View Item 

Show simple item record

Impact Of Curve Construction And Community Dynamics On The Species–Time Relationship
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorOstling, Annetteen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarte, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authordel Moral, Rogeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:50:36Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2007-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarey, Susan; Ostling, Annette; Harte, John; del Moral, Roger (2007). "Impact Of Curve Construction And Community Dynamics On The Species–Time Relationship." Ecology 88(9): 2145-2153.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117224
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherspecies richnessen_US
dc.subject.othertimeen_US
dc.subject.otherdiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherspecies–area relationshipen_US
dc.titleImpact Of Curve Construction And Community Dynamics On The Species–Time Relationshipen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3114 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnergy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3050 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-5325 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117224/1/ecy20078892145.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/06-1889.1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreston, F. W. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41: 611 – 627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGotelli, N. J., and R. K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, J. S., K. I. Ugland, and J. Lambshead. 2004a. On species accumulation and species–area curves. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 587.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, J. S., K. I. Ugland, and J. Lambshead. 2004b. Species accumulation and species area curves: a comment on Scheiner (2003). Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 473.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, J. L., J. Harte, and A. Ostling. 2003. Species richness, endemism and abundance patterns: tests of two fractal models in a serpentine grassland. Ecology Letters 6: 919 – 928.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadly, E. A., and B. A. Maurer. 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of species diversity in montane mammal communities of western North America. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 477 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarte, J., E. Conlisk, A. Ostling, J. L. Green, and A. B. Smith. 2005. A theory of spatial structure in ecological communities at multiple spatial scales. Ecological Monographs 75: 179 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHe, F. L., P. Legendre, and J. V. LaFrankie. 1996. Spatial pattern of diversity in a tropical rain forest in Malaysia. Journal of Biogeography 23: 57 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLomolino, M. V. 2000. Ecology's most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27: 17 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17: 373 – 387.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacArthur, R., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKinney, M. L., and D. L. Frederick. 1999. Species–time curves and population extremes: ecological patterns in the fossil record. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 641 – 650.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, P. B., and W. Lauenroth. 2003. The power of time: spatiotemporal scaling of species diversity. Ecology Letters 6: 749 – 756.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenzweig, M. L. 1998. Preston's ergodic conjecture: the accumulation of species in space and time. Pages 311 – 348 in Drake, J. A. Biodiversity dynamics: turnover of populations, taxa, and communities. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSax, D. F., and S. D. Gaines. 2003. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 561 – 566.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSax, D. F., S. D. Gaines, and J. H. Brown. 2002. Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. American Naturalist 160: 766 – 783.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheiner, S. M. 2003. Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 441 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheiner, S. M. 2004. A melange of curves: further dialogue about species–area relationships. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 479 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, C. D.. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjorve, E. 2003. Shapes and functions of species–area curves: a review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography 30: 827 – 835.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUgland, K. I., J. S. Gray, and K. E. Ellingsen. 2003. The species–accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 888 – 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlrich, W. 2006. Decomposing the process of species accumulation into area dependent and time dependent parts. Ecological Research 21: 578 – 585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, E. P. 2004. Two-phase species–time relationships in North American land birds. Ecology Letters 7: 329 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, E. P., P. B. Adler, W. K. Lauenroth, R. A. Gill, D. Greenberg, D. M. Kaufman, A. Rassweiler, J. A. Rusak, M. D. Smith, J. R. Steinbeck, R. B. Waide, and J. Yao. 2006. A comparison of the species–time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. Oikos 112: 185 – 195.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, P. B., E. P. White, W. K. Lauenroth, D. M. Kaufman, A. Rassweiler, and J. A. Rusak. 2005. Evidence for a general species–time–area relationship. Ecology 86: 2032 – 2039.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9: 95 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, J. H., S. K. M. Ernest, J. M. Parody, and J. P. Haskell. 2001. Regulation of diversity: Maintenance of species richness in changing environments. Oecologia 126: 321 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColwell, R. K., and J. A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 345: 101 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCondit, R., S. P. Hubbell, J. V. Lafrankie, R. Sukumar, N. Manokaran, R. B. Foster, and P. S. Ashton. 1996. Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. Journal of Ecology 84: 549 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnell, J. H., and R. O. Slatyer. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111: 1119 – 1144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnor, E. F., and E. D. McCoy. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. American Naturalist 113: 791 – 833.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornell, H. V., and J. H. Lawton. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 1 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, V. H., F. J. Swanson, and C. M. Crisafulli. 2005. Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies, N., and D. S. Smith. 1998. Munroe revisited: A survey of West Indian butterfly faunas and their species–area relationship. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 7: 285 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencedel Moral, R. 1983. Initial recovery of subalpine vegetation on Mount St. Helens, Washington. American Midland Naturalist 109: 72 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencedel Moral, R. 2000. Succession and local species turnover on Mount St. Helens, Washington. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 85: 51 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencedel Moral, R., and L. C. Bliss. 1993. Mechanisms of primary succession: insights resulting from the eruption of Mount St. Helens. Advances in Ecological Research 24: 1 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiamond, J. M., and E. Mayr. 1976. Species–area relation for birds of Solomon Archipelago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 73: 262 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFridley, J. D., R. K. Peet, T. R. Wentworth, and P. S. White. 2005. Connecting fine- and broad-scale species–area relationships of southeastern U.S. flora. Ecology 86: 1172 – 1177.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy20078892145.pdf
Size:
131.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.