Show simple item record

Ending Executive Manipulations of Incentive Compensation

dc.contributor.authorAvci, Sureyya Burcu
dc.contributor.authorSchipani, Cindy A.
dc.contributor.authorSeyhun, H. Nejat
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T19:35:59Z
dc.date.available2016-03-01T19:35:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier1305en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Corporation Law Forthcomingen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117413
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we analyze whether the manipulation of stock options still continues to this day. Our evidence shows that executives continue to employ a variety of manipulative devices to increase their compensation, including backdating, bullet-dodging, and spring- loading. Overall, we find that as a result of these manipulative devices executives are able to increase their compensation by about 6%. We suggest a simple new rule to end all dating games in executive compensation. We propose that all grants of stock options in executive compensation be awarded on a daily pro-rata basis and priced accordingly. This proposal would leave no incentive to game option grant dates or manipulate information flow.en_US
dc.subjectincentive compensationen_US
dc.subjectstock optionsen_US
dc.subjectbackdatingen_US
dc.subjectsecurities regulationen_US
dc.subjectcorporate governanceen_US
dc.subject.classificationFinanceen_US
dc.subject.classificationLaw, History, Communicationen_US
dc.titleEnding Executive Manipulations of Incentive Compensationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFinanceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117413/1/1305_Schipani.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.