View Item 

Show simple item record

Public Perceptions of Regulatory Costs, Their Uncertainty and Interindividual Distribution
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Branden B.
dc.contributor.authorFinkel, Adam M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T18:21:47Z
dc.date.available2017-07-10T14:31:42Zen
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, Branden B.; Finkel, Adam M. (2016). "Public Perceptions of Regulatory Costs, Their Uncertainty and Interindividual Distribution." Risk Analysis 36(6): 1148-1170.
dc.identifier.issn0272-4332
dc.identifier.issn1539-6924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/122430
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherperceptions
dc.subject.otherregulatory costs
dc.subject.otheruncertainty
dc.subject.otherequity
dc.subject.otherEconomic literacy
dc.titlePublic Perceptions of Regulatory Costs, Their Uncertainty and Interindividual Distribution
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/122430/1/risa12532.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/122430/2/risa12532_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/122430/3/risa12532-sup-0001-SupMat.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/risa.12532
dc.identifier.sourceRisk Analysis
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchreier HMC, Chen E. Socioeconomic status and the health of youth: A multilevel, multidomain approach to conceptualizing pathways. Psychological Bulletin, 2013; 139: 606 – 654.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSadd JL, Pastor M, Morello‐Frosch R, Scoggins J, Jesdale B. Playing it safe: Cumulative impact and social vulnerability through an environmental justice screening method in the south coast air basin, California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011; 8: 1441 – 1459.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEiser JR, Bostrom A, Burton I, Johnston JM, McClure D, Paton D, van der Pligt J, White MP. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2012; 1: 5 – 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19 ( 4 ): 689 – 701.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987; 236 ( 4799 ): 280 – 285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner JS, Gonzalez RM, Small DA, Fischhoff B. Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 2003; 14 ( 2 ): 144 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978; 4 ( 6 ): 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWildavsky A. Richer is safer. Public Interest, 1980; 60: 23 – 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoglianese C, Finkel AM, Carrigan C (eds). Does Regulation Kill Jobs ? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 1995; 15: 137 – 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronsteen J, Buccafusco C, Masur JS. Well‐being analysis vs. cost‐benefit analysis. Duke Law Journal, 2013; 62: 1603 – 1689.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCumming RB. Reflections on decisions, options, and risks. Risk Analysis, 1981; 1: 97 – 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOtway H, Thomas K. Reflections on risk perception and policy. Risk Analysis, 1982; 2: 69 – 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 1982; 2: 83 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachlis GE, Rosa EA. Desired risk: Broadening the social amplification of risk framework. Risk Analysis, 1990; 10 ( 1 ): 161 – 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegrist M, Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20 ( 5 ): 713 – 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDaniels TL. Comparing expressed and revealed preferences for risk reduction: Different hazards and question frames. Risk Analysis, 1988; 8: 593 – 604.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendeloff JM, Kaplan RM. Are large differences in “lifesaving” costs justified? A psychometric study of the relative value placed on preventing deaths. Risk Analysis, 1989; 9: 349 – 363.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment (Chapter 5). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Federal motor vehicle safety standards: Rear visibility (final rule). Federal Register, April 7, 2014; 79: 19178 – 19250 at 19239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegrist J, Ferson S, Finkel A. Ravnoprochnost (“equi‐sturdiness”): Avoiding partially‐hidden and unnecessary uncertainty in cost‐benefit calculations, 2013. Manuscript in review. Available at: https://sites.google.com/a/adamfinkel.com/nsfprojectoutputs/home.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkel AM. The cost of nothing trumps the value of everything: The failure of regulatory economics to keep pace with improvements in quantitative risk analysis. Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, 2014, 4 ( 1 ): 91 – 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraus N, Malmfors, T, Slovic P. Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks. Risk Analysis, 1992; 12: 215 – 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacGregor DG, Slovic P, Malmfors T. “ How exposed is exposed enough?” Lay inferences about chemical exposure. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19: 649 – 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979; 47: 263 – 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta‐analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1999; 125: 367 – 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson BB, Slovic P. Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: Initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust. Risk Analysis, 1995; 14: 185 – 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14: 1101 – 1108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Culture and identity‐protective cognition: Explaining the white‐male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007; 4: 465 – 505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonroe KB. Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 1973; 10: 70 – 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZauberman G, Kyu Kim B, Malkoc SA, Bettman JR. Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 2009; 46: 543 – 556.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheffrin SM. Perceptions of fairness in the crucible of tax policy. Chapter 9, pp. 309 – 340 in Slemrod J (ed). Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkel AM, Ferson S, Harrington W, Johnson BB. Transferring to Regulatory Economics the Risk‐Analysis Approaches to Uncertainty, Interindividual Variability, and Other Phenomena. National Science Foundation grant #0756539, Decision Making, Risk, and Uncertainty program (Human and Social Dynamics of Change competition). National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA, 2007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrington W, Safirova, E, Coleman C, Houde S, Finkel AM. Distributional consequences of public policies: An example from the management of urban vehicular travel. Available at: https://sites.google.com/a/adamfinkel.com/nsfprojectoutputs/home.