Show simple item record

Organic Scintillators in Nonproliferation Applications With a Hybridized Double-Pulse Rejection Technique.

dc.contributor.authorBourne, Mark Mitchell
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-10T19:30:48Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2016-06-10T19:30:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120708
dc.description.abstractAlternative detection technologies are crucial to meeting demand for neutron detectors, for the current production of He-3, which has been the classical neutron choice, is insufficient. Organic scintillators are a strong candidate as a He-3 alternative due to their high efficiency, fast timing properties, and capabilities for separately identifying gamma-rays and neutrons through pulse shape discrimination (PSD). However, the use of organic scintillators in environments with numerous gamma rays can be limited because overlapping gamma-ray events can be misclassified as neutron events during PSD. To solve this problem, a new, hybridized double-pulse cleaning technique, consisting of three separate cleaning algorithms, was developed. The technique removes gamma-ray double pulses while preserving as many neutron pulses as possible. This technique was applied to separate experiments of Cf-252 and a gamma-ray source when measuring at a 100-kHz count rate and a field of 1000 incident gamma rays per incident neutron. It was found that stilbene scintillators were capable of intrinsic neutron efficiencies between 15-19% when measuring bare Cf-252 and 13-17% when exposed to the gamma-ray field. Misclassification rates ranged from 10-6-10-5, a factor-of-5 better than both the EJ-309 liquid and BB3-5 plastic. Next, plutonium experiments were performed with stilbene to determine which cleaning algorithm was best for each sample. A clear correlation was found that related the correct method of cleaning to the measured gamma ray-to-neutron ratio. When the measured gamma ray-to-neutron ratio is 10 or below, the template cleaning algorithm is preferred, while the fractional and hybrid cleaning algorithms are preferred when the gamma ray-to-neutron ratio is 100 or greater. Discriminating neutron sources such as Cf-252 or AmLi from SNM samples such as plutonium is a top priority in nonproliferation. We demonstrate that time-correlated experiments, utilizing both PSD-capable plastic and stilbene scintillators, can perform this discrimination. Comparing the single and correlated neutron from each source, measurement systems based on stilbene and PSD-capable plastic scintillators discriminated plutonium metal and oxide samples from a Cf-252 spontaneous fission source.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectneutron detection
dc.subjectorganic scintillators
dc.subjectpulse shape discrimination
dc.titleOrganic Scintillators in Nonproliferation Applications With a Hybridized Double-Pulse Rejection Technique.
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhD
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberPozzi, Sara A.
dc.contributor.committeememberSchwarz, Thomas Andrew
dc.contributor.committeememberClarke, Shaun D.
dc.contributor.committeememberWehe, David K.
dc.contributor.committeememberGueorguiev, Andrey
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/120708/1/mmbourne_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.