Show simple item record

Factors influencing diet and prey selection of the sculpin <italic>Cottus cognatus</italic> and <italic>Myoxocephalus thompsonii</italic>.

dc.contributor.authorHondorp, Darryl W.
dc.contributor.advisorBrandt, Stephen B.
dc.contributor.advisorRutherford, Edward S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:07:13Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3224904
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/126052
dc.description.abstractSelective feeding by fish can have profound impacts on prey community structure and food web dynamics in aquatic ecosystems, but few studies have examined prey selection in benthic fishes. In this study, diet and prey selection dynamics were analyzed for two benthic fish from Lake Michigan, slimy sculpin <italic> Cottus cognatus</italic> and deepwater sculpin <italic>Myoxocephalus thompsonii </italic> (Family Cottidae). The benthic amphipod <italic>Diporeia</italic> was an important prey for both sculpin, but relative frequencies of other prey in sculpin diets differed between species. For example, <italic>Mysis relicta</italic> was significantly more common in the diet of deepwater sculpin, whereas chironomids (Order: Diptera; Family: Chironomidae) were more important prey for slimy sculpin. These patterns suggested differences in prey selection between the two sculpin species. This was confirmed by a field-based study of sculpin prey selection, which showed that chironomids and <italic>Diporeia </italic> were preferentially consumed by slimy sculpin, whereas <italic> Mysis</italic> was preferentially consumed only by deepwater sculpin. Variation in prey-species selection within and between sculpin species was associated with differential prey capture and encounter rates. For example, due to differences in prey evasiveness, prey capture success by sculpin in laboratory feeding trials was greatest for chironomids, lowest for <italic>Mysis,</italic> and intermediate for <italic>Diporeia.</italic> This pattern was consistent with trends in slimy sculpin prey-species selection observed in the field. Similarly, greater occurrence of <italic>Mysis</italic> in deepwater sculpin diets was partly attributable to higher capture success with mysid prey. Encounter rates with <italic>Mysis</italic> also may be higher for deepwater sculpin than for slimy sculpin due to the former's larger reactive volume. The larger reactive volume of deepwater sculpin may give it a competitive advantage over slimy sculpin in areas of sympatry, a hypothesis supported by the relative scarcity of slimy sculpin at depths where deepwater sculpin are abundant. This study also showed that sculpin are size-selective predators. Results suggested that partitioning of prey size may be one way to alleviate interspecific competition for prey such as <italic>Diporeia</italic> that were common in the diets of both sculpin.
dc.format.extent162 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectBenthic Fish
dc.subjectCottus Cognatus
dc.subjectDiet
dc.subjectDiporeia
dc.subjectFactors
dc.subjectForaging
dc.subjectInfluencing
dc.subjectMyoxocephalus Thompsonii
dc.subjectMysis
dc.subjectPrey
dc.subjectSculpin
dc.subjectSelection
dc.titleFactors influencing diet and prey selection of the sculpin <italic>Cottus cognatus</italic> and <italic>Myoxocephalus thompsonii</italic>.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAquatic sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiological Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEcology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/126052/2/3224904.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.