Show simple item record

Emotional dialecticism versus optimism: Cultural styles of emotion regulation among Chinese, Japanese, and *Americans.

dc.contributor.authorLeu, Janxin
dc.contributor.advisorEllsworth, Phoebe C.
dc.contributor.advisorNisbett, Richard E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:38:24Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3150018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/124481
dc.description.abstractThe present study provides evidence of both cultural similarities and differences in the representation of positive and negative emotions, and in how good positive emotions feel. Judgments of emotions made by American, Chinese, and Japanese college students were elicited using standardized events in a repeated-measures design. The relationship between positive and negative emotions was examined in positive, negative, and ambiguous (or mixed) events selected from a longer diary about a college student. We also studied participants' association of positive emotions with pleasantness (e.g., feeling good) independent from their association of negative emotions and unpleasantness (e.g., feeling bad). Results of the study challenged two assumptions: (1) positive emotions are the opposite of negative emotions; and (2) positive emotions feel just as good (or negative emotions feel just as bad) to someone in a Western context, as they do to someone in an Asian context. Across events, all three sampled cultural groups represented positive and negative emotions as opposites of each other, although this association was stronger among Americans. However in response to positive events, only Americans demonstrated an oppositional representation of positive and negative emotions; Japanese and Chinese reports of positive emotions were not related to their reports of negative emotions. Additionally, while all three sampled cultural groups associated positive emotions with feeling good, and negative emotions with feeling bad, positive emotions felt better for Americans than for Chinese. There were no cultural differences in how bad negative emotions felt. We discuss the roles of representing positive and negative emotions as opposites, and of maximizing the pleasantness of positive emotions among Americans in producing an emotional style of <italic>optimism</italic> or <italic>positivity </italic>. In contrast, we frame feeling positive and negative emotions simultaneously, and an emphasis on emotion moderation away from both positive and negative extremes, as a <italic>dialectical</italic> emotional style among Japanese and Chinese. Both styles of emotion regulation are informed by cultural models of self, emotion, and subjective well-being. <italic>Emotional optimism</italic> among Americans reflects the cultural values of independence from others, agency, and self-esteem; <italic>emotional dialecticism</italic> among Chinese and Japanese reflects the cultural values of social roles, interdependency, and social harmony.
dc.format.extent116 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAmericans
dc.subjectChinese
dc.subjectCultural Styles
dc.subjectDialecticism
dc.subjectEmotion Regulation
dc.subjectEmotional
dc.subjectJapanese
dc.subjectOptimism
dc.subjectVersus
dc.titleEmotional dialecticism versus optimism: Cultural styles of emotion regulation among Chinese, Japanese, and *Americans.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCultural anthropology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/124481/2/3150018.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.