Show simple item record

Feedback for Teacher Learning and the Improvement of Instruction: Conceptualization, Preparation, and Practice.

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Kristin Smith
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-10T19:31:48Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2016-06-10T19:31:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120785
dc.description.abstractAlthough the term “feedback” is used pervasively in current efforts aimed at the improvement of teaching in the United States, what constitutes feedback seems to be assumed and, thus, not adequately conceptualized or operationalized. Through two distinct essays that investigate feedback theory and practice, this dissertation offers feedback as a promising high-leverage practice for the improvement of instruction. The first essay explores the underconceptualization of feedback in the discourse on the improvement of teaching through a representative review of the feedback literature in the fields of education, performance management, and organizational psychology. The aim of this study was to uncover what researchers know, and still need to learn, about feedback in order to inform the development of feedback practices, processes, and environments that can effectively support teacher learning and instructional improvement. The second essay is a case study of the school supervision course within one graduate-level school leadership preparation program. This study explored: (1) what students in the course were taught about feedback as a means to improve teaching, and how they were taught these things, and (2) what five focal students from the course took up from the learning opportunities provided in the course, including their opportunities for practice. Findings from these studies indicate that feedback for the improvement of instruction is a complex, interactive practice composed of multiple practices. Though feedback has not been sufficiently conceptualized in the literature of any field to be a thorough guide to effective practice (Boud & Molloy, 2013; Sutton et al., 2012), there is an extant research base that can inform future research and practice in teacher learning and school leadership. The studies in this dissertation point to the need for further research to identify the constituent practices, strategies, and techniques that compose effective feedback practice in order to inform high-quality preparation and support of both teachers and school leaders.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectTeacher Learning
dc.subjectSchool Supervision
dc.subjectSchool Leadership
dc.titleFeedback for Teacher Learning and the Improvement of Instruction: Conceptualization, Preparation, and Practice.
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational Studies
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberBall, Deborah Loewenberg
dc.contributor.committeememberSutcliffe, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.committeememberBain, Robert B
dc.contributor.committeememberPeurach, Donald Joseph
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/120785/1/kesmit_1.pdf
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5897-6661
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.