Show simple item record

Comparison and predictors of student satisfaction with their performance in university courses delivered by point -to -point and multipoint interactive television.

dc.contributor.authorGrove, Sheryl Jean
dc.contributor.advisorBerger, Carl
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:32:46Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:32:46Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3000911
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/127511
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the difference in student satisfaction with their performance in the course and its predictors in two settings of interactive televised (ITV) settings---point-to-point and multipoint. Data were collected, in 1995, at a state university. Satisfaction was measured by student report. Published and researcher designed surveys were used to explore characteristics of students, teachers, technology and context of learning. Participants included 237 students from twelve point-to-point courses in eight disciplines and 120 students from four multipoint courses in four disciplines. Point-to-point courses had students and a teacher from an on-campus site connected to students at an off-campus site. Multipoint courses had students and a teacher from an on-campus site connected to students at three to five off-campus sites. Differences were not found in student satisfaction with their performance in the course. Grade expected by students was a positive significant predictor in both settings. The interpersonal characteristics---feeling part of the class, friendly feelings toward students at other sites, and nonverbal communication of teachers---were significant point-to-point predictors. The intrapersonal characteristics---self-efficacy and college requirement of the class---were significant multipoint predictors. ITV instructors should be cognizant of their nonverbal behavior and should work to provide a positive socio-emotional environment in point-to-point settings. Instructors and students should develop plans for enhancing student self-efficacy in multipoint settings. Such plans should include increasing student focus and monitoring comprehension of material taught. University administrators should deliver point-to-point courses to and from off-campus sites only. This would provide a common baseline of situation for students, which could enhance interpersonal relationships among them. University administrators should also deliver multipoint classes from empty classrooms or studios. This would eliminate the need for an on-campus site, the site where students do not directly benefit from this delivery mode and are most likely to be dissatisfied, especially, when taking the course as a college requirement.
dc.format.extent214 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAcademic Performance
dc.subjectComparison
dc.subjectDelivered
dc.subjectInteractive Television
dc.subjectMultipoint
dc.subjectPoint
dc.subjectPredictors
dc.subjectStudent Satisfaction
dc.subjectUniversity Courses
dc.titleComparison and predictors of student satisfaction with their performance in university courses delivered by point -to -point and multipoint interactive television.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenameDoctor of Education (EdD)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAdult education
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducational technology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHigher education
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/127511/2/3000911.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.