24 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott, J. M., F. W. Davis, R. G. McGhie, R. G. Wright, C. Groves, and J. Estes. 2001. Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecological Applications 11: 999 – 1007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTheobald, D. M. 2001. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geographical Review 91: 544 – 564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, B. L., D. Skole, S. Sanderson, G. Fischer, L. Fresco, and R. Leemans. 1995. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. Joint publication of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (Report No. 35) and the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme (Report No. 7). Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Bureau of the Census. 2001. 2000 census of population and housing: summary file 1 United States. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Agriculture. 1997. Census of agriculture, geographic area series, AC97-CD-Volume 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVesterby, M., and R. W. Heimlich. 1991. Land-use and demographic change: results from fast-growth counties. Land Economics 67: 279 – 291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVesterby, M., and K. S. Krupa. 1997. Major uses of land in the United States, 1997. Statistical Bulletin No. 973. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVining, D. R. Jr., and A. Strauss. 1977. A demonstration that the current deconcentration of population in the United States is a clean break with the past. Environment and Planning A 9: 751 – 758.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogelmann, J. E., T. Sohl, and S. M. Howard. 1998. Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64: 45 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaisanen, P. J., and N. B. Bliss. 2002. Changes in population and agricultural land in conterminous United States counties, 1790 to 1997. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16: 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWardwell, J. M. 1982. The reversal of nonmetropolitan migration loss. Pages 23–33 in D. A. Dillman and D. J. Hobbs, editors. Rural society in the U.S. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, K. M., and G. V. Fuguitt. 2000. Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology 65: 27 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBascom, J., and R. Gordon. 1997. “Country living”: rural non-farm population growth in the Coastal Plain Region of North Carolina. Pages 77–90 in Reshaping the countryside: perceptions and processes of rural change. CABI Publications, Wallinford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeale, C. L. 1975. The revival of population growth in nonmetropolitan America. (ERS-605). Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeale, C. L., and G. V. Fuguitt. 1975. The new pattern of nonmetropolitan population change. Presented at the Conference on Social Demography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyle, P., and K. Halfacree. 1998. Migration in to rural areas. Wiley, Chichester, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, D. G., B. C. Pijanowski, and J.-D. Duh. 2000. Modeling the relationships between land-use and land-cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 59: 247 – 263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowning, C. E. 1990. The rise of the beltways: a powerful force for urban change. Focus on Geography 40 2 18 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, V., S. Archer, M. Chang, and D. Ojima. 2005. Ecological impacts and mitigation strategies for rural land management. Ecological Applications 15: 1879 – 1892.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, V. H., S. Brown, R. A. Haeuber, N. T. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R. J. Naiman, W. E. Riebsame, M. G. Turner, and T. J. Valone. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land: a report from the Ecological Society of America. Ecological Applications 10: 639 – 670.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobson, J. E., E. A. Bright, P. R. Coleman, R. C. Durfee, and B. A. Worley. 2000. A global population database for estimating population at risk. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 66: 849 – 858.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEconomic Research Service. 1999. Historical census of agriculture data, 1949–1974. Records of the Economic Research Service (Record Group 354). Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErickson, R. A., and M. Gentry. 1985. Suburban nucleations. Geographical Review 75: 19 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFonseca, J. W., and D. W. Wong. 2000. Changing patterns of population density in the United States. Professional Geographer 52: 504 – 517.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForstall, R. L. 1996. Population of states and counties of the United States: 1790 to 1990. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrey, W. H., and K. M. Johnson. 1998. Concentrated immigration, restructuring, and the selective deconcentration of the U.S. population. Pages 79–106 in P. J. Boyle and K. H. Halfacree, editors. Migration into rural areas: theories and issues. Wiley, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuguitt, G. V. 1985. The nonmetropolitan turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology 11: 259 – 280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuguitt, G. V., and T. B. Heaton. 1995. The impact of migration on the nonmetropolitan population age structure, 1960–1990. Population Research and Policy Review 14: 215 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFulton, W., R. Pendall, M. Nguyen, and A. Harrison. 2001. Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGresham, C. A. 2002. Sustainability of intensive loblolly pine plantation management in the South Carolina Coastal Plain, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 155: 69 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrimm, N., J. M. Grove, S. T. A. Pickett, and C. L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50: 571 – 584.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammer, R. B., S. I. Stewart, R. Winkler, V. C. Radeloff, and P. R. Voss. 2004. Characterizing spatial and temporal residential density patterns across the U.S. Midwest, 1940– 1990. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 183 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, A. J., R. L. Knight, J. Marzluff, S. Powell, K. Brown, P. H. Gude, and K. Jones. 2005. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications 15: 1893 – 1905.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, A. J., R. Rasker, B. Maxwell, J. J. Rotella, J. Johnson, A. Wright Parmenter, U. Langner, W. Cohen, R. Lawrence, and M. V. Kraska. 2002. Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience 52: 151 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, J. F. 1980. Land use change in a piedmont county. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70 4 492 – 527.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, J. F. 1996. Turmoil in tobaccoland. Geographical Review 86: 550 – 572.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuston, M. A. 2005. The three phases of land-use change: implications for biodiversity. Ecological Applications 15: 1864 – 1878.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceImhoff, M. L., W. T. Lawerence, D. Stutzer, and C. Elvidge. 1998. Assessing the impact of urban sprawl on soil resources in the United States using nighttime “city lights” satellite images and digital soils maps. Pages 13–22 in Perspectives on the land use history of North America: a context for understanding our changing environment. USGS/ BRD/BSR-1998-0003. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, K. M. 1999. The rural rebound. Population Reference Bureau Reports on America 1: 1 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, K. M., and C. L. Beale. 1994. The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology 59: 655 – 667.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
eap20051561851.pdf
Size:
414.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.