Show simple item record

Characterization and quantification of the fungal microbiome in serial samples from individuals with cystic fibrosis

dc.contributor.authorWillger, Sven D
dc.contributor.authorGrim, Sharon L
dc.contributor.authorDolben, Emily L
dc.contributor.authorShipunova, Anna
dc.contributor.authorHampton, Thomas H
dc.contributor.authorMorrison, Hilary G
dc.contributor.authorFilkins, Laura M
dc.contributor.authorO‘Toole, George A
dc.contributor.authorMoulton, Lisa A
dc.contributor.authorAshare, Alix
dc.contributor.authorSogin, Mitchell L
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Deborah A
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-18T19:02:43Z
dc.date.available2016-02-18T19:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-03
dc.identifier.citationMicrobiome. 2014 Nov 03;2(1):40
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117373en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Human-associated microbial communities include fungi, but we understand little about which fungal species are present, their relative and absolute abundances, and how antimicrobial therapy impacts fungal communities. The disease cystic fibrosis (CF) often involves chronic airway colonization by bacteria and fungi, and these infections cause irreversible lung damage. Fungi are detected more frequently in CF sputum samples upon initiation of antimicrobial therapy, and several studies have implicated the detection of fungi in sputum with worse outcomes. Thus, a more complete understanding of fungi in CF is required. Results We characterized the fungi and bacteria in expectorated sputa from six CF subjects. Samples were collected upon admission for systemic antibacterial therapy and upon the completion of treatment and analyzed using a pyrosequencing-based analysis of fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and bacterial 16S rDNA sequences. A mixture of Candida species and Malassezia dominated the mycobiome in all samples (74%–99% of fungal reads). There was not a striking trend correlating fungal and bacterial richness, and richness showed a decline after antibiotic therapy particularly for the bacteria. The fungal communities within a sputum sample resembled other samples from that subject despite the aggressive antibacterial therapy. Quantitative PCR analysis of fungal 18S rDNA sequences to assess fungal burden showed variation in fungal density in sputum before and after antibacterial therapy but no consistent directional trend. Analysis of Candida ITS1 sequences amplified from sputum or pure culture-derived genomic DNA from individual Candida species found little (<0.5%) or no variation in ITS1 sequences within or between strains, thereby validating this locus for the purpose of Candida species identification. We also report the enhancement of the publically available Visualization and Analysis of Microbial Population Structures (VAMPS) tool for the analysis of fungal communities in clinical samples. Conclusions Fungi are present in CF respiratory sputum. In CF, the use of intravenous antibiotic therapy often does not profoundly impact bacterial community structure, and we observed a similar stability in fungal species composition. Further studies are required to predict the effects of antibacterials on fungal burden in CF and fungal community stability in non-CF populations.
dc.titleCharacterization and quantification of the fungal microbiome in serial samples from individuals with cystic fibrosis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117373/1/40168_2014_Article_67.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/2049-2618-2-40en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderWillger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2016-02-18T19:02:44Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.