Commercialization of biodiversity: Processes, actors, and contestation in Ecuador, 1536--2001.
dc.contributor.author | Dorsey, Michael K. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bryant, Bunyan I. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T15:54:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T15:54:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3192623 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/125346 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation details how particular sets of socio-cultural and political-economic practices to control biodiversity, or bioprospecting, and forms of engagement with it, emerge in Ecuador. The dissertation uses historically based and theoretically driven approaches of political ecology and political economy to examine Ecuadorian bioprospecting. The dissertation expands political ecology theory by seeking to understand and describe the manner in which particular forms of biodiversity management---bioprospecting and concomitant biocommerce---are the result of political processes influenced and shaped by particular economic outlooks, primarily economic neoliberalism. The primary vehicle to accomplish the above is via a set of case studies of bioprospecting in Ecuador. This dissertation uses a <italic>multi-method research strategy </italic> bound together by one central approach: ethnographic case study. The dissertation brings together archival research, competitive intelligence research, discourse analysis of pharmaceutical actors, multi-site ethnography, semi-structured interviews, and sustained participant observation to yield comparative multidimensional and multi-actor analysis of bioprospecting in Ecuador. Accordingly, the dissertation elaborates how social relations enable and condition certain dogmas about what biodiversity is and what is being done to control it. The methods help reveal trends and findings common across the cases and further situate the necessary particularities of Ecuadorian bioprospecting. The dissertation demonstrates that it is possible and fruitful to conduct comparative case study research of bioprospecting. At the same time the dissertation reveals that such an activity is fundamentally subjective, given what is required to accomplish it. The dissertation further reveals that, while the bioprospecting projects subject to inquiry have yet to yield hits, they are generate market value in other ways, primarily through the creation of biological based databases that are commodified, sold and leveraged in the future. This last finding highlights that new science and capital partnerships are being forged and are unfolding. Collectively, the findings point the way for subsequent research on bioprospecting at near, medium and long-term horizons; as well as along research and policy lines of inquiry. | |
dc.format.extent | 286 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | Actors | |
dc.subject | Biodiversity | |
dc.subject | Commercialization | |
dc.subject | Contestation | |
dc.subject | Ecuador | |
dc.subject | Ethnography | |
dc.subject | Processes | |
dc.title | Commercialization of biodiversity: Processes, actors, and contestation in Ecuador, 1536--2001. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Cultural anthropology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Environmental science | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Health and Environmental Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Latin American history | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/125346/2/3192623.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.