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHattis DB, Finkel AM. Barriers to a more even‐handed treatment of uncertainties in projected economic costs and health benefits of environmental regulations. Manuscript in review, 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCranor, C, Finkel AM. Toward recognizing individual benefits and costs in cost‐benefit analysis. Manuscript in review, Regulation and Governance, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkel AM, Johnson BB. A “top‐down” elicitation of the value of a statistical life: Results from a new stated‐preference survey. Manuscript in preparation, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalstad WB, Rebeck K. Assessing the economic knowledge and economic opinions of adults. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2002; 42: 921 – 935.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafir E, Diamond P, Tversky A. Money illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997; 112: 341 – 374.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafir E, Thaler R. Buy now, consume later, spend never: Mental accounting through time. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2006; 27: 694 – 712.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978; 4: 551 – 578.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn KM. Message format and audience values: Interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2000; 20: 41 – 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell M, Dunwoody S, Griffin R, Neuwirth K. Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk. Public Understanding of Science, 2007; 16: 323 ‐ 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOccupational Safety & Health Administration. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium: Final rule. Federal Register, 2006; 71 ( 39 ): 10100 – 10385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinder SH, Marko D, Sexton, K. Cumulative cancer risk from air pollution in Houston: Disparities in risk burden and social disadvantage. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42 ( 12 ): 4312 – 4322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFullerton D, Heutel G. The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 2007; 91: 571 – 591.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorfman R. Incidence of the benefits and costs of environmental programs. American Economic Review, 1977; 67: 333 – 340.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double‐bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991; 73: 1255 – 1263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 1988; 95: 371 – 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 2007; 26: 672 – 680.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 2001; 21: 37 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson BW. Anchoring and adjustment in judgments under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990; 16: 665 – 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns WJ, Peters E, Slovic P. Risk perception and the economic crisis: A longitudinal study of the trajectory of perceived risk. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32: 659 – 677.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrington W, Morgenstern RD, Nelson P. On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2000; 19: 297 – 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Office of Technology Assessment. Gauging Control Technology and Regulatory Impacts in Occupational Safety and Health: An Appraisal of OSHA's Analytic Approach, report #OTA‐ENV‐635, September 1995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodstein E, Hodges H. Polluted data: Overestimating environmental costs. American Prospect, 1997; 36: 64 – 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson BB. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk perception. RISK: Issues in Health & Safety, 1993; 4: 189 – 212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDieckmann NF, Johnson BB, Gregory R, Mayorga M, Han P, Slovic P. Public perceptions of expert disagreement: Expert incompetence or a complex and random world? Public Understanding of Science, 0963662515603271, first published on September 7, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman R, Novemsky L. Public Perception of Risk Assessment — A Pilot Study. Final Report to the New Jersey Institute of Technology Hazardous Substance Management Research Center, Newark, NJ, September 1988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman R. Public Knowledge and Perceptions of Risk Assessment. The Legitimation of Risk Assessment Through Knowledge of its Process. Final Report to the New Jersey Institute of Technology Hazardous Substance Management Research Center, Newark, NJ, September 1990.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTal A. Assessing the environmental movement's attitudes toward risk assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997; 31: 470 – 476.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson BB. Erratum. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24:781, correcting Johnson BB. Further notes on public response to uncertainty in risk and science. Risk Analysis, 2003; 23: 781 – 789.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarle TC, Siegrist M. Trust, confidence and cooperation model: A framework for understanding the relation between trust and risk perception. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2008; 8: 17 – 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite MP, Eiser JR. A social judgement analysis of trust: People as intuitive detection theorists. Pp. 95 – 116 in Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H (eds). Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind. London, UK: Earthscan, 2007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson BB, White MP. The importance of multiple performance criteria for understanding trust in risk managers. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30: 1099 – 1115.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson LA, Hammitt JK, Zeckhauser R. The role of distribution in U.S. regulatory analysis and decision making, 2014. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/index.php/content/download/70616/1255274/version/1/file/RPP_2014_03.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer GW, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Nair I, Lave LB. What risks are people concerned about ? Risk Analysis, 1991; 11: 303 – 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacGregor D. Worry over technological activities and life concerns. Risk Analysis 1991; 11: 315 – 324.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
risa12532.pdf
Size:
502.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
risa12532_am.pdf
Size:
1.272MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
risa12532-sup-0001-SupMat.pdf
Size:
120.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.