Show simple item record

Factors Influencing Dental Implant Survival & Success: A Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo-Hao
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T15:45:37Z
dc.date.available2017-08-01T14:25:48Zen
dc.date.issued2016-06-30
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/122727
dc.description.abstractBackground: With the increasing number of implants affected by peri-implant diseases, disease prevention by identifying and managing risk factors are crucial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to study the odds ratios (ORs) of various risks related to implant success. Materials and Methods: Subjects with at least one implant placed and with periapical or bitewing radiographs taken at the time of prosthesis placement and at least one year follow-up after implant restoration were included. Data at patient and implant level, including surgical related factors, restorative related factors, and peri-implant parameters were recorded. The associations and ORs between implant success and the recorded variables were analyzed. Results: A total of 550 implants (mean 6.25 year follow-up) from 200 subjects were included. Treatment success was found in 75.5% of the subjects and 71.82% of the implants. Implant success is associated with the following variables: non-smokers (OR= 3.68), non-diabetes (OR= 5.85), healthy periodontium (OR= 7.13), and single implant placement (OR= 3.58). At implant level, implant success is associated with provider experiences (OR= 4.40). Furthermore, implant-supported single crowns were found with higher success rate compared to bridge restoration (OR= 3.62); implant-supported restorations without cantilever design had higher success rate (OR= 6.94). Probing depth (OR= 3.51) was also found to be negatively associated with implant success. Conclusion: Prevalence of peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositits and peri-implantitis) is high, affecting 69.5% of the patients and 77.6% of the implants. Factors such as smoking, diabetes, history of periodontal disease, number of implants placed, provider level, restoration type and cantilever design have significant impact on implant success. Probing depth is a good indicator to determine peri-implant health but not bleeding on probing.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectdental implantsen_US
dc.subjectperi-implantitisen_US
dc.subjectimplant-supported dental prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.titleFactors Influencing Dental Implant Survival & Success: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePeridonticsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberOh, Tae-Ju
dc.contributor.committeememberGeorge, Furat
dc.contributor.committeememberChan, Hsun-Liang
dc.identifier.uniqnameghlinen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/122727/1/Risk_Factors_of_Dental_Implant_Survival_0630.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.