Computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety in a hospital social work and nursing case management department.
dc.contributor.author | Barcy, William Russell | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Gutierrez, Lorraine M. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Tropman, John E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T16:07:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T16:07:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3237903 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/126093 | |
dc.description.abstract | The current health care delivery system increasingly relies upon information technology (IT) to more effectively and efficiently meet patient needs. The present study examined the relationship of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived computer usefulness to performance utilizing IT programs by clinical staff in a hospital-based social work and nursing case management department. Use of IT programs within the hospital setting was assessed by self-reported frequency of use of the shared drive system of electronic resources and by observed behavioral proficiency in completing a computerized search task of resources on the shared drive. Computer self-efficacy was assessed by a self-report survey adapted from the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale developed by Murphy, Coover, and Owen (1989). Computer anxiety was assessed by Johnson's (2005) self-report survey version of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale adapted to reflect the specific IT programs utilized in the hospital setting. Computer usefulness was assessed by a modified version of the self-report Usefulness survey developed by Franz and Robey (1986). All of the 45 participants completed the self-report survey measures, with 27 also completing the computerized search task. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. The results indicated significant relationships between observed behavioral proficiency on the computerized search task and self-reported ratings of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety. Higher task proficiency was associated with higher computer self-efficacy ratings. Lower task proficiency was associated with higher computer anxiety. More frequent self-reported use of the shared drive system was significantly associated with higher ratings of computer usefulness. | |
dc.format.extent | 106 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | Anxiety | |
dc.subject | Computer Self-efficacy | |
dc.subject | Hospital | |
dc.subject | Information Technology | |
dc.subject | Social Work And Nursing Case Management Department | |
dc.title | Computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety in a hospital social work and nursing case management department. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Behavioral psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Communication and the Arts | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Health and Environmental Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Information science | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Nursing | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Occupational psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social work | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/126093/2/3237903.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.