A Novel Approach to Fostering Next Generation Science Knowledge in Middle School Students: Introducing Double-Blinded Reviews in Classroom Formative Assessments.
dc.contributor.author | Zaidi, Sania Zahra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-10T19:31:39Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-10T19:31:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120773 | |
dc.description.abstract | Recent reform in K-12 science advocates for fostering a new type of integrated knowledge, where disciplinary ideas are learned through the practices of scientists and engineers. Moreover, when fostering this knowledge, the reform emphasizes the need to illuminate to students the practices of scientists and engineers and to promote learning by making learning relevant to students’ lives. This dissertation addresses the reform’s vision in the context of classroom formative assessments. An online assessment called the 4R Activity was designed and embedded in a middle school climate change curriculum. Similar to scientists and engineers, students in the 4R Activity built knowledge products by receiving and providing double-blinded reviews and using the reviews to revise their products. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to investigate: (a) students’ achievement outcomes before and after participating in the 4R Activity; (b) the quality of the products generated during the 4R Activity; and (c) students’ perspectives on different aspects of the 4R Activity. A fixed effects regression model was estimated to compare the achievement outcomes of the 4R Activity participants (N=173, intervention) to those who used a conventional formative assessment (N=226, control) within the same curriculum. The 4R Activity participants demonstrated achievement gains that were, on average, 2.2 times higher than that of the control group. Furthermore, in the 4R Activity the achievement gains were highest for traditionally underrepresented groups in the sciences (e.g., females, African Americans). Next, qualitative techniques were used to examine the patterns and characteristics of students’ artifacts (e.g., revised products, peer review) over three 4R Activity cycles. Findings revealed that over time students incorporated feedback to construct high quality knowledge products and provided comprehensive peer reviews. Twenty-two students’ perspectives on the 4R Activity were documented through semi-structured interviews. Students’ accounts revealed their awareness of connections between aspects of the 4R Activity and their interests (e.g., playing sports) as well as connections between the activity and the work of scientists and engineers. Together the studies showcase how a formative assessment resource can be used to promote learning, engage students in the practices of professionals and elicit students’ interests and experiences to inform further learning. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | formative assessments | |
dc.subject | K-12 science education | |
dc.subject | mixed methods | |
dc.subject | online feedback system | |
dc.subject | Next Generation Science Standards | |
dc.subject | Peer Review | |
dc.title | A Novel Approach to Fostering Next Generation Science Knowledge in Middle School Students: Introducing Double-Blinded Reviews in Classroom Formative Assessments. | |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Educational Studies | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Songer, Nancy Butler | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Bricker, Leah Ann | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | McCall, Brian P | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Miller, Kevin F | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/120773/1/sania_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.