Show simple item record

Carbon Sources, Sinks and Offsets in Global Forest Investments

dc.contributor.authorSuhadolnik, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yuanyuan
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi, Devina
dc.contributor.authorYang, Mengjie
dc.contributor.authorXi, Nan
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Kate
dc.contributor.advisorXu, Ming
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-29T15:46:32Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2016-04-29T15:46:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.date.submitted2016-04
dc.identifier289en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117635
dc.description.abstractGlobal Forest Partners (GFP) is a forestry investment advisor that manages over 750,000 hectares of timberland around the globe on behalf of their investors. The primary objective of this analysis was to quantify GFP’s annual net carbon footprint, including both carbon sequestration occurring through their forest assets as well as the emissions that are attributable to the company. Additionally, we will provide a modeling tool with which GFP can continue to monitor their carbon impact in the coming years. We structured our carbon footprint analysis based on the methodology established by the California Air Resources Board for use in the California cap-and-trade system and the methodology used in the Verified Carbon Standard for global voluntary carbon markets. After performing our carbon accounting analysis, we sought to provide a global perspective of carbon pricing mechanisms. Due to low carbon prices, historic volatility within global carbon markets, and impending large-scale changes within international carbon trading, it does not appear to be pressing for GFP to pursue a monetization of their carbon sequestration at present. In order to properly prepare for an impending phase of expansion and interconnectedness in the global carbon marketplace, we recommend that GFP begin considering the potential carbon additionality impacts of future acquisitions. GFP should also take steps during its asset evaluation process to determine whether undertaking a forestry carbon offset project in any of its existing forests would be feasible from a regulatory and financial standpoint. Key trends to anticipate include the establishment of a Chinese emissions trading scheme by 2020, a potential increase in carbon trading within the United States, and a potential increase in international carbon trading as a result of the 2015 Conference of Parties 21 talks. As a result of this project, GFP will gain a firm foundation of knowledge regarding the methods involved in calculating forest carbon sequestration, evaluating additionality, assessing the value proposition for forestry carbon offset projects, and understanding the operation and outlooks of major global carbon markets.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcarbonen_US
dc.subjectforestsen_US
dc.subjectcarbon marketsen_US
dc.subjectcarbon sequestrationen_US
dc.titleCarbon Sources, Sinks and Offsets in Global Forest Investmentsen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamesrfreemaen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamenathanesen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnameyangyyyen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamedevinaten_US
dc.identifier.uniqnameyangmjen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamenanxien_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117635/1/Carbon_Sources,_sinkes,_and_offset_in_global_forest_FINAL.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.