Explaining contemporary anti -immigration attitudes in Germany and the Netherlands.
Akiyama, Mark Kensey
2003
Abstract
Using multistage national probability samples from Germany and the Netherlands, this study investigated three approaches used to explain prejudice and racism in the United States as predictors of immigration policy preferences: (a) biological distance (that emphasized biological inferiority of non-whites); (b) covert prejudice (that emphasized the denial that immigrants face discrimination or that immigrants need government assistance) and (c) intergroup threat (that emphasized the perception of threat and insecurity over competition for resources with immigrants). The study had three aims: (1) test whether prejudice/racism factors (i.e., perceived biological distance, covert prejudice, and intergroup threat) independently and additively predicted immigration policy preferences; (2) test whether biological forms of racism (i.e. perceived biological distance) had waned in the European context or if they were useful predictors of immigration policy preferences; (3) test if the direct relationship between biological distance and immigration policy preferences was fully mediated by covert prejudice and intergroup threat. Contrary to the predictions, in Germany, biological distance independently explained a considerable proportion of variance of immigration policy preferences when controlling for the effects of covert prejudice and intergroup threat. In addition, covert prejudice and intergroup threat did not mediate the relationship between biological distance and immigration policy preferences. By contrast, in support of the hypotheses the results for the Netherlands found that the effect of biological distance on immigration policy preferences was suppressed when controlling for the effects of covert prejudice and intergroup threat. In addition, the direct relationship found between biological distance and immigration policy preferences was fully mediated by intergroup threat. Finally, post-hoc analyses found that intergroup threat fully mediated the direct relationship between covert prejudice and anti-immigration policy preferences. From the results, it was argued that strong kinship-ethnic ties, dominant-minority group position and exclusionary immigration policies are all factors that might contribute to weak social norms against the overt expression of prejudice towards immigrants in Germany. On the other hand, the Netherlands emphasis on immigration policies of inclusion and multiculturalism seem to contribute to norms of tolerance towards immigrants. The findings highlight the importance of how history and macro-social factors influence immigration attitudes in specific societies. Implications for future research on immigrant psychology are discussed.Subjects
Anti-immigration Attitudes Contemporary Explaining Germany Netherlands Prejudice
Types
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.