Show simple item record

Estimating risk factors for delays in childhood immunization using the National Health Interview Survey.

dc.contributor.authorDombkowski, Kevin John
dc.contributor.advisorLantz, Paula M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:38:21Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3010441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/124479
dc.description.abstractThis study demonstrates the importance of the distinction between up-to-date and age-appropriate vaccination status in risk factor analysis and performance measurement. A retrospective cohort analysis using a sample of 9,223 children 25--72 months of age from the 1992--1996 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was conducted to determine if the DTP4, third polio, and MMR1 vaccine doses were received age-appropriately and if not, length of delay was calculated. Risk factors were estimated using logistic regression models, and policy simulations were conducted to assess the potential benefits of removing existing barriers to age-appropriate vaccination. Only 46% of children received the DTP4 dose age-appropriately, while 64% received the third polio dose, and 57% the MMR1 dose age-appropriately. Black race, urban residence, absence of a two-parent household, large family size, high school education level or less, no insurance coverage, and no household telephone were significantly related to an increased likelihood of delay for each the DTP4, polio3, and MMR1 doses (p ≤ .05). Male gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, suburban residence, poverty level, Medicaid enrollment, and absence of a usual provider were also significantly related to increased likelihood of vaccination delay for one or more of these vaccine doses (p ≤ .05). Of these risk factors, suburban residence, two-parent household, poverty status, education level, insurance coverage, Medicaid eligibility, and no household telephone were found to be statistically significant only in risk models of vaccination delay and not in risk models of up-to-date vaccination status. The results of this study illustrate that removal of key access barriers, such as not having health insurance or a usual source of medical care, can substantially reduce vaccination delay. Despite the removal of these barriers, some children still have exceedingly high likelihood of vaccination delay, suggesting that interventions that focus on these high-risk populations may be necessary to minimize vaccination delay. While surveillance of vaccination coverage rates remains an important public health function, the results of this study suggest that age-appropriate vaccination status should also be monitored.
dc.format.extent151 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAge-appropriate
dc.subjectChildhood Immunization
dc.subjectDelays
dc.subjectEstimating
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectInterview
dc.subjectNational
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectUsing
dc.subjectVaccination
dc.subjectVaccinations
dc.titleEstimating risk factors for delays in childhood immunization using the National Health Interview Survey.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenameD.P.H.
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth care management
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePublic health
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, School of Public Health
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/124479/2/3010441.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.