Show simple item record

Freedom in Balance: Does Ideological Struggle Preserve Optimum Freedom?

dc.contributor.authorMooney, John M.
dc.contributor.advisorKennedy, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-09T16:28:38Z
dc.date.available2016-05-09T16:28:38Z
dc.date.issued2004-11-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117865
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will explore how ideological thought manifests itself. On a linear spectrum, social, economic and political thoughts can be categorized into left-wing liberalism and right-wing conservatism. While the definition of each is elusive, generally the differences may be identified around certain issues inclusive of the size, role and morality of government, the limits of Bill of Rights protections, taxation and spending, private and societal needs, among others. Further, the liberal principles and goals of extreme left-wing egalitarianism will be shown to be diametrically opposed to the conservative aspects of extremist right-wing fascism. Although moderates compromise their views between conservative and liberal thought, the largest difference in American politics is represented between moderates and extremists.
dc.subjectpolitical ideals
dc.subjectmoderate
dc.subjectextremist
dc.subjectliberalism
dc.subjectconservatism
dc.titleFreedom in Balance: Does Ideological Struggle Preserve Optimum Freedom?
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster's
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCollege of Arts and Sciences: Liberal Studies
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan
dc.contributor.committeememberRubenstein, Bruce A.
dc.contributor.committeememberZeff, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusFlint
dc.identifier.uniqnamejomooney
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117865/1/Mooney.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.