Show simple item record

Formulation and evaluation of emulsifier systems for petroleum- and bio-based semi-synthetic metalworking fluids.

dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Julie Beth
dc.contributor.advisorBulkley, Johnathan W.
dc.contributor.advisorHayes, Kim Ford
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:24:17Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3096254
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/123762
dc.description.abstractMetalworking fluids (MWFs) are essential to manufacturing for cooling and lubrication. Most MWFs are oil-in-water emulsions that pose human and environmental hazards throughout their life cycle. One strategy to reduce these hazards is to optimize MWF formulations for long-term emulsion stability under typical field conditions including hardwater. Fundamental research to quantify relationships between the physiochemical properties of MWF emulsifier systems, emulsion stability in hardwater, and MWF performance has been limited. This research evaluates the effectiveness of common commercial emulsifier systems to maintain emulsion stability under hardwater conditions. The results indicate that increasing cation concentration and charge results in increasing emulsion sizes and decreasing zeta potential where monovalent cations have little impact on emulsion destabilization while higher charge cations have a significant impact. Given the ineffectiveness of these emulsifier systems to maintain emulsion stability in hardwater, an investigation into the design of emulsifier systems for improved hardwater stability was conducted. This investigation quantifies the impact of emulsifier system properties on hardwater stability. Results from 2500 formulations indicate that the use of a twin-headed anionic surfactant can provide improved hardwater stability for both petroleum- and bio-based formulations. The machining performance of MWF formulations based on the new emulsifier systems was compared to commercial MWFs. Machining performance was evaluated by a new method designed to minimize sources of variability and to correlate with expected field performance. Results from machining performance tests indicate that the MWFs designed for hardwater stability are competitive with current MWF products. Since both petroleum- and bio-based MWFs were successfully formulated for hardwater stability, an analysis of the life cycle energy and emissions was conducted for three end of life handling strategies (disposal, oil recycling, oil incineration) to support feedstock selection decisions. The results suggest that there is a trade-off between emissions categories and energy consumption depending on MWF feedstock. This analysis also demonstrates the oil reclamation for reconstitution as MWF most favorably reduces MWF life cycle emissions and energy consumption. These results can be used to minimize MWF life cycle emissions and energy consumption through informed feedstock selection and the design of emulsifier systems for long-term stability in hardwater.
dc.format.extent216 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectBased
dc.subjectBio
dc.subjectEmulsifier
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectFormulation
dc.subjectGreen Engineering
dc.subjectMetalworking Fluids
dc.subjectPetroleum
dc.subjectSemi
dc.subjectSynthetic
dc.subjectSystems
dc.titleFormulation and evaluation of emulsifier systems for petroleum- and bio-based semi-synthetic metalworking fluids.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineApplied Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnvironmental engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/123762/2/3096254.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.