Show simple item record

Faculty member perspectives and practices regarding undergraduate research.

dc.contributor.authorCoad, David R.
dc.contributor.advisorLawrence, Janet H.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:25:11Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3106035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/123810
dc.description.abstractOne recent response to persistent concerns about the quality of undergraduate education at research universities has been to emphasize the importance of undergraduate research. Although literature addresses the impact of participation on undergraduates, little is known about faculty involvement. Unexplored questions include: Why do faculty members choose to collaborate with undergraduate students in doing research? How do they structure these experiences, and view their meaning or importance? How do faculty views and practices vary by selected faculty attributes? These questions were addressed through an exploratory qualitative study with a sample of thirty faculty members at one Midwestern research university, who were interviewed using a semi-structured protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory and phenomenological techniques. Grounded theory analysis yielded a model of undergraduate research collaboration comprised of three stages and four phases. Stages represented structural conditions within collaboration (considering collaboration, collaborating, and culminating collaboration), and phases illustrated progression among the stages, based on faculty members' goal orientations, perceptions, decision-making, and actions (e.g., assessing student and project fit leading to collaboration commitment, and characterizing previous collaborations leading to faculty outcomes). Phenomenological analysis revealed four common components of undergraduate research collaborations---research, faculty, students, research others, and developed six typologies from recurrent patterns of variation among these components: science apprenticeship, intellectual ownership, life mentorship, community stewardship, academic sponsorship, and research assistantship. By extracting essential elements from these descriptions and categorizations, a definition of undergraduate research collaboration was developed. Specifically, from faculty perspectives, it is a functional partnership between an undergraduate student and a faculty member in which both are directly and actively involved in planning and/or executing a project of inquiry drawn from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary focus. Integration of these findings showed how phenomenological elements operate similarly and uniquely within the grounded theory stage/phase model. Further research questions posed by the study addressed ways to refine the preliminary model of undergraduate research collaboration. Practice implications outlined how faculty perspectives might be used to enhance individual research collaborations and improve research program effectiveness.
dc.format.extent610 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectFaculty
dc.subjectMember
dc.subjectPerspectives
dc.subjectPractices
dc.subjectRegarding
dc.subjectResearch Universities
dc.subjectUndergraduate Research
dc.titleFaculty member perspectives and practices regarding undergraduate research.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/123810/2/3106035.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.