Examining the Influence of Alternative Technologies on the Group Technology Adoption Process
dc.contributor.author | Ammari, Tawfiq | |
dc.contributor.author | You, Sangseok | |
dc.contributor.author | Robert, Lionel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-04T15:17:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-04T15:17:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Tawfiq A., You, S. and Robert, L. P. (2015). Examining the Influence of Alternative Technologies on the Group Technology Adoption Process in the 75rd Academy of Management Proceedings, ( ), August 7-11, Vancouver, B.C., Canada | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117653 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is a long history of study to understand of why work groups do or do not adopt new collaboration technologies. However, research has focused on only one technology. The underlying assumption is that work groups can adopt or not adopt that one technology based on that technology alone. In making this assumption, researchers may have failed to realize the importance of alternative technologies in the adoption process or the fact that groups can adopt more than one technology. To address this issue, we examined an attempt by a scientific research organization to have its work groups adopt a particular group- collaboration technology. Although the target technology was more than appropriate for the task and the organization provided all the resources needed for work groups to adopt the technology, it largely failed. This was in large part due to the incorporation of two alternative collaboration technologies that acted as substitutes. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | AOM | en_US |
dc.subject | Teamwork | en_US |
dc.subject | technology acceptance | en_US |
dc.subject | Group technology acceptance | en_US |
dc.subject | appropriation | en_US |
dc.subject | technology appropriation | en_US |
dc.subject | team technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | technology adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | collaboration technology | en_US |
dc.subject | work teams | en_US |
dc.subject | Group Technology Adoption | en_US |
dc.subject | alternative Technologies | en_US |
dc.subject | scientific research organization | en_US |
dc.subject | team | en_US |
dc.title | Examining the Influence of Alternative Technologies on the Group Technology Adoption Process | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Information, School of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117653/1/AOM 2015 Submission 16464 Group Adoption Process.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.16464abstract | |
dc.identifier.source | Academy of Management Proceedings | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Information, School of (SI) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.