Institutional contexts and faculty traits that predict use of the Web by college faculty teaching in traditional classrooms.
dc.contributor.author | Grunwald, Heidi E. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dey, Eric L. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Raudenbush, Steve | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T15:37:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T15:37:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3138163 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/124417 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines institutional and disciplinary contexts that predict use of the Web by college faculty teaching in traditional classroom settings, after controlling for demographics, job traits and faculty beliefs and behaviors. A cross-classified, hierarchical linear model is fit to data from the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, 1999. The results suggest that there is an institutional-level digital divide whereby faculty at two-year colleges and teaching institutions use the Web for instruction significantly less than faculty at research institutions, suggesting implications for the types of students these institutions serve. The findings also show that institutional contexts are more telling than disciplinary contexts in predicting overall faculty use of the Web for instruction. At the faculty level, high teaching loads coupled with part-time job status are the primary barriers to faculty use of the Web for instruction. On average, full-time faculty use the Web more than part-time faculty, but the gap between the two groups is smallest for faculty with high teaching loads. The findings also suggest that, controlling for job traits, female faculty use the Web significantly less for instruction than do male faculty. This study also finds that faculty at four-year teaching institutions, those who teach distance education classes are more likely to bring their techno-savvy skills into traditional classroom settings than faculty at two-year and research institutions. Suggestions are offered to institutional leaders seeking to entice faculty toward adopting instructional technology. | |
dc.format.extent | 135 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | College | |
dc.subject | Faculty | |
dc.subject | Innovation Adoption | |
dc.subject | Institutional Contexts | |
dc.subject | Predict | |
dc.subject | Teaching | |
dc.subject | Traditional Classrooms | |
dc.subject | Traits | |
dc.subject | Use | |
dc.subject | World Wide Web | |
dc.title | Institutional contexts and faculty traits that predict use of the Web by college faculty teaching in traditional classrooms. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Education | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Educational technology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Higher education | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/124417/2/3138163.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.