View Item 

Show simple item record

Predator Effects On An Assemblage Of Consumers Through Induced Changes In Consumer Foraging Behavior
dc.contributor.authorPeacor, Scott D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Earl E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:48:53Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:48:53Z
dc.date.issued2000-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeacor, Scott D.; Werner, Earl E. (2000). "Predator Effects On An Assemblage Of Consumers Through Induced Changes In Consumer Foraging Behavior." Ecology 81(7): 1998-2010.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117053
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subject.othertrait-mediated indirect interactionen_US
dc.subject.otherAnaxen_US
dc.subject.otherbehavioral induction;en_US
dc.subject.otherdensity-dependence;en_US
dc.subject.otherdensity-mediated indirect interaction;en_US
dc.subject.otherodonate;en_US
dc.subject.otherpredation risk;en_US
dc.subject.otherRanaen_US
dc.subject.otheranuran larvae;en_US
dc.titlePredator Effects On An Assemblage Of Consumers Through Induced Changes In Consumer Foraging Behavioren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117053/1/ecy20008171998.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1998:PEOAAO]2.0.CO;2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, D. C., and J. VanBuskirk. 1995. Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpole species. American Naturalist 145: 211 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolis, G. A., and K. O. Winemiller. 1996. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePomerantz, M. J. 1981. Do higher-order interactions in competition systems really exist? American Naturalist 117: 583 – 591.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea, R. A., and E. E. Werner. 1999. Quantifying the relation between predator-induced behavioral responses and growth performance in larval anurans. Ecology 80: 2117 – 2124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoughgarden, H., and J. Diamond. 1986. Overview: the role of species interactions in community ecology. Pages 333–343 in J. Diamond and T. J. Case, editors. Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitz, O. J. 1998. Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs. American Naturalist 151: 327 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitz, O. J., A. P. Beckerman, and K. M. O'Brien. 1997. Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78: 1388 – 1399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchoener, T. W. 1993. On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities. Pages 365–411 in H. Kawanabe, J. E. Cohen, and K. Iwasaki, editors. Mutualism and community organization: behavioral, theoretical and food web approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSemlitsch, R. D. 1993. Effects of different predators on the survival and development of tadpoles from the hybridon-genetic Rana esculenta complex. Oikos 67: 40 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih, A. 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: An evolutionary and ecological overview. Pages 203–224 in W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, editors. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University of New England Press, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkelly, D. K. 1995. A behavioral tradeoff and its consequences for the distribution of Pseudacris treefrog larvae. Ecology 76: 150 – 164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkelly, D. K., and E. E. Werner. 1990. Behavioral and life historical responses of larval american toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71: 2313 – 2322.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoluk, D. A. 1993. Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology 74: 219 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoluk, D. A., and N. C. Collins. 1988. Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52: 94 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, A. T., and G. G. Mittelbach. 1990. Predation avoidance and community structure: interactions among piscivores, planktivores and plankton. Ecology 71: 2241 – 2254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. H. 1969. The competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with Protozoa. Ecology 50: 362 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. 1981. A further note on community models. American Naturalist 117: 379 – 380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J., and S. Maruca. 1998. Indirect effects with a keystone predator: coexistence and chaos. Theoretical Population Biology 54: 38 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E. 1991. Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72: 1709 – 1720.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E. 1992. Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. American Naturalist 140: S5 – S32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E. E., and B. R. Anholt. 1996. Predator-induced behavioral indirect effects: consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae. Ecology 77: 157 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilbur, H. M., and J. E. Fauth. 1990. Experimental aquatic foodwebs: interactions between two predators and two prey. American Naturalist 135: 176 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWissinger, S., and J. McGrady. 1993. Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects of shared prey. Ecology 74: 207 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWootton, J. T. 1993. Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. American Naturalist 141: 71 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWootton, J. T. 1994. Putting the pieces together: testing the independence of interactions among organisms. Ecology 75: 1544 – 1551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWootton, J. T. 1997. Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: diet, abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds. Ecological Monographs 67: 45 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. A. 1983. Arguments in favor of higher-order interactions. American Naturalist 121: 887 – 891.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. A. 1987. Indirect interactions between species that share a predator: varieties on a theme. Pages 38–54 in W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, editors. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. A. 1993. Indirect effects arising from optimal foraging. Pages 255–279 in H. Kawanabe, J. E. Cohen, and K. Iwasaki, editors. Mutualism and community organization: behavioral, theoretical and food web approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. A. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. American Naturalist 146: 112 – 134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, P. A., B. A. Menge, G. G. Mittelbach, D. Spiller, and P. Yodzis. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs. Pages 371–395 in G. A. Polis and K. O. Winemiller, editors. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, F. R., and W. F. Morris. 1994. A general test for interaction modification. Ecology 75: 1552 – 1559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckerman, A. P., M. Uriarte, and O. J. Schmitz. 1997. Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 10 735 – 10 738.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBillick, I., and T. J. Case. 1994. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecology 75: 1529 – 1543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEklöv, P., and E. E. Werner. 2000. Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality in two anuran species. Oikos 88: 250 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, C. F., and A. Sih. 1990. Experimental studies on behaviorally mediated, indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 71: 1515 – 1522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69: 1865 – 1870.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKratz, K. W. 1996. Effects of stoneflies on local prey population: mechanisms of impact across prey density. Ecology 77: 1573 – 1585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawler, S. P. 1989. Behavioral responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Animal Behavior 38: 1039 – 1047.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima, S. L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions—what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? BioScience 48: 25 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima, S. L., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619 – 640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsuda, H., P. A. Abrams, and M. Hori. 1993. The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators. Oikos 68: 549 – 559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCollum, S. A., and J. VanBuskirk. 1996. Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis.. Evolution 50: 583 – 593.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcIntosh, A. R., and C. R. Townsend. 1996. Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish induced changes to grazer behaviour? Oecologia 108: 174 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPeek, M. A., and B. L. Peckarsky. 1998. Life histories and the strengths of species interactions: combining mortality, growth, and fecundity effects. Ecology 79: 867 – 879.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMenge, B. A. 1994. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: pattern and importance. Ecological Monographs 65: 21 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessina, F. J. 1981. Plant protection as a consequence of an ant–membracid mutulism: interactions on goldonrod ( Solidago sp.). Ecology 62: 1433 – 1440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, T. E., and W. C. Kerfoot. 1987. Redefining indirect effects. Pages 33–37 in W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, editors. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, US.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeill, W. E. 1974. The community matrix and interdependence of the competition coefficients. American Naturalist 108: 399 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeacor, S. P., and E. E. Werner. 1997. Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology 78: 1146 – 1156.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy20008171998.pdf
Size:
135.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.