Owning empire: The matter of India in the English -speaking world, 1730--1830.
dc.contributor.author | Eacott, Jonathan Phillips | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hancock, David J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T16:24:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T16:24:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3328812 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127052 | |
dc.description.abstract | Goods and artifacts manufactured in and inspired by India mattered a great deal to consumers, merchants, industrialists, and governments in the long-eighteenth-century English-speaking world. Through a selective process of re-invention and assimilation of India goods, English-speaking people defined and redefined their economies, social structures, and identities, as well as their perceptions of India. This dissertation explains the far-reaching importance of decisions made by Britons, colonists, and Americans to assimilate the production and consumption of such India goods as cotton cloth and umbrellas into their local economies and societies, while they associated such other India goods as hookah pipes and palanquins with the East. It argues that by flexibly balancing economic, cultural, political and moral interests in place and across space, Britons made their empire powerful and enduring. Recovering the importance of India in the everyday lives of English-speakers in three distant cities, Calcutta, London, and Philadelphia, brings the complex process of cultural appropriation that led to a level of shared experience throughout the empire into focus. Britain's presence in India helped maintain this shared experience for decades after the formal independence of the Thirteen Colonies. Philadelphia merchants depended on the resources of the British empire in Calcutta, to bring to America, goods made popular in London. Yet men and women in each city did not always make the same decisions about which goods from India they would own and what that ownership would mean. Consumer preferences played out differently depending on systems of trade, geographies and methods of production, material advantages, marks of status, and political and moral meanings. Historians tend to see the British empire in the long eighteenth century as politically and legally fractured, yet dominated by an essentially British culture. Looking at the circulation and consumption of India goods in India, Britain, and America, reveals instead how the interactive, composite, and flexible nature of imperial trade and culture supported British strength. Beyond the eighteenth century, this work offers a new understanding of the multiple ways through which people in consumer societies use goods to connect the events of their daily lives with macro trends in economics, politics, and social construction. | |
dc.format.extent | 474 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | British Empire | |
dc.subject | East India Company | |
dc.subject | English | |
dc.subject | Fashion | |
dc.subject | India Trade | |
dc.subject | Industrial Revolution | |
dc.subject | Material Culture | |
dc.subject | Matter | |
dc.subject | Owning | |
dc.subject | Speaking | |
dc.subject | World | |
dc.title | Owning empire: The matter of India in the English -speaking world, 1730--1830. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | American history | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | European history | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127052/2/3328812.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.